Sentences with phrase «on state interference»
I have just completed a taught Masters with KCL on state interference with private competition, i.e. Art. 106 in conjunction with Art. 102 and Inno v. ATAB in conjunction with Art. 101.
https://www.lawyer-monthly.com/ Not exact matches
«Let me state this clearly: I have never met with or had any conversations with any Russians or any foreign officials concerning any type of interference with any campaign or election,» Sessions said on Tuesday.
Central bank independence, or monetary policy autonomy refers to a central bank's ability to conduct monetary policy without political interference, that monetary policy decisions are made purely based on economic and financial conditions to achieve publicly - stated objective (s) of a central bank.
The rigging of gold persists without regulatory or legal interference because it is based on a straightforward deal between the profiteering Deep State financial elite, and the western governments they control: the criminals are allowed to manipulate the gold market however brazenly they wish and keep whatever sums they steal, as long as they keep the gold price under control.
He campaigned on the principle of no immediate interference with slavery in the states where it already existed and absolutely no extension of slavery into any territories.
O'Connor emphasizes that earlier Court rulings forbidding state licensing and taxing of religious activity were based on the fact that state interference was a «prior restraint» on a constitutionally protected freedom.
This obligation is qualified only by the principle that parents may not make grossly unjust demands upon the child, on pain of interference by the state as guardian of basic human rights.
I am an atheist... If this is the worst, I'll take it... What I will not take is the rest, the constant interference of religion in everyday lives, the less and less clear separation between Church and State, the bigoted right - wingers who look down on us (us who think that we have escaped the greatest delusion of all, us who believe that religion is a way to escape individual neurosis by adhering to a social neurosis...), the attempts at proselytism, the anti-Darwinian «oh - so - lame» criticism..
There had been a federal hiatus on interference in state cannabis markets due to something called «the Cole memo».
«In the light of the foregoing, our client has instructed us to serve you notice of its intention to institute legal proceeding against the State as a result of the wrongful interference by State officials with our client's right to» prospect on its concession and also a breach of its right to administrative justice, the latter cause of action resulting from the seizure and - detention of trucks without, due process as well as recover all sums of money our client must pay to Engineers an Planners by reason of the actions of die State officials responsible for the seizure and detention of the trucks.»
However, it tends to blur the relationship between property and republican freedom, and between property and democracy, focusing instead on absence of domination and arbitrary interference by other individuals and groups, including the State.
However, the Coalition government elected in May 2010 accused Labour of having presided over «the most aggressive period of state interference in this country in a generation», typified by such things as ID Cards, the creation of a huge DNA database, and the amassing of thousands of new criminal offences on to the statute book.
Similarly, article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to which Nigeria is a state party protects Nigerians» right to maintain an opinion without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers.
Four commissioners on the state Joint Commission on Public Ethics say the recent hiring of State Police First Deputy Superintendent Kevin Gagan as the watchdog panel's chief of staff and special counsel is «plainly invalid,» and another example of «incessant interference» in its operatstate Joint Commission on Public Ethics say the recent hiring of State Police First Deputy Superintendent Kevin Gagan as the watchdog panel's chief of staff and special counsel is «plainly invalid,» and another example of «incessant interference» in its operatState Police First Deputy Superintendent Kevin Gagan as the watchdog panel's chief of staff and special counsel is «plainly invalid,» and another example of «incessant interference» in its operations.
According to the organization, «The orders sought are necessary to know exactly what happened to the Paris Club refunds, and the release of the information including on a dedicated website would be deemed incidental to the power of the federal government to achieve effective implementation of anticorruption legislation such as the Corrupt Practices and other Related Offences Act, which is applicable in all states of the federation, and will not amount to interference with activities within the states involved.»
In effect, it might be reasonable to state that such roles and responsibilities to protect can not be blocked by the invocation of sovereignty — as claimed by Jammeh and many other dictators in the not - so - distant past — therefore, «sovereignty no longer exclusively protects States [individuals] from foreign interference; it is a charge of implicit responsibility for the States to be accountable on behalf of the welfare of their people».
Lets see: nominating a Superintendent that is beholden to him after his 2007 report on interference in the State Police called for an independent Super; elevating his person to Chair the commission on public integrity, and now another confidant as IG.
Jordi Mestres, coordinator of the IMIM and UPF research group on Systems Pharmacology at the Biomedical Informatics Program (GRIB) states «With this study we have contributed to complementing the detection of these quite unstable fragments, with information on the mechanism of action of the drug, based on three aspects: similarity to other medicines, prediction of their pharmacological profile, and interference with specific biological pathways.
... The discussion meanders along the surface, touching on Russian interference in U.S. elections and the state of discourse in American society — though never deeply.
