Across the country, evaluating teachers partly based
on student test scores remains very controversial.
Not exact matches
The New York Times woke many with a start over the weekend when it reported in its Sunday edition
on a school in Arizona investing lots of money in technology but seemingly getting few results from the investment, as
student test scores remained stagnant.
The
students lucky enough to win the lottery and be admitted to a charter school subsequently
scored higher
on math and reading
tests than did those who lost the lottery and
remained in district schools.
Although more than half the
students who spend an extra year in the same grade and attend summer school improve their
scores on standardized
tests, the
remaining students held back continue to struggle.
In The Four - Day School Week, another School Administrator report, Jack McCoy, deputy director of learning services at the New Mexico Department of Education, said in his district's case attendance for teachers and
students improved while
scores on standardized achievement
tests remained stable.
[4] Recent research has concluded that public school
students who receive vouchers to attend private schools
score much lower
on both reading and math
tests than similar
students who
remain in the public schools.
This reliance
on decades - old reporting conventions has in some ways been exacerbated by new technologies because a percentage or diagnostic
score can be even more quickly calculated using digitized multiple - choice items that, though they may be «technologically enhanced,» still
remain rooted in designs for a summative
test rather than being designed formatively for
students as thinkers.
And yet, measures of school quality — largely based
on student standardized
test scores — have long
remained disappointingly narrow, unable to capture the full complexity of school quality.
The federal government has increased spending
on education by 300 % since ESEA was passed with nothing to show for it;
student test scores have
remained flat.
To help teachers successfully fulfill their role in this endeavor, effective teacher supervision and evaluation systems that inform teacher professional development and improve instruction are essential; however, disagreement over what those systems should measure
remains, and some researchers caution against relying
on student test scores as a valid metric (Baker et al, 2010)
Cuomo wants to change the current formula, which relies
on classroom observations for 60 percent of the teacher's rating,
student scores on state
tests for 20 percent and local measures for the
remaining 20 percent.
Twenty percent of the total 40 percent must be based
on how a
student improves
on state
test scores, and the
remaining 20 percent can be based
on scores on tests developed by an individual school district, or a third party, pending state approval.
We examined charter school effects
on test score growth overall, by charter type, and across four different cohorts of
students, only for those
students who
remain in a charter or traditional public school during the time series.
Yet even though the country's
scores on international exams are above average, they have
remained largely unchanged since the
tests were first administered in 2000, and the percentage of
students who were at least moderately proficient has decreased slightly in recent years.
TCTA also noted that while we appreciated that the bill eliminated the 1 percent cap
on the use of special education
student test scores on alternative assessments for AYP, we were concerned that the bill didn't address the
remaining 2 percent cap
on the use of special education
test scores on modified assessments for AYP, which we also wanted eliminated.
Therefore, making definitive claims about the outcomes of such programs
remains a challenging task.83 Some studies find no link between financial incentives for
student achievement and higher
test scores, while others see higher achievement for
students in systems with performance bonuses.84 A large - scale 2014 study
on TIF presented findings
on early implementation from 153 districts.
Flip through our complete summary of the high - quality empirical research conducted
on school choice programs to date, including evidence based
on students»
test scores (of those using programs and those who
remain in public schools), long - term educational attainment, integration / segregation, fiscal effects and
students» civic values.
On the contrary, the Duke report noted, comparable students who remain in public schools are scoring better than voucher students on national test
On the contrary, the Duke report noted, comparable
students who
remain in public schools are
scoring better than voucher
students on national test
on national
tests.
The number of
students scoring proficient
on elementary school math
tests remained flat at 86 percent.
Student test scores: Hunterdon
remained first for their performance
on state
tests in 8th and 11th grade, with pass rates of 91 and 95 percent, respectively.