Sentences with phrase «on temperature of»

In my mind, Autumn is not reliant on the temperature of the air outside.

It's going to depend on the temperature of the San Francisco housing market but we generally recommend that you hire a real estate agent as soon as you're thinking of selling your home.

It's going to depend on the temperature of the Sarasota housing market but we generally recommend that you hire a real estate agent as soon as you're thinking of selling your home.

It's going to depend on the temperature of the Austin housing market but we generally recommend that you hire a real estate agent as soon as you're thinking of selling your home.

It's going to depend on the temperature of the Portland housing market but we generally recommend that you hire a real estate agent as soon as you're thinking of selling your home.

Depending on the temperature of the coffee, they may also have bodily injury that ranges from minor to serious.

This would lead to great gains for convenience stores, simplicity for consumers, constitutional fairness, and simply the abolishment of an outdated, silly law (Oklahoma is the only other US state which puts any sort of regulation on the temperature of beer).

The doneness of the egg, depends on the temperature of the white and the yolk.

How long was the influence on temperature of Pinatubo in 1991?

We are asked to believe that a perfectly good solid or liquid surface is emitting BB like contiunous spectra, based only on the Temperature of the material; but the instant that material evaporates or sublimes, and becomes a vapor at the same tem [ertaure, the radiation must cease, because it is a gas, and gases do not emit black body like thermal radiation.

It is then emitted from there based on the temperature of the atmosphere not the surface.

cohenite, Quick correction: «That was my point; what is being absorbed from backradiation is what was emitted and what was emitted is based on the temperature of the surface.»

That was my point; what is being absorbed from backradiation is what was emitted and what was emitted is based on the temperature of the surface.

EM from the sun consists of photons, which are packets of E = hv, the frequency v being dependent on the temperature of the sun.

You also seem to think that a photon of a certain wavelength changes absorption characteristics depending on the temperature of its source.

In addition data on the temperature of river follows essentially the same seasonal pattern as air temperature.

Both values depend on the temperature of the instrument.

If the value for emissivity is the same value for absorptivity, and emissivity is temperature dependent, would not the absorptivity depend on the temperature of the absorber, as you say?

But the same slab of silicon can readily radiate a continuous thermal spectrum, that depends only on the Temperature of the material, and generally follows the Planck formula, with perhaps some spectral emissivity function.

I am trying to understand how radiation of longwave energy depends on the temperature of the atmosphere.

Frying foods can be a bit tricky, as it all depends on the temperature of the oil.

If the greenhouse depends on the the temperature of the gas that radiates into space, that implies all the other events of absorbing and re-radiating longwave radiation are of no ultimate consequence for determining the temperature of the Earth.

Emission depends on temperature of the gas.

Note in Equation B that I have made explicit the dependence of emissivity on the temperature of the atmosphere at that time, and the dependence of absorptivity on the temperature of the surface.

Without the slightest evidence that reducing or ELIMINATING ACO2 will have ANY measurable effect on the temperature of the earth over any time frame examines.

Do they vary in their effect depending on the temperature of the surface?

That is why I concluded that the ozone hole must be decreasing and this will have an impact on the temperature of (the upper?)

My observed «anomaly» here is perhaps not the same everywhere in the world but I expect it to be the same or more in the tropics and in terms of sheer surface area and volume the tropics and subtropics must be considered having the biggest impact on the temperature of the planet.

Water vapor is brought into the atmosphere via evaporation - the rate depends on the temperature of the ocean and air.

This is not so with climate science where the climate models have overestimated the effect of increasing CO2 on the temperature of the earth's atmosphere by a factor of two over the past 25 years.

8 21.1 Factors That Affect Climate Water Bodies • Large bodies of water such as lakes and oceans have an important effect on the temperature of an area because the temperature of the water body influences the temperature of the air above it.

For example, if changes in temperature relate linearly to changes in green house gas concentrations in the upper atmosphere, that yields a diminishing marginal impact on temperature of increased concentrations due to the logarithmic forcing of GHGs.

(This is of common knowledge, of course, but I wrote this for the case if someone is not clear with the mathematics behind the impact of CO2 on the temperature of air).

I also said «All bodies with heat lose heat by infrared radiation at their surfaces depending on the temperature of the surface.

Its value depends only on the temperature of the air.

2) Black body radiation depends on temperature of object observed.

In other words the average altitude of the molecules depends on the temperature of an isothermal atmosphere.

In any case, CO2 may be just tagging along for the ride with respect to having a significant affect on the temperature of the earth.

Although the rate of infrared absorption doesn't depend on the temperature of the infrared - active gases, the rate of emission does.

A model of global surface temperature change (a: red line) produced using the sum of the impacts on temperature of natural (b, c, d) and anthropogenic factors (e).

This apparent link has led some researchers to propose that the intensity of a tropical cyclone depends on the temperature of the oceans over which it forms.

In a more realistic setting, the particle would exchange energy with the walls, and the particle would have a boltzmann distribution based on the temperature of the walls of the container.

Tim Folkerts says «In a more realistic setting, the particle would exchange energy with the walls, and the particle would have a boltzmann distribution based on the temperature of the walls of the container.»

It would also depend on the temperature of the ground water and the comparable air temperature.

More seriously, do you really believe that 7 billion humans can have no influence whatsoever on the temperature of the planet?

With ideal diatomic gases they are, and worse, the dependency itself depends on the temperature of the gas and the energy required to excite rotations vs vibrations.

If we take N2 and fill the volume, the N2 will reach an equilibrium temperature based on the temperature of the box and whatever radiation is absorbed.

This is because the incident radiation will be at one wavelength (or range of wavelengths), but the wavelength of emission depends on the temperature of the surface.

In my thread here, there's a great citation to a page in Norwegian discussing the effect of wind on the temperature of Svalbard.

To Jim D When you measure OLR from satellites you actually sample the OLR intensity over many thousands of samples over the entire Eartyh and then average the values because the individual values are entirley dependent on the temperature of that area of the surface that the OLR is radiated from.