It's for those who are interested in a totally different take
on the baptism of the Spirit and spiritual gifts than the Pentecostal view and the cessationist view.
In May of 1944, Bonhoeffer wrote some thoughts
on the baptism of Dietrich Wilhelm Rudiger Bethge, his godson.25 Although participating in a rite that was outdated as far as modernity would have it, Bonhoeffer speaks of the future church that will have changed greatly.
Not exact matches
That said, the Republicans» collective
baptism on earmarks stands as a particularly stunning and brazen example
of Washington hypocrisy — and that's saying something.
Since this «earthly» ordinace has not always been available
on the earth, God has provided this solution to provide «proxy
baptisms» for those who have died without the knowledge
of Christ's Gospel.
XAV — «Christ himself was baptized to show us that we all need
baptism, even he needed
baptism not because he was sinful or needed sins removed but to give us an example
of what we need to do
on this earth, and not only did he get baptized but he did it at the hands
of john the baptist who held the authority to baptize at that time.»
Baptism is a prerequisit to salvation, as per the LDS belief, the work is done
on behalf
of those departed without knowing whether they will or will not accept
on the other side.
The
baptism of Jesus by John is very different depending
on which gospel you read.
The Church
of Jesus Christ
of Latter - day Saints does not recognize any other
baptism as legitimate unless it is through their church, which they believed is the only «True» church
on the planet.
When you read the context and see that Paul was speaking
on the subject
of those who don't believe in the resurrection, but believed in
baptism as Christians, you realize that he was saying that what is the point
of baptism if you are only going to end up dead.
Jesus Christ taught that
baptism is essential to the salvation
of all who have lived
on earth (see John 3:5).
Simply stated, Mormons and anyone else who put over emphasis
on the act
of baptism, do nt understand that the act
of baptism DOES NOT SAVE YOU!!
In our churches and temples we practice all
of the same ordinances that Jesus Christ practiced
on the earth including
baptism, sacrament, and others.
The article is saying the the Mormon church is enforcing its policy
of not performing vicarious
baptisms of holocaust victims and is apologizing and taking corrective action based
on a single runaway member doing something that was clearly against the rules.
There are rites based
on eternity
of the human soul like special
baptisms but this is foreign to x «tianity.
Those who willfully remain ignorant
of the Church's teachings
on faith and morals will not be excused simply because
of their
baptism.
«Whatever you do for the least
of these...» Jesus» whole ministry between
baptism and the cross (something I've mentioned before that you seem to ignore) is mostly about caring for people and is focused
on compassion.
New Testament Fulfillment: «After his
baptism, as Jesus came up out
of the water, the heavens were opened and he saw the Spirit
of God descending like a dove and settling
on him.
Similarly, one might be concerned that Luther's comparative lack
of interest in the sacraments, innocent enough in his early lectures
on the Psalms, is growing somewhat ominous when he finds it possible to expound Romans without mentioning
baptism.
tickled I confirm that what poquimoqui said,
Baptisms are performed individually
on behalf
of the deceased, however the individual acting as proxy will end up doing so again for each individual.
If Mormons were so upright
on their faith they'd (1) acknowledge Christ is the last prophet (negating the book
of LDS), and (2) these proxy
baptisms of the dead violate the Word.
While this is a vile act — An act that spits
on the beliefs
of Anne Frank and the entire Jewish religion — one must ask, is this really worst than the thousands upon thousands
of other
Baptisms for the dead that the mormons perform?
However, the insult is in the explicit denial
of the authenticity
of Christian
baptisms,
on the basis
of the Mormon belief that the power was lost upon the death
of the original apostles, and was restored when they returned as angels and appeared to Joseph Smith, granting him authority which now resides only within the Mormon organization.
My favorite part
of this article is when they are
on the subject
of the church's
baptism.
(II, 105) Having established the historicity
of the
baptism event, Meier is adamant that the narrative must be seen as a Christian midrash, drawing
on various OT themes to assert the primacy
of Jesus over John.
We saw a new (female) Bishop
of London appointed, a royal engagement (and
baptism beforehand), thousands calling for a ban
on Franklin Graham visiting the UK, while a Christian baker appeared at the US supreme court to ask for the right to refuse to make a gay wedding cake.
