Sentences with phrase «on the atheist side»

And even on the atheist side, what about Nietzsche, Feuerbach, Camus, Satre?

You sure you want to be on the atheist side, dude?

Thank goodness there are some intelligent ppl on the atheist side of the argument that do not let their egos and emotions control them like her.

On the atheist side, undeniable scientific proof of the big bang theory and evolution do not disprove the existence of God.

See, No - Such... folks on the Atheist side have been pointing out acts in history and have been declaring that Christianity and other Faiths should be judged on the acts of the Faithful in the past.

Not exact matches

On the one hand you are right and some atheists definitely try to argue there side to much.

Majority of Atheists don't understand the purpose of religion, while on the other side most religious people don't understand their religion.

On the flip - side, as an atheist I have come to accept that the time I have on this planet is limited and preciouOn the flip - side, as an atheist I have come to accept that the time I have on this planet is limited and preciouon this planet is limited and precious.

I think the percentage of atheists versus believers is higher than the number you provide, and I also think the important point (perhaps implied by tallulah) is that per person, there is more anger on the side of the theists than the nonbelievers.

This lady hasn't done any real homework — 1 Christian ever 4 minutes was killed in 2009 I believe, on the other side of the planet - Hindu's kill Christians in India, the Chinese church is underground because of it's ban on Christianity, Russia killed thousands in it's atheist conquest, Indochina the Muslims decapitate Christians... Do your own homework, find out, and look for sources that don't share your bias

Have wars been started by an atheist probably., has a war been started by a person who believes they have god on their side..

On the flip side, I know many atheists.

If I have to choose a side between atheist and non-atheist based on your definition, I choose neither.

there are exceptions on each side, but generally, atheists know more about the bible than the chrisitans who say they follow it.

So, I don't think History and Statistics are on the side of atheists.

But I (an atheist) and most Christians I know would agree that if someone thinks that God is on the side of their particular sports team, that they probably aren't the deepest thinker.

GW can be a christian yes but there are some people who are catholics and christians and jehovas and atheist and so on that don't understand their wrong doing, saying God is on my side to go ahead and kill millions of innocent woman and children based on lies while the truth is for oil, that's not a real christian in my book, There's plenty of serial killers out there that says they've heard God telling them to kill.

I've been on both sides of this so called debate and the atheist side makes perfect sense in this natural world.

On the other side is a Christian press all to eager to paint over the legacy of an avowed atheist in order to wrap the story up with a picture - perfect Christian subculture bow.

For instance, most atheists don't come on here to call believers idiots (well not most and not at first anyways), it's to get into some healthy debate and expand our knowledge as well as hear a differing side.

I didn't want «Mechanist Atheists» put on the «extremes of thought» side, which is kind of what I heard.

In His way, not the way of the internet atheists who imagine science is on their side and proves everything they need to know.

I do not think its fair to jump on one person of faith for his post and then be silent for the post from the Atheist side.

Although I have noticed extremism by some Christians online, it is more prevalent on the Atheists» side.

Many atheists do desire God (without knowing Him) and will sincerely choose Him on the other side of the grave.

if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.

I'm not sure I understand a) why atheism is mentioned in response to an article on abortion (since atheists also take both sides on this issue), and b) why there is so much fear and stereotyping about atheism in general.

And on the flip side, you would think that those who claim no allegience to any higher power might consistantly be rude, crass and violent and yet there are many respectful and well spoken atheists.

You say that we atheists have the facts and better arguments on our side, but that God will prove us wrong.

With respect, might I suggest that by trying to peg David's current process on either side of the Christian / agnostic - atheist divide one could be missing the point.

This bottom of the barrel, level of debate, as an exchange of the billboards between religious and atheist only serves to highlight a profound ignorance on both side of the argument.

Why can't we all just mind our own business when it comes to peoples bedrooms and wedding albums, neither side get's to preach in schools, though I understand how you would think of it as the atheist getting his way by just not having you preach your God to his children in a publicly funded school, but he's not sending an atheist spokesman to influence your children, he just doesn't feel it's right to allow the religious spokesman into the schools to influence any children on his tax dollar.

And just where are all the christians that come on here whining about how CNN has this complete atheist agenda on every article and never posts anything «on their side» of the issue?

This is a technicality that Atheists use to try to put the burden on the other side.

Enough with the sensationalist journalism pretending there's some giant Christian vs atheist fight, when reality is the majority of sane people on both sides really couldn't care less what the other side does.

There's just as much vitriol on the believers» side as you claim there is on the atheists» side.

But there are bad people on both sides - Christian, and Atheist.

Atheists like to imagine that they have science on their side.

That goes for people on both side of the divide, atheists and the religious.

You all have mocked Christians and some have swore at people on here with Christian beliefs so what am I to think that atheists are compassionate, logic isn't on your side on this one.

The Fundamentalist Christians are on one side of the coin; the Fundamentalist Atheists are the opposite side of the same coin.

On the religion - bashing side, there's David Silverman, president of the group American Atheists, which raised one of its provocative trademark billboards in New York's Times Square last week.

It seems to be forgotten that neo-Darwinism is being championed by a dwindling number of atheists on both sides of the Atlantic, though they still control most of TV and the scientific media.

On the flip side, there are the non-religious people who don't take the time to investigate religion, but just go with whatever Christopher Hitchens says or some other well - known atheist.

The republitards are a circus act... they'll never make the USA a christard nation, the good Atheists and other religions won't allow it and for it to be a christard nation they will need the vote to be on their side... not ever going to happen.

Atheists do not have a religion, they have common sense and intelligence on their side of the equation.

Sorry foolish atheists but History IS NOT on your side.

12ax7, Your putting your own desires or what you might call «your dark side» on Atheists with the «H O M O» thing.

Since they are not side tracked by religious mandates, atheists are free to improve the quality of life of everyone, and they treasure each moment they have on this planet.

That is why we see so much hate on the sides of the atheists and gays because they can not conform to Gods plans and know it.