For example, contrary to expectations that Louisiana would use the definitive data it has been collecting from its value - added examination of teacher - preparation programs for over a decade, it has yet to withhold approval from any program, believing instead that programs will choose to improve on their own without the state's interference.
On their side is their union, whose governing documents clearly state: «NEA deplores prepublishing censorship, book - burning crusades, and attempts to ban books from school library media centers and school curricula,» and resolves that «Teachers and school library media specialists must have the right to select and use materials and techniques without censorship or legislative interference.»
The Student Success Act's most dramatic components center on the bill's accountability provisions, which allow states to determine how they will judge and improve school performance with minimal interference or direction from the federal government.
State leaders dispute her assessment, but the argument hints at a larger issue: with a leader who is wired to think that less government is always better in charge of a department that has to implement federal policy, it makes little sense to complain when states take you up on your offer of less interference.
You will not, and will not allow or authorize others to, use the Services, the Sites or any Materials therein to take any actions that: (i) infringe on PetSmart Charities» or any third party's copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret or other intellectual or proprietary rights, or rights of publicity or privacy; (ii) violate any applicable law, statute, ordinance or regulation (including those regarding export control); (iii) are defamatory, trade libelous, threatening, harassing, invasive of privacy, stalking, harassment, abusive, tortuous, hateful, constitute discrimination based on race, religion, ethnicity, gender, sex, disability or other protected grounds, or are pornographic or obscene; (iv) interfere with or disrupt any services or equipment with the intent of causing an excessive or disproportionate load on PetSmart Charities or its licensors or suppliers» infrastructure; (v) involve knowingly distributing viruses, Trojan horses, worms, or other similar harmful or deleterious programming routines; (vi) involve the preparation and / or distribution of «junk mail», «spam», «chain letters», «pyramid schemes» or other deceptive online marketing practices, or any unsolicited bulk email or unsolicited commercial email or otherwise in a manner that violate any applicable «anti-spam» legislation, including that commonly referred to as «CASL»; (vii) would be or encourage conduct that could constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate any applicable local, state, national or international laws or regulations; (viii) involve the unauthorized entry to any machine accessible via the Services or interference with the Sites or any servers or networks connected to the Sites or disobey any requirements, procedures, policies or regulations of networks connected to the Sites, or attempt to breach the security of or disrupt Internet communications on the Sites (including without limitation accessing data to which you are not the intended recipient or logging into a server or account for which you are not expressly authorized); (ix) impersonate any person or entity, including, without limitation, one of PetSmart Charities» or another party's officers or employees, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity; (x) forge headers or otherwise manipulate identifiers in order to disguise the origin of any information transmitted through the Sites; (xi) collect or store personal data about other account users or attempt to gain access to other account users» accounts or otherwise mine information about other account users or the Sites, or interfere with any other user's ability to access or use the Sites; (xii) execute any form of network monitoring or run a network analyzer or packet sniffer or other technology to intercept, decode, mine or display any packets used to communicate between the Sites» servers or any data not intended for you; (xiii) attempt to circumvent authentication or security of any content, host, network or account («cracking») on or from the Sites; or (xiv) in PetSmart Charities» sole discretion, are contrary to PetSmart Charities» public image, goodwill, reputation or mission, or otherwise not in furtherance of our Vision of a lifelong, loving home for every pet.
Langevin has spent the last six months in hardware development at Xbox, where he states he has worked on «high speed data buses to prevent electromagnetic interference in next - gen devices».
On the whole, the good works outnumber the mediocre ones, and that is quite a coup for an exhibition of this size, especially one at a state - run museum that must, all times, struggle with government interference.
