Sentences with phrase «on subject knowledge»

After only a year helped to train new instructors, both on subject knowledge as well as how to lead effectively.

Bios for novelists are more personal than those for nonfiction authors, which focus more on subject knowledge and credentials.

«Like our professional development courses, which help to retain and develop teachers already in the profession, our teacher training programme will have a strong emphasis on subject knowledge and ensuring that teachers are confident experts in the classroom,» said Ms Counsell.

Many people across the sector have called for more in - depth knowledge in initial teacher training (ITT): more behaviour - management strategies, more focus on subject knowledge, and more special educational needs and disability (SEND) training.

Rather than observing teachers in lessons on their subject knowledge, subject associations should develop accredited programmes for them to attend.

Classification Evolution Circulatory and Respiratory Systems Light Electricity These all - in - one posters are perfect for children and teachers alike to brush up on their subject knowledge.

Living Things and Their Habitats The Digestive System and Teeth Materials Sound Electricity These all - in - one posters are perfect for children and teachers alike to brush up on their subject knowledge.

Not exact matches

Like a real babysitter, the pastel - trimmed iPal learns what your child likes and dislikes over time and, unlike a real babysitter, and constantly scrapes the cloud to «increase its knowledge on subjects of interest to your child.»

In November, Scaramucci, then running the hedge fund company he founded, SkyBridge Capital, appeared on knowledge forum Big Think where he espoused his best advice on the subject.

Although the company believes that such statements are based on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of its knowledge of its business and operations, the forward - looking statements are neither promises nor guarantees and they are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk.

It doesn't matter if the subject is starting an online business or Manchurian basket weaving, they have knowledge on the subject and look out, here it comes.

You can possess all of her knowledge on that subject in a 200 page book that can be read in a weekend.

Another test to measure confidence involves standing up in front of a panel of VonChurch employees and speaking for two minutes on a subject an applicant is passionate about, and one that also demonstrates he or she has technical knowledge.

Evelyn Jacks is Founder and President of Knowledge Bureau, a national educational institute for the continuing professional development of tax and financial advisors and author of 52 books on the subject of tax preparation, planning and wealth management for Canadian families.

When you combine passion and knowledge, you position yourself as an expert on the subject, attracting loyal readers.

For anyone looking for a refresher on the essentials or some help filling a knowledge gap, read on for a handy tutorial — and helpful resources — on the subject.

Busy entrepreneurs and business people starving for in - depth wisdom, knowledge and how - to advice on a host of important subjects — such as marketing, communication, direct mail, copywriting, personal finance, business systems, and organization — feast monthly on illuminating audio interviews conducted by Joe Polish, President of Piranha Marketing, and the creator of Genius Network ™ Interview Series.

When I'm not covering the subjects for work, I'm putting the knowledge to use on the renovation of a Brooklyn brownstone, where I live with my wife and kids.

We have met with Tobias on several occasions and the knowledge he possesses when it comes to lithium and cobalt beats anyone we have ever talked to on the subject.

Trust me, I have a little knowledge on the subject.

If you want to speak on a subject get some knowledge on it first.

Though by no means an expert on AIDS, I have more than a casual knowledge of and interest in the subject.

Many have no more depth to their knowledge on the subject than what they could learn on Wikipedia.

I am glad we still have people working in this direction and sharing it all with us, the ones who are doing nothing other than negatively criticize and expose our opinions on subjects we do not have any knowledge.

YOU:: Shld the modern world ignore the new knowledge that's available to us on the subject of human sexuality?

Shld the modern world ignore the new knowledge that's available to us on the subject of human sexuality?

I think this really says it all about your level of knowledge on the subject.

There are reports of OFSTED inspectors demanding that schools impose a weird agenda on children, teaching that it is possible for a boy to become a girl and vice versa, that sexual identity is not something specific, that all our knowledge of biology on this subject has been wrong.

jr is right, but most Christians, including ministers, have little knowledge on this subject or are simply afraid of it... and well they should be if they are ignorant about the subject.

small words from someone who can't conjure up a better argument due to their own lack of knowledge on the bible's subject material.

