Sentences with phrase «on subjects taught»

The discussions will focus on subjects taught in the current module.
• Students require to have a great knowledge on the subjects taught in their university as a result to score the highest grades.
We looked at data from the School Workforce Census on the subjects taught at secondary schools and the number of hours spent teaching each subject.
For the majority of teachers, whose students don't take a state test on the subject they teach, gains would be measured by students» gains from a spring or fall pre-test to a spring post-test in their subject.
Results indicated professional development based in reform delivery methods (not workshops or short trainings), occurred over time with more than 25 hours of content involved groups of teachers learning together, was focused on the subject taught by the teacher, required teachers to be active participants in their learning, and cohorent, i.e., aligned with standards and teacher goals, was more likely to lead to increases in teacher knowledge and changes in practice.
Adult and continuing education professionals» salaries vary based on the subject taught as well as the teacher's education and experience.

Not exact matches

Hassler's pick on this subject is Why Didn't They Teach Me This in School?
My company, Poshly, prides itself on hiring subject - matter experts across various competency areas so employees can come together to teach and share with one another.
Once the pre-work is completed, on - site training allows the leadership team and subject matter experts to teach in a workshop - based environment that focuses on the application of basic skills to real - world situations.
This is followed by two full weeks of on - site training at our Austin headquarters, which allows our executive team and subject matter experts to teach in a workshop - based environment that focuses on applying basic skills to real - world situations.
While he used to teach on this subject in the City, he would now rather concentrate on actual investment analysis, but does explain his investment choices and discusses investment ideas at newsletters.advfn.com/deepvalueshares.
Anyone can find the Church's teaching on this subject.
At the end of the day, though, it is hard to believe that the fundamental force behind the execration by the world amounts to a phrase here and there in Humanae Vitae» or in Augustine, or in Thomas Aquinas, or in anywhere else in the long history of Christian teaching on the subject.
That is the teaching of every Pope who has spoken on the subject, affirmed by bishops in union with him.
You say that you know Christs * true * teachings, then condemn someone for writing on the subject without being self - righteous.
And those places are misleading you because the people doing the teaching is not qualified to even teach on the subject.
It would be hard to say, based on his teaching, that subjecting oneself to fear of zombies is immoral while subjecting oneself to fear of Nazis, Grendel, and Iago is not.
There was an excellent discussion on Delaware public television on the subject of Joe Biden, Catholic teaching on abortion, and Catholic voters.
These questions define the subject matter of the study of divinity, and Christians have believed through the ages that these questions can be adequately answered only as each generation appropriates the teaching passed on by the original witnesses of God's self - revelation in the life, death, and resurrection of Christ.
I believe it is helpful to educate the student not just on the subject being taught... in this case English... but to educate them on the process.
That is almost all they have been taught on the subject.
Dalahäst Well, if you aren't following Paul's clear teaching on the subject, why shouldn't I assume that you're not just cherry picking teachings based on what you feel like following?
On the contrary, from 1912 to 1933, Whitehead persistently lectured to learned societies, calling their attention to the importance of the teaching of the relevant subject - matter.
Your statement that «all the comments on this subject (concerning atheists) do not come from happy people... who despise, are upset, have nothing, are not thankful and... have nothing to live for» goes against the very way that both Jesus and the apostles taught when speaking with individuals who do not share their view.
Instead, why don't you teach your children to study hard and get a good education at a «real» college where they can learn «real» subjects like biology and astrophysics, instead of relying on a priest or a minister to teach them that mythical being created man and the universe?
There are reports of OFSTED inspectors demanding that schools impose a weird agenda on children, teaching that it is possible for a boy to become a girl and vice versa, that sexual identity is not something specific, that all our knowledge of biology on this subject has been wrong.
Also, if you want to learn more about economic inequality ahead of the event (or won't be able to attend the event), Cornel West — prominent intellectual, author, and cultural critic — will teach an online course on the subject in conjunction with ChurchNext, which is open to all from January 11 - 21.
Although broader in scope and perspective than the other works we are mentioning here (the author is a historical theologian) and therefore not giving so much detail on the teaching of Jesus, this is probably the best encyclopedia article on the subject in English.
(iii) you are a complete blowhard who has never studied one subject of university level biology, never been on an archaeological dig, never studied a thing about paleontology, geology, astronomy, linguistics or archaeology, but feel perfectly sure that you know more than the best biologists, archaeologists, paleontologists, doctors, astronomers botanists and linguists in the World because your mommy and daddy taught you some comforting stories from Bronze Age Palestine as a child.
