How much detail you give
on His substitutionary death (and His finished work) and resurrection depends on the time you have, the prior knowledge of the person you are talking with, and the flow of the conversation.
It still focuses
on the substitutionary death of Christ?
When all you've got is an English Literature degree and they're asking you to comment
on substitutionary atonement at Christian colleges and church trends on CNN, something's gone amiss.]
There is less emphasis
on substitutionary atonement, with greater openness towards pluralist views of salvation and a liberal view of morality.
If you have some extra reading time this week and are curious about N.T. Wright and the New Perspectives on Paul, check out this lengthy (and older) article by Wright that clarifies his position
on substitutionary atonement.
Not exact matches
Grace is imputed in full
on the basis of and as a result of the
substitutionary atonement of Christ crucified for my original sin and that of the whole world.
Meanwhile, Protestants / evangelicals have focused
on justification,
substitutionary atonement (while folks in the pew have focused
on a transaction, decision, etc to get others to invite Jesus into their hearts.
First they lose faith in the 6 - day creationist god, then in the bible - dictation god, then in the male - supremacy god, then in the european - supremacy / western - civilization / colonialist god, then in the anti-gay god, then in the pro-war god, then in the American - exceptionalism / manifest - destiny god, then in the anti-palestinian god, then in the controller - of - everything - that - happens god, then in the design - engineer god, then in the penal -
substitutionary - atonement god, and so
on.
Designed to test Warren's doctrine
on everything from the sovereignty of God, to unconditional election, to
substitutionary atonement, to homosexuality, the interview was seen by Piper as proof that Rick Warren was indeed a «doctrinally sound» evangelist.
Signs and wonders do not save; only Jesus and His
substitutionary work
on the cross saves.
You could tell someone to believe in Jesus for everlasting life without ever mentioning sin, spiritual death, a
substitutionary atonement since these are just fluff or evidences yet they might be a stumbling block so if you just harp
on eternal life isn't that neglecting the death and resurrection.
And this sermon includes every gospel fancy (depending
on your sect of course) from the
substitutionary atonement with its imagined acceptance with god through christ (which intrinsically includes the christian blather about sin and moral obligation!)
I believe Jesus is the Son of God, born of a virgin, lived a sinless life, died a
substitutionary death
on the Cross, was buried, rose again, and will come again as he said.
The implications of this alternative counseling service provided for church members must be considered in evaluating the effect of paid - time religious programs
on the life of the local church: is it a complementary service or a
substitutionary one?
Have you written
on the Christus Victor view or the Penal
Substitutionary view?
That extra theological information explicitly includes «the cross» or «Christ's
substitutionary atonement» or the insistance
on telling the unsaved the must believe «Jesus died for your sins» as an essential element of the saving message that must be believed for salvation.
For example, to include Christ's
substitutionary death
on the cross in a Gospel presentation is adding to the Gospel (the Gospel always being defined as belief
on the Lord Jesus Christ results in eternal life).
Then he has a chapter
on how the Penal
Substitutionary view of the atonement leads to some bad theology about God and our sin.