Sentences with phrase «on teaching your body»

In Phase 3, we focus on teaching your body how to properly generate the energy you need to get you through the day while doing it in a manner that protects your thyroid and promotes healthy energy production.

Not exact matches

For my day to day activities - training clients, teaching classes and running my website, I prefer to rely on my stored body fat as a form of energy.

For my day to day activities — training clients, teaching classes and running my website, I prefer to rely on my stored body fat as a form of energy.

Well, from kindergarten on we often teach science as a body of information not relevant to anything going on in the world.

West's «other way» is sourced from Pope John Paul II's teaching on the theology of the body, which he endeavours to make accessible to the Christian masses.

«But even more than Christ being the Rock — the foundation of His ecclesia (the Body of Christ and His followers), Christ would build His ecclesia on a specific principle — the principle that God would teach His followers directly.»

I don't think that its feasible to expect everyone to follow NFP, though I'm personally a huge proponent and believe women need more education on their bodies and menstrual cycles, and condoms while not «moral» persay or in line with the church's teaching are a much better option than hormonal birth control or Plan B as they are simply a barrier method not an abortificant.

I won't judge this woman on how devout she thinks she is, but I truly think that she needs to understand the teaching behind this theology and how contraceptions actually disrespects a women's body.

Moreover, it is demeaning to suggest that Paul VI affirmed the Church's classic position on marital love and procreation (which had been held for centuries by virtually every Christian community until the Anglican Communion broke ranks at the 1930 Lambeth Conference) because he was afraid that changing the traditional position would unravel the entire body of Catholic moral teaching.

The document criticizes «doctrinal or disciplinary security,» «an obsession with the law,» «punctilious concern for... doctrine,» «dogmatism,» «hiding behind rules and regulations,» and «a rigid resistance to change,» while reprimanding those who «give excessive importance to certain rules,» overemphasize «ecclesial rules,» believe that «doctrine... is a closed system,» «feel superior to others because they observe certain rules,» have «an answer for every question,» wish to «exercise a strict supervision over others» lives,» «long for a monolithic body of doctrine guarded by all and leaving no room for nuance,» believe that «we give glory to God... simply by following certain ethical norms,» and «look down on others like heartless judges, lording it over them and always trying to teach them lessons.»

Most religions were founded on revelations that have been verified by other people having the same experiences — which are recorded and then form a body of wisdom teachings.

«By teaching [students] that this «gender identity» is their «authentic self,» disassociated from the body, we are actively training children into a state of «gender dysphoria» as the normal,» Davies Arai states on her blog, Transgender Trend.

The result of that decision has been explained by St. Thomas as a collective sin of «the whole human race in Adam, as one body of one man» (De Malo 4,1), following on St Paul's teaching that in Adam all die (1 Cor.

Theologies of play and of the body could be understood as the church's teaching on these topics, although in fact they tend to call for some shift in Christian thinking as a whole based on attention to what can be learned as one takes play or the body seriously.

His teaching on human relationships - later to be known as the «theology of the body» - gave a new direction and depth to the Church's teaching on marriage and sexual communion.

In James» view, the Reformation led to a chaos of doctrines, as independent authorities began interpreting scripture for themselves, thus proving the value of Catholicism's centralised body of teaching centred on the authority of the Pope.

When considering the grandeur and dignity afforded to the whole human person (body, mind and spirit) in the sight of God and Jesus» teachings on non-violence, a «moral thorn» exists as to the defensibility of boxing and MMA.

In lecturing on Plato's dialogue Phaedo, where Socrates sets forth the view that the afterlife is a state of being where the soul passively contemplates the eternal Forms, I would draw a clear contrast between that and the New Testament teaching about the resurrection of the body.

You have Christian faith when these basic attitudes are consciously and pre-eminently drawn from, based on, or focused by the teachings and example of Jesus whom we call the Christ or the body of the faithful that we call the Church, and when there is a deep commitment to living out these basic attitudes in your life.

On the other hand, when teachers possess the authority of qualified experts in learning and in the guidance of learning, and when they are organized into strong professional bodies which faithfully exercise responsibility for high professional standards, they can freely teach with sole regard to individual aptitude and need and without fear or favor in respect to social class.

Somehow, a belief system that teaches people that they are the center of all the universe, created in the image of the most perfect being imaginable, strikes me as a bit more of an ego trip than accepting that we aren't destined to live forever because of our «specialness», but that we live our short lifetimes and die like every other living thing on the planet, our bodies decomposing and ultimately entering the food chain once again, on a tiny speck of a planet in an ordinary, remote backwater of the universe.

On the other side, we have been reminded that the orthodox eschatological teaching is the resurrection of the body, so that we should understand psyche and soma as two aspects of one human person.

He believes that Jesus taught a humble, radical lifestyle that changes hearts and minds on the ground — not in law courts or legislative bodies.

that's not the way they taught it when I was in school... the story then was we evolved from apes... you have to keep changing it cause the lie don't fit the proof... the skin on my body heals not evolves... are you sure atheists are as smart as you all say.

Mormon theology teaches that God is only one of countless gods, that he used to be a man on another planet, that he became a god by following the laws and ordinances of that god on that world, and that he brought one of his wives to this world with whom he produces spirit children who then inhabit human bodies at birth.

