Sentences with phrase «on synoptic»

Carbon dioxide has quite a different pernicious influence — not on the climate but on synoptic activity.

The chance of a return to prolonged south westerlies is low but it could happen depending on the synoptic situation over USA.

Impact of Arctic treeline on synoptic climate.

The sharpening of pressure gradient (reduction in the isobar separation) associated with the warm conveyor belt is usually obvious on a synoptic chart.

Wang, C. - C., and G. Magnusdottir, 2006: The ITCZ in the Central and Eastern Pacific on Synoptic Timescales.

Yes wind shear, and weather systems etc. are important but they are largely internal to the atmosphere and dependent on the synoptic situation.

The criterion of dissimilarity we have formulated was not reached on the basis of theoretical considerations, although it can he defended on this basis, but in the course of practical work on the synoptic tradition.

In this study I shall depend almost entirely on the Synoptic Gospels, referring to John only when there is some special reason to do so.

Not exact matches

What fishon fails to realize is the teachings of the NT (synoptics for sure) are based on teachings of the Torah (5 books of the law)... he does not understand law and the debating of law for the formation of understanding the idea better.

This introduces a series of miracles beginning with the second nature miracle in the Synoptic Gospels, the stilling of a storm on the Sea of Galilee (Mk 4:37 - 41; Mt 8:23 - 27; Lk 8:22 - 25).

All this is basic to contemporary work on the theology of the synoptic evangelists and their tradition; indeed, this contemporary work is consciously built upon the foundations laid by Bultmann in this most important book.

In what follows we shall go on to think of the Gospel in the Synoptic Gospels, in John, in Paul, in Peter, in James, in Hebrews, in the letters of John, in II Peter and in Jude, and in the Revelation; but it is of the first importance to remember that we are not dealing with a series of Gospels competing with one another for our allegiance.

In this pioneer form - critical work the first attempt was made to write a history of the synoptic tradition and to isolate the influences at work in and on that tradition as it changed and developed.

In the Synoptic Gospels — Matthew, Mark, and Luke faith is a humble, hearty confidence in God's power and goodness and a potent laying hold on his proffered help.

Here we have some influence of the synoptic tradition on John, Luke (in Acts) and Paul.

Even the synoptic gospels having differences in them because they were passed verbally passed on for decades before they were written down.

A reasonable explanation is that usages of Kingdom of God characteristic of the teaching of Jesus and not of the early Church live on in the synoptic tradition.

New Testament letters are put into the context of synoptic Gospel narratives about Jesus and construed as comment on those narratives drawing practical implications regarding who the church is and what appropriate response to God's presence is.

It can be seen from the above that there are real differences between the synoptic tradition on the one hand and the remainder of the New Testament on the other, as far as the usage of Kingdom of God is concerned.

If some synoptic or universal vision is thereby attained, it will necessarily be a provisional grasp of unity, based on the structure of experience interpreted within some particular epoch in the ongoing adventures of actual entities.

Steve... I think we're floggin» a dead horse here, but for what it's worth, understand that I'm not trying to convince you to think like I do, rather I wd hope that room wd be made for many theological differences.To think discuss and debate theology is well supported by the New Testament and history, and is perfectly within the bounds of what it means to engage our minds with the subject at hand.Theologians and biblical scholars have done this very thing for centuries, revealing a plethora of opinion on the evolving world of biblical studies.Many capable authors have written and debated the common themes as well as the differences between Paul, John, Jesus, the synoptics, etc..

Prior to the time of the early church father Augustine, there is little evidence of discussion on the relationship of the synoptic gospels... and on side note of text book p. 47..

The Synoptic Jesus» focus on the urgency of human readiness to receive God's promised basileia on earth is a subject of much scholarly debate regarding the tension between the signs of its arrival — the blind see, the crippled walk, as proleptic manifestations of Jesus» mediation of God's rule here and now — and the promise of a fullness of that reign yet to be consummated.

In addition to these gospels, scholars have discovered a second - century papyrus which contains episodes in the life of Jesus and some sayings ascribed to him; these materials seem to be based on John and the synoptics, along with some extraneous legends.

■ The synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) indicate that Jesus died before nightfall on the 15th day of Nisan; right before the start of the Passover meal.

In another sense the future event (which the synoptics emphasized more than John does) is merely a completion of the movement from sin to forgiveness, unbelief to belief, that is going on here and now, in the person and presence of the Son of man (5:27), Jesus himself.

And like the fact that many in the church (especially in evangelical circles) have narrow - mindedly focused on one report in John of Jesus telling someone they need to be born again, overlooking Jesus» constant call throughout the synoptics to follow Him in the process?

This section also begins with two miracles from the synoptic tradition, and proceeds to a discourse based on them.

