Teacher effects show up more dramatically on teacher made tests than
on standardized achievement tests because the former are based on the enacted curriculum, while the latter are based on the desired curriculum.
CASEL reports: «A landmark review found that students who receive SEL instruction had more positive attitudes about school and improved an average of 11 percentile
points on standardized achievement tests compared to students who did not receive such instruction.»
In a quasi-experimental study in nine Title I schools, principals and teacher leaders used explicit protocols for leading grade - level learning teams, resulting in students outperforming their peers in six matched
schools on standardized achievement tests (Gallimore, Ermeling, Saunders, and Goldenberg, 2009).
A landmark review found that students who receive SEL instruction had more positive attitudes about school and improved an average of 11 percentile points
on standardized achievement tests compared to students who did not receive such instruction.
Research by Sean Corcoran, William Evans, and Robert Schwab indicates that the likelihood of a female teacher having been among the highest - scoring 10 percent of high school students
on standardized achievement tests fell sharply between 1971 and 2000, from 24 to 11 percent.
In The Four - Day School Week, another School Administrator report, Jack McCoy, deputy director of learning services at the New Mexico Department of Education, said in his district's case attendance for teachers and students improved while scores
on standardized achievement tests remained stable.
The results are consistent with other studies that show a substantial return (up to 50 percent of a standard
deviation on standardized achievement tests) to achievement from observed classroom quality, with greater effects often accruing to children with higher levels of risk and disadvantage.
«One of the chief reasons that children's socioeconomic status is so highly correlated with standardized test scores is that many
items on standardized achievement tests really focus on assessing knowledge and / or skills learned outside of schoolâknowledge and / or skills more likely to be learned in some socioeconomic settings than in others.»
Educators often write their CFA questions to reflect the formats of state, provincial, and national assessments so students have ongoing opportunities to demonstrate what they are learning in the ways they will be expected to
respond on standardized achievement tests.
According to a study by the Council of Great City Schools, students that attend school in deteriorating buildings score between 5 to 11 percentile points
lower on standardized achievement tests than students in modern, maintained buildings.
A landmark review found that students who receive SEL instruction had more positive attitudes about school and improved an average of 11 percentile points
on standardized achievement tests compared to students who did not receive such instruction.
Minority students from Black, Hispanic, and American Indian backgrounds are less likely to have been selected for gifted education programs and less likely to perform
well on standardized achievement tests than their nonminority peers.
When children have the skills to listen, calm down, empathize with others, and solve problems, they can focus more on their studies — in fact, a recent CASEL study showed that students who receive SEL instruction improved an average of 11 percentile
points on standardized achievement tests.
According to the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL), a group that advocates the widespread adoption of SEL instruction, students exposed to SEL see their
scores on standardized achievement test scores rise by an average of 11 percentile points, compared to students who are not exposed.
Although students» scores on standardized aptitude tests are sometimes unwisely stirred into the school - evaluation stew, scores
on standardized achievement tests are typically the ones used to judge a school's success.
Of these nine options, «improving students» scores
on standardized achievement tests» came in last place with 69 percent support (36 percent strongly).
Provide parents with an annual written explanation of the student's progress, including scores on standardized achievement tests
The Small Schools Coalition catalogs research from scholars worldwide documenting how students in small schools outperform students in large schools
on standardized achievement tests, significantly.
States may reasonably differ in how they define and measure teaching effectiveness; in particular, they may place different emphasis on the importance of student scores
on standardized achievement tests — but states must act to improve their teacher evaluation and tenure processes as part of a broader push to improve teacher quality and classroom instruction.
Provide to the parent or guardian an annual written explanation of a student's progress, including the student's scores
on standardized achievement tests;
Studies so far tell us that we can expect the «better» teacher's students to score about 6 percentile points higher, on average,
on a standardized achievement test than the students of the «worse» teacher.
«Scores
on standardized achievement tests» was the least selected approach among all demographics.
The gift responds to CASEL's recent summary of the research, which finds that social and emotional learning can significantly raise students» scores
on standardized achievement tests, build attachment to school, improve interpersonal attitudes and behaviors, and decrease negative behaviors, such as violence and substance abuse.