The present volume is really a collection of studies, and it might easily have grown to twice its size if other topics had been included: for example the miracle stories — I should have liked to examine Alan Richardson's new book on The Miracle - Stories of the Gospels (1942)-- or a fuller study of the so - called messianic consciousness of Jesus, the theory of interim ethics, the relation of eschatology and ethics in Jesus» teachings — see Professor Amos N. Wilder's book on the subject, Eschatology and Ethics in the Teaching of Jesus (1939)-- the influence of the Old Testament upon the earliest interpretation of the life of Jesus — see Professor David E. Adams» new book, Man of God (1941), and Professor E. W. K. Mould's The World - View of Jesus (1941)-- or sonic of the topics treated in the new volume of essays presented to Professor William Jackson Lowstuter, New Testament Studies (1942), edited by Professor Edwin Prince Booth.
The likelihood that Jesus never mentioned or taught on the subject seems slim.
For one whose whole ministry has been spent theological teaching it may seem presumptuous to speak on the subject of preaching.
Yes, you are right that Jesus may have taught something on the subject and it just wasn't recorded for us in Scripture.
I have a hunch that this type of book is quite rare, because its subject matter is homosexuality and the struggle involved in «being gay» as well as embracing orthodox Christianity's teaching on the homosexual orientation.
But... despite all their hard thinking about educational method and styles of teaching, and despite the bewildering multiplicity of subjects embraced in their higher culture, none of them really understood the assumptions on which his profession was based.»
There is no one teaching on this subject in the Bible.
Also, the Church teaches us that the subject of our earthly offerings can redirect them to where they are better needed (world peace, those who are not living a holy life here on Earth, etc.).
Critiques offered in such responses more often than not say more about the critic's adherence or not to the Church's teaching on the subject in question than they do about the incessant nature of discussing the topic or its complexity.
Writing on the subject of Arminianism, Piper asks, «But how should we regard these errors in relationship to the teaching office of the church and other institutions?»
Yet despite the churches» traditional teaching on the subject, the demand to reject all forms of discrimination seems likely to lead to growing acceptance of different lifestyles and patterns of relationship, although this is already a divisive matter between conservative and more liberal Christians.
actually you do nt have to prove the many deities or Gods that they really exist, because they really had existed in their times, They are part of the evolutionary process for us humans to transcend to higher consciousness.To simplify the analogy, when we were young and we are in the lower grade school, we were taught simple subjects not advance literatures but simple stories even mythicals, The same with religion, thousands of years ago when there was no science yet, primitive people had a religion, of course man made faiths to conform with their state of mind or intellect.But later atfter thousands of years we evolve into a more educated people and so new concept of God again was presented to them, another man made concept, and this go on and on, until a few thiousand years ago.monotheism, Judaism, christianity, islam, buddhism, etc also evolved, But with the accelerated evolution, these faith again is threatend with obsolesencs because of of scientific developments and education.In panthroteistic faith, the future religion needs to conform to evolutionary process, This proves that God is always there guiding the change.And it his will that made this a reality in history since the begining of the universe 13 billion years ago, and this will continue to exist until He will completely fulfill His will to infinity, Thats PANTHROTHEISM, the futue, man made religion under His guidance through scientifiic evoluition after the Bi Bang
In addition, as I have stated before, I do not teach and I can not understand why you believe offering an opinion on a subject is teaching.
The word doctrine is therefore being used in a way that is flexible enough to accommodate the variety of biblical teaching on these and other subjects as well as the factor of development in some themes as we move from the Old Testament into the New Testament.
A wise interpreter would set this verse aside as too vague and unclear on this particular issue and seek Biblical truth on this subject in the clear passages throughout the Bible that teach that God does not hold children to account for the sins of their parents!
I have some strong views on the subject, based on my adherence to what I believe is the Bible's teachings on the subject.
Your comment indicates that you don't understand evolution and would have benefited from more teaching on the subject as a child.
Teaching is the activity of a person who can teach, yet the operation is performed [on] some patient — it is not cut adrift from a subject, but is of A on B» (202b6 - 8).
The RCC, the Anglican church, the Mormon church, the various Orthodox christian churches, the churches of the «prosperity gospel», et al are all exceptionally wealthy and although they do some good works, they clearly put wealth and power ahead of Jesus» teachings on the subject.
In essence, tradition means neither theologoumena ecclesiastically imposed nor superstitions ecclesiastically sanctioned (the common Protestant stereotype), but the sum of attempts down through the ages to expound and apply biblical teaching on specific subjects.
In Mark, 25 percent of the verbs have Jesus as the subject, and 20 percent more are spoken by him in teaching and parables; in Matthew and Luke, around 58 percent of the verbs have Jesus as the subject or capture the teaching and parables of Jesus; and about half of the verbs in John have Jesus as the subject or are on his lips, with a massive 10 percent of those being spoken by Jesus about himself.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z