Not exact matches
If you purchase shares of our common stock in this offering, you will experience immediate and substantial dilution of $ in the net
tangible book value per share, assuming an initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth
on the front cover of this prospectus).
The initial public offering price is substantially higher than the pro forma net
tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately following this offering based
on the total
value of our
tangible assets less our total liabilities.
The assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the estimated offering price range set forth
on the cover page of this prospectus, is substantially higher than the net
tangible book value per share of our outstanding common stock immediately after this offering.
Therefore, if you purchase our common stock in this offering, you will incur an immediate dilution of $ in net
tangible book value per share from the price you paid, based
on an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth
on the cover of this prospectus).
When paying service fees up front, you should see
tangible value provided in the form of e-
book production,
book design, editorial help, ongoing administration and title management, and so
on.
In fact, at a 75 % discount to growth
on price - to -
tangible book value — two standard deviations below the average long - term level —
value hasn't been this cheap relative to growth since the peak of the» dotcom» bubble.2 But, is this unpopularity permanent?
I'm doing a lot of work
on bank stocks lately, looking at a lot of cheap stocks selling for significantly less than their
tangible book value.
Based
on June 2015, the
tangible book value was at $ 9.54 a share, September 2015 is $ 1.63... I wonder what makes his significant drop.
Interesting and sometimes compelling idea that may be very illiquid, may be a probability bet with a favourable asymmetrical reward to risk ratio, or may simply be a low quality business that is very cheap relative
on a net - net working capital or price /
tangible book value basis.
There are two quick down and dirty ways to assess stocks
on a fundamental basis: Cash Flow (Operating Company) &
Tangible Book Value (Asset Based Company).
I've found that it is difficult to impossible to find any research examining the performance of stocks selected
on the basis of price - to -
tangible book value.
If anyone knows of any study explicitly examining the performance of stocks selected
on the basis of price - to -
tangible book value, please shoot me an email at greenbackd at gmail or leave a comment in this post.
Stocks were selected and held only if they appeared undervalued based
on ratios like price to earnings, price to «owner earnings» (similar to free cash flow), enterprise
value to operating earnings, and price to
tangible book.
Our net
tangible book value at March 31, 2012 was $ 0.24 per share and was determined by dividing our actual net
tangible book value (total
book value of
tangible assets less total liabilities)
on that date, by the number of outstanding shares (1,249,446)
on March 31, 2012.
And, if I can be so radical, we begin ignoring earnings and focus
on growth
tangible book value per share.
It is rare that the judges allow deals to go out at less than
tangible book value, particularly
on short - tailed P&C companies with little insolvency risk.
[NB: i) Church House's Argo stake is held by the Deep
Value Investments Fund, managed by Jeroen Bos — if you haven't read it already, I can highly recommend his recent
book «Deep
Value Investing», ii) XXX Capital Management is a well - known European hedge fund, which hasn't publicly disclosed a holding in Argo to date, hence the redaction — Argo management are obviously aware of their shareholding & support, and iii) the letter was based
on a GBP 14p share price & a higher GBP / USD rate — at the current 13.875 p price and exchange rate, Argo now trades at a 36 % discount to net cash and investments, and a 47 % discount to net
tangible assets.]
I determine the
tangible book value per share of a company (whether supplied
on the annual report or not) for each company that I analyze.
However, I am not averse to traditional
value plays based
on discount to
tangible book when the opportunity arises.
The shares are also priced at 1.95 x
tangible book value so investors should get 20.11 / 1.95 = 10.31 % return
on the equity they hold per share.