At a time when individualism was still, generally speaking, obscuring the fullness of traditional catholic teaching on this mystery, he wrote: «When Christ comes to one of his faithful it is not simply in order to commune with him as an individual;... when, through the mouth of the priest, he says Hoc est corpus meum, these words extend beyond the morsel of bread over which they are said: they give birth to the whole mystical body of Christ.

As we have seen, Wright advocates a view in which Christian teaching focuses not on life after death but «life after life after death,» which includes the resurrection of the body and the redemption of the created order.

The group - which created a missionary bishop to cater for disaffected Anglicans in Scotland, England and across Europe who are unhappy with the church's teaching on issues such as sexuality - made comments following Most Rev Justin Welby's criticism of the body at the recent Primates» Meeting on Friday.

Although one can not be altogether sure of any particular saying of Jesus, the body of teaching which as a whole can be relied on as authentic is by no means inconsiderable.

In a plant like ours, we are small and simply don't have enough mass yet to do very many things, and so I have been doing some teaching on the universal body of believers, which is call «Big C Church,» and how we can be involved in other churches in town to get what we ourselves can not offer.

On numerous occassions Paul uses the imagery of a body to teach us what the Church should look like, such as in Ephesians 1:22 - 23: «And God placed all things under His feet and appointed Him to be head over everything for the church, which is His body, the fullness of Him who fills everything in every way.»

They thought the truth of the Church's teaching about conjugal morality and fertility regulation could be presented in a humane and personalistic way: one that acknowledged both the moral duty to plan one's family and the demands of self - sacrifice in conjugal life; one that affirmed methods of fertility - regulation that respected the body's dignity and its built - in moral «grammar;» one that that recognized the moral equality and equal moral responsibility of men and women, rather than leaving the entire burden of fertility - regulation on the wife.

The teaching authority of the Church does not define on this issue but does grant that it is quite legitimate to enquire into the origins of the material body.

Generis: «For these reasons the Teaching Authority of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state of human sciences and sacred theology, research and discussions, on the part of men experienced in both fields, take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter - for the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God» [italics added].

The Bible teaches to treat your body as it is a temple... I guess this priest thinks a little graffiti on the sides of the church is O.K.... Whatever.

Have we overemphasised the Pauline teaching on each person being a part of the Body of Christ, and the diversity of the spiritual gifts, so that UK Christians now simply pick their gift from the list, get on with it and leave it at that?

Early in my own discipleship, I was privileged to attend a class that taught one how to explore what particular gifts one had been given and how to work within the Body by focusing on those and also understanding how members with other giftings functioned best.

Church was originally loving, supporting communities based on the Bible's teaching — I don't think they had governing bodies, and all the other stuff that goes with big organisations.

When a bishop acts in persona Christi, fulfilling his duty to teach on matters of faith and morals by identifying propositions to which he calls upon the faithful to assent, he presumably means to state truths that belong to one and the same body of truths: primarily, those entrusted by Jesus to his Church and, secondarily, those necessary to preserve the primary truths as inviolable and / or to expound them with fidelity.

Today's generation of Catholics is being infuenced by a much more nourishing diet than was available in the 1970s, and takes for granted the good things available: the Catechism of the Catholic Church, World Youth Day, St JPII's Theology of the Body, the New Movements, Veritatis Splendor, Benedict XVI's teaching on the relationship between faith and reason, and his emphasis on truth, beauty and a personal encounter with Christ, to name just a few.

The Yehudi founds his congregation on a positive and coherent body of teaching, and it is in this teaching that we can most clearly find Buber's own wisdom and belief.

Indeed, Aristotle's formulation was taken up by the Catholic Church («the unity of soul and body is so profound that one has to consider the soul to be the «form» of the body» proclaims the Catechism at § 365) as part of its official teaching on the relation between the soul and the body.

At all events, nothing can gainsay this reality, on which both the Bible and anthropology agree: that there is something definitive about the commitment of one body to another in sexual congress, and from that anthropological fact the Church's teachings on sexuality must be understood.

To these remarkable examples of magisterial teaching I can not provide here a full - blown commentary but only, as it were, a mere footnote: All I want to do on this site is to provide a brief reflection on how St. Paul uses the word body in his letters.

But a body of newer work on the apostle — including, perhaps, as Hurtado notes, Wright's own new books (which I haven't had the chance to finish reading yet)-- reveals that Paul may, after all, look less like a liberal Westerner than the New Perspective has taught us to think and more like a Christ - haunted figure whose radical social practices arose directly from his pioneering, innovative thinking about the identity and achievement of Jesus Christ.

Indeed, Aristotle's formulation was taken up by the Catholic Church «the unity of soul and body is so profound that one has to consider the soul to be the «form» of the body» proclaims the Catechism at 365) as part of its official teaching on the relation between the soul and the body.

We teach the rising generation not to be at home in their own bodies, as the strange fixation on transgender rights illustrates.

Catholic teaching on the marital embrace simply embrace Natural Law, the law of nature written into our bodies.

Here's a quick primer on the teaching called «Theology of the Body» (which I recommend you read, it's INCREDIBLE!)

Gnostic teaching, with its emphasis on spirit and its condemnation of matter, came preaching either that it did not matter what a man does with his body, or that it was nothing less than a duty to give the fleshly nature its full sway.