2002 CAB Gallery Retrospective 1999 - 2001, Essor Gallery Project Space, London, UK Between Language and Form, Yale University Art Gallery, New Haven, Connecticut, US Amsterdam Revisited: Adam & Eve On Sex, Tolerance and other Dependencies, De Appel, Amsterdam, NL Reaction - A Global Response to 9/11, Exit Art, New York, US Art Aficionado Auction of Cigar Box Art, Birmingham Museum of Art, Birmingham, Alabama, US Just Remember: It's Vienna, Galerie Hubert Winter, Vienna, AT Welfare State International, London, UK Light & Shadows..., Galerie Anselm Dreher, Berlin, DE From the Observatory, Paula Cooper Gallery, New York, US Galerie Pietro Spartà, Chagny, FR Coolecção Onnasch: Aspectos da Arte Contemporânea, Museu Serralves / Museu Arte Contemporânea, Porto, PT Conceptual Art 1965 - 1975 from Dutch and Belgian Collections, Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam, NE DIN Art 4 - 560 Künstler und 1 Formular, Museum für Kommunikation, Hamburg, DE 2002 Benefit Silent Auction and Gala, White Columns, New York, US Parole, Parole, Parole, Galleria Civica di Arte Contemporanea, Trento, IT Water - Sand — Space, The International Art Exhibition: Sharjah Art Museum, UAE; Städtischen Galerie Wolfsburg, DE Private Views, London Print Studio Gallery, London, UK Collections, Stedelijk Museum, Amsterdam, NL Startkapital, K21 Kunstsmamlung Nordhein - Westfalen, DE 20 Years in Danish Art, Stalke Galleri & Galleri Kirke Sonnerup, DK The Artists» Memory, Stadtische Museen Jena, Kabinett im Stadtmuseen, DE Ideal Avalanche, The Pond, Chicago, Illinois, UK Pièes de Collection / Oeuvres Contemporaines, Une Proposition de Françoise et Jean - Philippe Billarant, Ecole Supérieure des Beaux - Arts de Nîmes, ESBAN @ Hôtel Rivet, FR Hors d'Oeuvre, Artist's Pages, Le Journal de l'art Contemporain en Bourgogne, No. 10, FR Frenetic Interferences a presentation of MEMORY / CAGE EDITIONS, Museum Store of The New Museum of Contemporary Art, New York, US Sens Giratoire Exposition Collective Peintures, Photographies, Installations PASSAGES, Centre d'Art Contemporain, Troyes, FR Ilona Ruegg, Kunsthalle Bern, Bern, CH Kunst und Schock Der 11, September und das Geheimnis des Anderen, Eine Austellung mit Bildern und Texten in Zusammenarbeit mit Lettre International, Haus am Lützoplatz, Berlin, DE Art Unlimited, Basel Art Fair, Basel, CH Les Horizons du Paysage, curated by François Montliau & Hubert Besacier, Maison de la Culture de Bourges, FR Ansammlungen von Ingrid Wald und Gerhard Jaschke («Freibord»), Sommerallerie, Unterretzbach, AT Out of Print Edição Esgotada, Museu Serralves, Museu de Art Contemporaneâ, Porto, PT De Concert, Oeuvres d'une Collection Privé, Frac des Pays de la Loire, FR What About Hegel (And You)-RRB-?
I really would like to see a much more serious effort to build an ensemble of possible outcomes and emissions pathways based on market forces, and different amounts of state interference in the market, just to see where these «BAU» cases will land.
One of the reasons the world is now running out of time to prevent dangerous climate change is because fossil fuel companies and their allies in the US Congress has prevented the United States from taking serious action on climate change since 1992 when the George H. W Bush administration agreed in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change that the United States should adopt policies and measures to prevent dangerous anthropocentric interference on climate change on the basis of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities.
While the brash brand of direct interference into the public discourse on scientific findings about global warming and associated harmful impacts we saw from Exxon operatives in the 1980s and 1990s has now morphed into a more passive, less - visible form of tampering — such as the company's continued stream of donations (some alleged to be illegal) to groups known for lobbying against and often shooting down federal and state - level proposals to promote renewable energy and limit carbon emissions — perhaps Avery will be able to persuade the new corporate leadership team to stop funding these groups altogether.
These are related to the preservation of the «international democratic order» both at the domestic level in terms of public participation and consultation on geoengineering and at the international level concerning interference in the affairs of sovereign states in accordance with Article 2 (7) of the United Nations Charter.
The 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change states as an objective the ``... stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.»
[20] In its judgment rendered on December 22, 2015, the Court stated that personal banking information is generally protected under Article 8 of the ECHR, but that an interference of this right is justifiable as long as the factors set out in Article 8 § 2 are met.
1 This appeal presents fundamental issues on the right of individuals to walk the streets free from state interference, but in recognition of the necessary role of the police in criminal investigation.
It states, in its article 10 on freedom of expression, that «this right shall include freedom... to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.»
A relatively new player, Vantage Asia Publishing Limited, based in Hong Kong, publishes the China Business Law Journal ten times a year; and publisher Kelley Fong is only too happy to state that the reason their head office is based in Hong Kong with a network of freelancers and contributors on the mainland is simply because this means less interference by other parties in the information they choose to publish.
Secured dismissal of action alleging breaches of fiduciary duties, conversion, fraud, tortious interference with expectancy, accounting, breach of contract, money had and received, and conspiracy in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim;
Representing PepsiCo, Inc. and Bottling Group, LLC in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, in litigation alleging claims under the Sherman Antitrust Act, the Robinson Patman Act, the Lanham Act and Iowa competition law, and for tortious interference, breach of fiduciary duty, business defamation and, on behalf of a putative class, breach of contract.
State tort claims based on enforcing a patent, including for tortious interference, are preempted by federal patent laws, unless the claimant can show that the patent holder acted in bad faith.
