The overall outcome is a summary of the current state of knowledge concerning the impacts
on terrestrial vegetation of future policy decisions that aim to influence anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions.
Not exact matches
«Our finding that
vegetation plays a key role future in
terrestrial hydrologic response and water stress is of utmost importance to properly predict future dryness and water resources,» says Gentine, whose research focuses
on the relationship between hydrology and atmospheric science, land / atmosphere interaction, and its impact
on climate change.
Current research focusing
on terrestrial animals includes several studies
on the island fox, one
on the role of deer mice in affecting
vegetation community recovery, and one
on the response of lizards to the removal of rats
on Anacapa.
These works derived from or mimicking biological forms, installed
on the floor or in the surrounding
vegetation rather than solely
on clean white walls, call for temporal,
terrestrial, and metaphysical frames of reference.
By process of elimination, there is net flow of CO2 into
vegetation / land (with emissions from them being overall negative aside from fuel combustion), which is unsurprising in contexts ranging from a multitude of studies
on co2science.org to how satellite - measured global net
terrestrial primary production increased by several percent per decade during the period of global warming (Nemani et al. 2003, for instance).
The ability of
terrestrial vegetation to both take up and release carbon and water makes understanding climate change effects
on plant function critical.
They include the physical, chemical and biological processes that control the oceanic storage of carbon, and are calibrated against geochemical and isotopic constraints
on how ocean carbon storage has changed over the decades and carbon storage in
terrestrial vegetation and soils, and how it responds to increasing CO2, temperature, rainfall and other factors.
Here seven GVMs are used to investigate possible responses of global natural
terrestrial vegetation to a major new set of future climate and atmospheric CO2 projections generated as part of the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5)(6), the primary climate modeling contribution to the latest Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change assessment.
Estimating the carbon stocks in
terrestrial ecosystems and accounting for changes in these stocks requires adequate information
on land cover, carbon density in
vegetation and soils, and the fate of carbon (burning, removals, decomposition).
In recent years, many have expressed concerns that global
terrestrial NPP should be falling due to the many real (and imagined) assaults
on Earth's
vegetation that have occurred over the past several decades — including wildfires, disease, pest outbreaks, and deforestation, as well as overly - hyped changes in temperature and precipitation.
The long - term potential predictability of soil water variations in combination with the slow regrowth of
vegetation after major disruptions leads to enhanced predictability
on decadal timescales for
vegetation,
terrestrial carbon stock, and fire frequency, in particular in the Southern United States (US) / Mexico region.
In the version of this Letter originally published, in the final paragraph, the section of text including «Earth system models should... nutrient cycling)» was misleading and should have been: «Models simulating the dynamics of the
terrestrial biosphere currently consider the effects of nitrogen
on vegetation and soils25, 26 but they still do not consider the effects of other nutrients such as phosphorus or potassium.
Studies also suggest there could be impacts
on the carbon cycle (Zickfeld et al, 2008) and
on soil moisture and primary productivity of the
terrestrial vegetation (Vellinga and Wood, 2002).»