The ANCOVA models indicated that there were no statistically significant differences
on the competence scales and internalizing problems between the IG and CG.
However, there was no significant difference between the groups
on the competence scale.
With the exception of two items (Item 10, Looks for you (or other parent) when upset, loading
on the Competence scale, and item 14, Does not react when hurt, loading on the Problem scale), all items were positively correlated to their dimension of origin, whereas correlations to the opposite dimension were low to null.
Not exact matches
If possible, hire people who have
scaled a business before and rely
on their expertise, but remember that a strong culture fit and
competence is most important.
Compared to the «basic group,» the «augmented group» who received the stimulant drug and parent training plus risperidone showed significant improvement (
on average with moderately better behavior)
on the Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form (NCBRF) Disruptive - Total
Scale, the NCBRF Social
Competence subscale and the Reactive Aggression part of the Antisocial Behavior
Scale.
More than ever these days, teachers need to buttress students» scores
on large -
scale accountability tests with evidence of their own classroom
competence.
(1997) E652: Current Research in Post-School Transition Planning (2003) E586: Curriculum Access and Universal Design for Learning (1999) E626: Developing Social
Competence for All Students (2002) E650: Diagnosing Communication Disorders in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students (2003) E608: Five Homework Strategies for Teaching Students with Disabilities (2001) E654: Five Strategies to Limit the Burdens of Paperwork (2003) E571: Functional Behavior Assessment and Behavior Intervention Plans (1998) E628: Helping Students with Disabilities Participate in Standards - Based Mathematics Curriculum (2002) E625: Helping Students with Disabilities Succeed in State and District Writing Assessments (2002) E597: Improving Post-School Outcomes for Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders (2000) E564: Including Students with Disabilities in Large -
Scale Testing: Emerging Practices (1998) E568: Integrating Assistive Technology Into the Standard Curriculum (1998) E577: Learning Strategies (1999) E587: Paraeducators: Factors That Influence Their Performance, Development, and Supervision (1999) E735: Planning Accessible Conferences and Meetings (1994) E593: Planning Student - Directed Transitions to Adult Life (2000) E580: Positive Behavior Support and Functional Assessment (1999) E633: Promoting the Self - Determination of Students with Severe Disabilities (2002) E609: Public Charter Schools and Students with Disabilities (2001) E616: Research
on Full - Service Schools and Students with Disabilities (2001) E563: School - Wide Behavioral Management Systems (1998) E632: Self - Determination and the Education of Students with Disabilities (2002) E585: Special Education in Alternative Education Programs (1999) E599: Strategic Processing of Text: Improving Reading Comprehension for Students with Learning Disabilities (2000) E638: Strategy Instruction (2002) E579: Student Groupings for Reading Instruction (1999) E621: Students with Disabilities in Correctional Facilities (2001) E627: Substance Abuse Prevention and Intervention for Students with Disabilities: A Call to Educators (2002) E642: Supporting Paraeducators: A Summary of Current Practices (2003) E647: Teaching Decision Making to Students with Learning Disabilities by Promoting Self - Determination (2003) E590: Teaching Expressive Writing To Students with Learning Disabilities (1999) E605: The Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP)(2000) E592: The Link Between Functional Behavioral Assessments (FBAs) and Behavioral Intervention Plans (BIPs)(2000) E641: Universally Designed Instruction (2003) E639: Using Scaffolded Instruction to Optimize Learning (2002) E572: Violence and Aggression in Children and Youth (1998) E635: What Does a Principal Need to Know About Inclusion?
For example,
on a
scale of 1 = Excellent and 5 = Very Poor, jurors gave defense attorneys,
on average, a
competence score of 1.68 when they returned a verdict that was completely in favor of the defendant, 1.95 when they returned a split verdict, and 2.23 when they returned a verdict that was all in favor of the state / plaintiff.
It is divided into subscales measuring a need for autonomy (7 items),
competence (6 items) and relatedness (8 items) with each item measured
on a seven - point
scale from 1 (not at all) to 7 (very true).
On the other hand, there was less psychometric data available for the six «self - related»
scales than for the psychopathology
scales, although internal consistencies for these
scales were uniformly high (with the exception of some subscales for the Pictorial
Scale of Perceived
Competence and Social Acceptance for Young Children; PSPCSAYC).
Children rated themselves
on a four - point
scale in five domains, as well as
on global self - worth (higher scores indicate greater
competence).
Data
on academic
competence, behavioral self - regulation, and social
competence was measured through several
scales.
Social
competence was measured by the total problems
scale on the CBCL and TRF.
General Cognitive - Behavioral Therapy (CBT) facilitator
competence are rated using 12 items rated
on 10 - point
scales that assess various general indices of a competent group therapist (e.g., leader expresses ideas clearly and at an appropriate pace, leader keeps group members
on task during session).
Controlling for the unique content of the other four EBTs, the amount of AF - CBT Abuse - specific content delivered was significantly related to improvements
on standardized parent rating
scales (i.e., child externalizing behavior, anger, anxiety, social
competence) and both parent and clinician ratings of the child's adjustment at discharge (i.e., child more safe, less scared / sad, more appropriate and respectful of privacy with peers).
Children in the treatment group showed significant improvement over waitlisted children in emotion regulation and social
competence, according to both mother and father reports on the Social Compete
competence, according to both mother and father reports
on the Social
CompetenceCompetence Scale.
Scores
on the BITSEA Problem
scale were positively correlated to all CBCL and PSI - SF subscales, whereas negative correlations were found between BITSEA
Competence scale and CBCL and PSI - SF subscales.
Inversely, correlations between scores
on the BITSEA
Competence scale and CBCL subscales were all very small, close to nil, and mostly negative.
It is scored
on social
competence and behaviour problem
scales.14 The
scales were originally constructed from analyses of parent ratings of 2300 clinically referred children and normed
on 1300 non-referred children.
The
competence scale was based on items of the Mindfulness - Based Interventions Teaching Assessment Criteria (MBI - TAC; Crane et al. 2013), and the Mindfulness - Based Cognitive Therapy Adherence Scale (MBCT - AS; Segal et al. 2002), but simplified to fit the clinical practice of teaching mindfulness to children with ASD and their par
scale was based
on items of the Mindfulness - Based Interventions Teaching Assessment Criteria (MBI - TAC; Crane et al. 2013), and the Mindfulness - Based Cognitive Therapy Adherence
Scale (MBCT - AS; Segal et al. 2002), but simplified to fit the clinical practice of teaching mindfulness to children with ASD and their par
Scale (MBCT - AS; Segal et al. 2002), but simplified to fit the clinical practice of teaching mindfulness to children with ASD and their parents.
To fill out the SPPA, subjects have to rate the items
on a 4 - point
scale with higher scores reflecting greater
competence.
Assessments were completed during the kindergarten year, and developmental health was measured using the Early Development Instrument (EDI), a kindergarten teacher - completed checklist for each child based
on five
scaled measures of development: physical well - being, social
competence, emotional maturity, language and cognitive development, and communication and general knowledge (Janus and Offord 2000).
Shyness
on the other hand is said to be related to poorer social
competence, lower self - esteem, anxiety and peer rejection, which may be more reflective of the children who score in the abnormal range
on the pro-social
scale and also
on the unpopularity
scale.
A variety of
scales aim to measure «emotional
competence / intelligence», an approach that is focused
on emotional abilities, e.g., the appraisal and regulation of emotions; these
scales are designed to assess performance similar to IQ tests [61], [62].