The paradigm case of such interference would be state - imposed duties on lawyers that conflict with or otherwise undermine compliance with the lawyer's duty of commitment to serving the client's legitimate interests.
1973 plainly overrides the restriction on interference in the internal affairs of a state (see Article 2 (7).
Litigation culminated in the 1987 Supreme Court decision in California v. Cabazon, which held that Indian tribes retained inherent sovereign authority to conduct gaming on Indian lands, free of state government interference.
Taking a context - sensitive approach that respects the unique nature of Aboriginal belief systems, it becomes clear that serious state interference with an Aboriginal sacred site (such as by permitting commercial or industrial activities on it) will usually violate section 2 (a).
(1) extending negligent misrepresentation beyond «business transactions» to product liability, unprecedented in Texas; (2) ignoring multiple US Supreme Court decisions that express and implied preemption operate independently (as discussed here) to dismiss implied preemption with nothing more than a cite to the Medtronic v. Lohr express preemption decision; (3) inventing some sort of state - law tort to second - guess the defendant following one FDA marketing approach (§ 510k clearance) over another (pre-market approval), unprecedented anywhere; (4) holding that the learned intermediary rule does not apply whenever a defendant «compensates» or «incentivizes» physicians to use its products, absent any Texas state or appellate authority; (5) imposing strict liability on an entity not in the product's chain of sale, contrary to Texas statute (§ 82.001 (2)-RRB-; (6) creating a claim for «tortious interference» with the physician - patient relationship, again utterly unprecedented; (7) creating «vicarious» breach of fiduciary duty for engaging doctors to serve as expert witnesses in mass tort litigation also involving their patients, ditto; and (8) construing a consulting agreement with a physician as «commercial bribery» to avoid the Texas cap on punitive damages, jaw - droppingly unprecedented.
• Leaving the scene of a crash resulting in property damage of more than $ 50.00 — 6 points s. 322.273 (d)(2), F.S. • Unlawful speed resulting in a crash — 6 points s. 322.273 (d)(3), F.S. • Reckless driving — 4 points s. 322.273 d1, F.S. • Any moving violation resulting in a crash — 4 points s. 322.273 (d)(8), F.S. • Passing a stopped school bus — 4 points s. 322.273 (d)(4), F.S. • Unlawful speed — 15 mph or more over the lawful or posted speed — 4 points s. 322.273 (d)(5b), • F.S. • Disregarding traffic / railroad signals — 4 points s. 322.273 (d)(6), F.S. • Any conviction under the Florida Statutes covering interference with an official traffic control device or railroad sign or signal — 4 points s. 322.273 (d)(10), F.S. • Unlawful speed — 15 mph or less over the lawful or posted speed — 3 points s. 322.273 (d)(5a), F.S. • All other moving violations (not including HOV and bicycle traffic violations but including seat belt violations and parking on highway outside the limits of municipalities) you just got yourself — 3 points s. 322.273 (d)(7), F.S. • A conviction under the Florida Litter Law — 3 points s. 322.273 (d)(9), F.S. • Any violations in other states count as the comparable amount of penalty points that an infraction would have accrued in Florida s. 322.273 (d) 10e), F.S. Florida law will notify any licensee, coming within their penalty point danger zone with a warning letter advising that any further convictions may result in loss of driving privileges.
The world feels anxious and divided, and Facebook has a lot of work to do — whether it's protecting our community from abuse and hate, defending against interference by nation states, or making sure that time spent on Facebook is time well spent.
One of the most widely known blockchain projects to date, Ethereum, states on its website that it enables the creation of decentralized applications that «run exactly as programmed without any possibility of downtime, censorship, fraud or third - party interference.»
In a more recent case, Globetrotter Software, Inc. v. Elan Computer Group, Inc., the court elaborated on the decision in Zenith by holding that an allegedly «bad faith» patent assertion must pass the «objective baselessness» standard to survive federal preemption of state - law counterclaims for tortious interference with prospective economic advantage and unfair competition.
The severity of the penalty for custodial interference in Arizona depends on who took the child, whether the child was returned prior to an arrest and whether the interference took place within or outside the state (child held outside of state).
SageGroup Associates v. Dominion Textile (USA)(244 A.D. 2d 281)-- the «able» prong of the ready, willing and able test refers to the prospective subtenant's financial ability; although broker established he procured a prospective subtenant ready, willing and able to sublet on terms set by the prospective sublessor, the parties» disagreement as to the terms of their oral agreement raised triable issues of fact precluding summary judgment in favor of either party; no cause of action exists in quantum meruit, unjust enrichment and account stated where there is an express contract governing the broker's right to a commission; broker lacks standing to claim tortious interference with contract against landlord for refusal to grant tenant permission to sublease because broker is neither a party to nor an intended beneficiary of the sublease rejected by the landlord.