We will be looking at these passages: Matthew 28:19 - 20, Mark 16:16; several Scriptures
on baptism from the Book
of Acts, Romans 6, Colossians 2:12, and 1 Peter 3:21.
Indeed, when Benedict reflected
on Holy Saturday as the day
of his
baptism, he made a similar statement: that «through God's silence, still we hear him speak, and through the darkness
of his absence, we glimpse his light.»
The historicity
of the
baptism is addressed
on pages 100 - 105, before considering the meaning
of Jesus»
baptism on pages 106 - 116.
Also, Levi is instructed
on the various methods and modes
of baptism, and shown why all the other methods are nothing more than getting wet.
Mitt spent 2 years in France preaching the Gospel
of Jesus Christ, Faith, Repentance,
Baptism and laying
on of hands for the Gift
of the Holy Ghost.
But first, he has to attend a four - week class
on the meaning
of baptism, after which, Levi will get baptized.
So in looking at the Scripture passages
on baptism, we will first try to determine in context what kind
of immersion or re-identification is in view.
This parable follows
on the heels
of Jesus» triumphant entry into Jerusalem, and the moments when he cast the moneychangers from the temple, cursed the fig tree and asked the religious officials if they had accepted John and the
baptism he brought.
He also expressed a personal opinion that it could be dropped if necessary and he went
on to show how this would in no way compromise the necessity
of baptism for salvation.
I think the
baptism of the Holy Spirit was the outpouring
of the spirit
on Pentecost.
In his first celebration
of the
Baptism of the Lord, Pope Benedict XVI preached
on the culture
of life...
Soon he came to doubt the validity
of infant
baptism on the ground that it was unscriptural, and that a child could not consciously accept in faith the baptismal covenant.
Similarly, the ending
of Matthew is powerful even without its emphasis
on the triune formula in which
baptism is to be administered.
I grieve for a lost opportunity whenever I attend a
baptism in which the preacher fails to preach
on the meaning
of the event.
While we may not drown people because
of their views
on baptism, it is not uncommon for one group
of Christians to condemn another group
of Christians to everlasting hell because the other group has a different view
on baptism.
When was the last time anyone gave a plenary address at a big Evangelical conference
on the importance
of infant
baptism for the well - being
of the church?
Thinking this through with considerable sympathy for the LDS leadership, it occurred to me that we Catholics might reflect more seriously
on what is really required
of us with respect to
baptism, especially
of infants.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer, writing from prison shortly before his death, addressed his godson, Dietrich Bethge,
on the occasion
of the infant's
baptism, which he could not witness: «Music, as your parents understand and practice it, will help to dissolve your perplexities and purify your character and sensibility, and in times
of care and sorrow will keep a ground - base
of joy alive in you.
Baptism was the normal, if not the indispensable, condition
of membership in the church, (I Corinthians 12:13; Galatians 3:27; Acts 2:37 - 38; etc.) and so magical an efficacy did some ascribe to it that, at least in Corinth, there were
baptisms on behalf
of the dead.
The Church
of Jesus Christ
of Latter - day Saints are carrying
on a requirement that has always existed that every man, woman child can accept or reject
baptism without prejudice.
Paul even thanked God that he himself had baptized none
of the Corinthians save two, together with the household
of Stephanas, saying, «Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach»; (I Corinthians 1:13 - 17) in the Fourth Gospel John's
baptism in water is explicitly subordinated to Christ's
baptism in the Holy Spirit; (John 1:33) and in the Epistle to the Hebrews «the teaching
of baptisms» is put among the rudimentary principles, to be accepted, indeed, but beyond which those need to go who are pressing
on «unto perfection.»
Mormons are now running their own form
of propaganda
on all forums when it comes to any critic
of their religion.You can see it
on this story already.Say Jorge and Canadianlady and many others.Baptisim is for the living not the dead and the reasons for Mormon baptisim is suspect at the very foundation
of their
baptism policy.
On the other hand, Mormons complain about Christians saying Mormons are not Christian, and many
of the same people who wring their hands over proxy
baptism call for Christians to accept Mormons as their own.
My takes
on the flood is a type and shadow
of water
baptism.
For example, he takes one
on a tour
of the baptistery in the early - third century house church
of Dura Europos (Ferguson,
Baptism 440 - 443).