Not exact matches
The Obama agenda has focused almost exclusively
on systemic school reform to address the achievement deficits of disadvantaged students:
standards, testing,
teacher evaluations, and a continued, if different, focus
on accountability.
Regents ease some testing and
evaluation requirements, allowing
teachers rated «ineffective» who face firing a chance to appeal
on grounds they were not prepared to give lessons based
on Common Core
standards.
A task force by New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is reversing a number of policies in the Common Core
standards, including parts of a measure
on teacher evaluations pushed by Cuomo less than a year ago.
It came after a cascade of dissent from parents and
teachers, steadily growing since tests aligned with the Common Core academic
standards were introduced into classrooms in the 2012 - 13 school year and since the state toughened its
evaluation laws, with an increasing amount of educators» job ratings linked to student performance
on exams.
The vacancies
on the board come after Regents backed a plan to place a moratorium
on linking Common Core - based test results to
teacher performance
evaluations as the
standards are being studied and potentially revised in New York.
Senate Democrats aren't the only ones seeking changes to what was approved in the budget: Republicans and Democrats in both chambers have introduced bills aimed at extending the deadline for developing regulations for the
teacher evaluations as well unlinking the enactment of the
standards on the local level to a boost in school aid.
Cuomo's task force
on academic
standards and testing expects to hand in its much anticipated report this month, amid a continuing push by
teachers unions to end the use of student test scores in
teacher evaluations.
But her stance
on Common Core could factor into Rosa's relationship with state Education Commissioner MaryEllen Elia, who has supported the move toward higher
standards, as well as the use of student test scores in
teacher evaluations.
ALBANY — Governor Andrew Cuomo suggested he won't sign a «safety net» bill that would shield educators from consequences of the rough rollout of the Common Core
standards in New York, citing new
teacher -
evaluation data released
on Tuesday.
«We have to deal with the issue of the effect of Common Core testing
on teacher evaluations,» Cuomo said Tuesday at a news conference
on the state budget, referring to the tougher curriculum
standards adopted by the state that produced sharply lower scores
on standardized tests in New York last year.
«We must not allow criticism manufactured by special interests to turn back the clock
on teacher evaluations and higher
standards,» StudentsFirstNY executive director Jenny Sedlis said.
Yet, she told a Senate Education Committee hearing
on the state's new Common Core
standards, under the new rules, even she could not score a rating of highly effective in the new
teacher evaluations.
Tisch, who talks as tough a game as anyone
on education
standards and
teacher evaluations, somehow always manages to resolve issues in ways that the state's fundamentally corrupt
teachers unions find unobjectionable.
But it's more than the Common Core learning
standards themselves, a bulk of controversy lies
on issues with testing tied to the
teacher evaluation system.
Cuomo
on Wednesday is also expected to outline an aggressive education reform agenda that will include a push for more charter schools and additional funding for them, tougher
teacher evaluation standards, and money for
teacher incentives.
«Mr. Cuomo's adversarial stance toward
teachers borders
on disdain,» Astorino wrote of the series of battles Cuomo has had with
teachers over everything from Common Core educational
standards to an
evaluation system to the level of state aid to public schools.
A task force by Gov. Andrew Cuomo is reversing a number of policies in the Common Core
standards, including parts of a measure
on teacher evaluations pushed by Cuomo less than a year ago.
Lately the Governor has not commented
on the
teacher evaluations, though he did issue a video announcing a new commission to revisit the Common Core learning
standards, which are related to the new
teacher performance rules.
For years, Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo took a hard - line approach to reforming New York's schools, calling
on the state to mandate rigorous
evaluations for
teachers and to turn schools that fail to meet certain
standards over to an outside receiver to operate.
Rosa, who has been outspoken
on testing and
teacher evaluations issues, may clash with state education commissioner MaryEllen Elia, who was hired under the leadership of Tisch and supports high
standards and state testing for data purposes.
Magee has become central to the statewide effort to battle reforms such as standardized testing,
teacher evaluations based
on test scores and penalties for schools that do not meet certain
standards.
In this view, Cuomo will cave
on most of his other proposals — like merit pay and stiffer
teacher evaluation standards — as long as he gets a higher cap
on the number of charter schools in the state.
The new
evaluation system will provide clear
standards and significant guidance to local school districts for implementation of
teacher evaluations based
on multiple measures of performance including student achievement and rigorous classroom observations.
A champion of the Common Core learning
standards, Dr. Tisch, 60, pushed for the creation of new, harder tests based
on those
standards and for
teacher evaluations tied to students» performance
on the exams.
The New York State Board of Regents is expected to act
on two committee reports Tuesday, calling for a delay the impact of Common Core - related state assessments
on educators and students and reducing the level of local school district testing associated with the new
teacher evaluation law and higher
standards for teaching and learning.
Ritz and her backers opposed Bennett
on many grounds, including his positions in favor of
teacher evaluation and vouchers, but she also attracted some support from conservatives who had opposed his stance
on the
standards.