In the synoptics, however, and especially in Mark, focusing on Jesus reveals something quite curious: it is a quality of the Messiah to do something very like what John the Baptist does here.

15:5) have been lost because they told of Jesus» exaltation to God and on account of that were not sufficiently realistic in the eyes of a later generation... The view that the event of Easter was the appointment to heavenly glory can still be traced behind the Synoptic tradition of the resurrection.»

Narrative materials, on the other hand, such as are found in the Synoptic Gospels, present more of the historical account.

and the views of contemporary scholarship on the theological motivation of Mark, and of the other synoptic evangelists and their traditions, are readily available.

The term «messiah» or «king» occurs on Jesus» own lips in the Synoptic Gospels only 13 times (39 times elsewhere), whereas, as we have seen, «son of man» is found 69 times (and not once elsewhere).

Other work on the history of the synoptic tradition will be mentioned in the course of our own work; at this point our concern is simply to argue that the reconstruction of the teaching of Jesus must begin by attempting to write a history of the synoptic tradition.

We can appeal to the work of Bultmann and Jeremias on the history of the tradition; we can appeal to the recent work on the theology of the synoptic evangelists and their tradition; and, as we shall see in our work below, the acceptance of this hypothesis as a working hypothesis is validated over and over again by the results achieved in individual instances.

Already in the History of the Synoptic Tradition we find traces of this, because it is noticeable that when he is grouping together sayings which reflect one of these characteristics, Bultmann shows no great concern if some of them are dubious on other grounds, although he will note the possibility in passing.

We, at any rate, have no hesitation in basing our work on the two - source hypothesis, with suitable recognition of the possibility of the continuing existence and influence of synoptic - type tradition alongside the synoptic gospels themselves all through the period that concerns us.

Catastrophic so far as the overall impact of Gerhardsson's work is concerned is that in a book having some 325 pages of text, only twelve of those pages are devoted to a discussion of the gospel tradition itself (pp. 324 — 35), and these pages include no exegesis whatever of the text of the synoptic tradition on the basis of his hypothesis.

Rabbinic Judaism has a respect for the text and content of that which was being passed on, and in this respect is absolutely different from the freely creative nature of the synoptic tradition.

We shall return to Jeremias's work on the parables again and again, for it is epoch - making in several respects, but for the moment we want only to call attention to the consequences of this work so far as a general view of the nature of the synoptic tradition is concerned the success of Jeremias's work demands that we accept his starting - point, namely, that any parable as it now stands in the gospels represents the teaching of the early Church and the way back from the early Church to the historical Jesus is a long and arduous one.

On the basis of a surer knowledge of the synoptic tradition, and of more and more work on the Johannine, it may one day be possible to make use of the fourth gospel in the reconstruction of the teaching of Jesus, but that day is not yeOn the basis of a surer knowledge of the synoptic tradition, and of more and more work on the Johannine, it may one day be possible to make use of the fourth gospel in the reconstruction of the teaching of Jesus, but that day is not yeon the Johannine, it may one day be possible to make use of the fourth gospel in the reconstruction of the teaching of Jesus, but that day is not yet.

It is hardly coincidental that this passage was not accepted into the other two Synoptic Gospels dependent on Mark.

In the past, this has tended to be overstated; on the basis of the fact that Jesus certainly taught in Aramaic, and on the assumption that when we had reached one step behind the tradition in our synoptic sources we had reached the teaching of Jesus, it was sometimes assumed that an Aramaism represented the voice of Jesus.

It becomes apparent that many of the details in the synoptic accounts are paralleled in the Hellenistic literature; that Christian writers did use Hellenistic models can be seen quite clearly in the apocryphal Acts of Peter, where the author improves on a version of a story similar to that told by Philostratus.

It has always to be remembered that no one in the early Church regarded the changes going on in the synoptic - type Jesus - tradition as due to anything other than the influence of the risen Lord.

I and its parallels, and in view also of what we have claimed to be the success of the total contemporary approach to the synoptic tradition in which these variations are accounted for on the assumption that they are due to, and a source of knowledge of, the theology of the evangelist or redactor concerned, we claim that we are entirely justified in challenging Gerhardsson to produce an exegesis of some sets of parallel sayings as evidence for his hypothesis, as we are prepared to do as evidence for ours.

In the Synoptic Gospels, the primary focus of Jesus» message is on the impending arrival of the eschatological Reign of God — basileia tou theou, as we saw in Chapter Two.

We tend to want modern journalism, but the gospels resist that yoke, thus we need to be careful when we say the following about events recorded,» it happened like this»... another gospel might have a different take on the same incident (even the synoptics).

what's yr opinion on the differences between the synoptics and John if the following quote accurately describes the problem....

The Book of Revelation, for example, is at odds with the Synoptic Gospels in having not one resurrection, but two, with a millennial reign of the Messiah on earth between them.