In the Abbasid period Muslim culture became society - oriented, with emphasis on such subjects as the sciences and engineering and architecture; but no contradiction was felt between these fields and religion, for all scholars combined religious knowledge with mastery of other fields of learning.

Very few of those people have any understanding of the history or have any non-theology education or knowledge on the subject.

I have concluded that the experience of CE does not in itself have objective epistemic significance, because whether it is reliable is an open question and it is not self - justifying Furthermore even if taking the experience of CE as veridical is justified systematically by the direct perception underwritten by prehension, nevertheless the sense in which such direct perception is reliable is epistemically disappointing, since it is external to the subject and does not necessarily involve any propositional knowledge on its part.

Even if you do not personally «see» anyone in «need» these comments about people being «lazy» is just a lack of knowledge on the subject.

You should start by evaluating how little a knowledge base you have to discuss a subject on, because otherwise it becomes difficult to even tell what a good source would be.

In an encyclopedia of the modern Islamic world, one would expect the authors to show some knowledge of the previous work on the subject.

On reflection we can see that the above argument for the internal relatedness of God as cognitive subject presupposes that there are alternative possibilities for God, at least with respect to what creatures, or what states of creatures, He has as objects of knowledge.

If one asks how the subject knows the object, one has in brief form the essence of theory of knowledge from Plato to Bergson; the differences between the many schools of philosophy can all be understood as variations on this theme.

Either one of us could «school» you on the subject, so your presumption of superior knowledge is a bit amusing.

I disregard his work because of my knowledge on the subject and the fact that he is a proven liar, supported only by other ID proponents.

While well - acquainted with the tradition of philosophical reflection on the soul and its relationship to the body, Fr Selman's knowledge of recent scientific research relevant to his subject appears less impressive and his terminology, and even some of his ideas and arguments, can therefore appear outdated or irrelevant.

I've been interacting a bit here over the past day, and I've only had ONE atheist / skeptic show a glimpse of knowledge on the subject - matter we were discussing (which happened to be biology).

Atheist Terry Eagleton wrote a review for the London Review of Books entitled «Lunging, Flailing, Mispunching» that began with the memorable quote: «Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology.»

The sophisms of the substantiality of the «I» even today retain a particular luster, along with the Nietzschean and Freudian critiques of the subject; it is not without importance to find the root and philosophical meaning of them in the Kantian dialectic; this latter has condemned in advance any claim to dogmatize on personal existence and knowledge of the person; the person is manifested only in the practical act of treating it as an end and not merely as a means.

For far from being a deviation from biblical truth, this setting of man over against the sum total of things, his subject - status and the object - status and mutual externality of things themselves, are posited in the very idea of creation and of man's position vis - a-vis nature determined by it: it is the condition of man meant in the Bible, imposed by his createdness, to be accepted, acted through... In short, there are degrees of objectification... the question is not how to devise an adequate language for theology, but how to keep its necessary inadequacy transparent for what is to be indicated by it...» Hans Jonas, Phenomenon of Life, pp. 258 - 59; cf. also Schubert Ogden's helpful discussion on «Theology and Objectivity,» Journal of Religion 45 (1965): 175 - 95; Ian G. Barbour, Issues in Science and Religion (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice - Hall, 1966), pp. 175 - 206; and Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).

Secondly, You are quite convinced YOU are correct so maybe you should just NOT HAVE AN OPINION ON THE SUBJECT and stay coherent to your philosophy, unless you have some secret knowledge.

This is at least the third time I've read where you've referenced South Park for knowledge on a subject!

You said,» This is at least the third time I've read where you've referenced South Park for knowledge on a subject!»

Thus it follows from the principle which equates immediacy of experience with certainty of knowledge that there can be no legitimate perspective on the world by an individual subject from a point of view outside that subject, a point of view which places the subject within a larger — «objective» — context.

Current medical knowledge about homosexuality seems to contradict the attitudes of the Christian churches on the subject.