Among the places considering, piloting, or implementing
teacher -
evaluation systems based at least in part
on a set of performance - based
standards are Ann Arbor, Mich.; Chicago; the District of Columbia; Elgin and Rockford, Ill.; Prince George's County, Md.; and select districts in states such as Idaho, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
But the same principals, when asked to evaluate the
teachers formally as part of the state's mandatory
evaluation system, gave fewer than 3 % of their
teachers a less than «effective» score
on any of the seven
standards against which they were judged.
Last week, Gates Foundation education chief Vicki Phillips wrote a «letter to our partners» urging that states give students and
teachers time to adjust to the new Common Core
standards before using those
standards as factors «in high - stakes decisions
on teacher evaluation or student promotion for the next two years, during this transition.»
The union is using the
standards as an excise to call for a moratorium
on teacher evaluations as states move to Common Core — aligned tests.
The
teacher evaluation program that is in place in Los Angeles, according to the petition, «does not comply with the Stull Act» and «perpetuates a fraud
on the community» by letting
teachers get high
evaluation ratings whether or not their students are learning the material listed in the curriculum - content
standards.
Duncan has used waivers and Race to the Top, often at the enthusiastic behest of its state and local allies, to have Washington take the lead
on everything from
teacher evaluation to state
standards — sometimes in direct contravention of statute.
In exchange for that flexibility, the administration will require states to adopt
standards for college and career readiness, focus improvement efforts
on 15 percent of the most troubled schools, and create guidelines for
teacher evaluations based in part
on student performance.
In an analysis of the program, political scientist William Howell wrote that RttT encouraged applicants to develop «common core state
standards,» design a
teacher evaluation plan based in part
on the performance of their students, ensure «successful conditions for high - performing charter schools,» and numerous other reforms (see «Results of President Obama's Race to the Top,» research, Fall 2015).
It explains reformers» enthusiasm for test - based accountability; for «college and career - ready
standards»; for
teacher evaluations based, in significant part,
on student outcomes; for «data - based instruction»; and for much of the rest of the modern - day reform agenda.
The new incentive, called the Race to the Top Fund, aims «to reverse the pervasive dumbing - down of academic
standards and assessments by states,» the secretary said, and to punish states «that explicitly prohibit linking data
on achievement or student growth to principal and
teacher evaluations.»
Schools should focus
teacher evaluation and feedback efforts
on the specific instructional changes required for the gap
standards.
And student growth would have been introduced thoughtfully into
teacher evaluation systems based
on new measures aligned to the new
standards.
Montgomery County's school district and union are focusing
on standards - based professional development and the
evaluation of
teachers by principals, with the goal of improving student achievement.
And there's plenty of substance for the president to brag about: Forty - six states and the District of Columbia signed
on to rigorous common
standards; dozens of states got serious about
teacher evaluations; key jurisdictions removed caps
on charter - school expansion.
They are now focused
on implementing the Common Core state
standards with aligned national tests upon which
teacher evaluation will increasingly rest.
Many point to the decision to «put the pedal to the metal»
on teacher evaluation at the same time the state's school districts and
teachers were grappling with Common Core and the changes in practice the higher
standards demanded.
The seminar — promoted through a collaboration between HGSE and the Center for Public Policy and Educational
Evaluation (Centro de Políticas Públicas e Avaliação da Educação, or CAEd) of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora in Brazil — focused
on education reform, specifically U.S. efforts to develop 21st - century skills through
teacher education, leadership development, and the definition of
standards for
teachers and school leaders.
Specifically, the average
teacher's students score 0.05
standard deviations higher
on end - of - year math tests during the
evaluation year than in previous years, although this result is not consistently statistically significant across our different specifications.
It is instructive that while the Obama administration sought to nationalize its policies
on teacher evaluation,
standards, and assessments, the Bush administration attempted to do the same
on accountability.
We are focused
on making things better — via stronger
standards (Common Core), greater parental choice (vouchers, charters, and more), more effective
teachers (upgrading preparation programs, devising new
evaluation regimens) and lots else.
In Smith's model, as it was refined over time, curriculum
standards serve as the fulcrum for educational reform implemented based
on state decisions; state policy elites aim to create excellence in the classroom using an array of policy levers and knobs — all aligned back to the
standards — including testing, textbook adoption,
teacher preparation,
teacher certification and
evaluation,
teacher training, goals and timetables for school test score improvement, and state accountability based
on those goals and timetables.
And it sends back to the states and local districts major policy - making authority
on issues such as
standards and
teacher evaluation.
In New York, new
standards, new tests, and new
teacher evaluations came all at once — and it was too much, says Jennifer Monsour, a 7th grade
teacher at South Side Middle School
on Long Island.
Those
on the right increasingly believe that the Common Core represents severe federal overreach into state sovereignty over education; those
on the left, including the AFT, are pushing back not against the
standards themselves, but against their implementation and use in newly adopted high - stakes
teacher evaluation systems.