Accordingly the book opens with a part on EU Constitutional Law, which ends however with a short chapter
on judicial review of the constitutionality of EU legislation, that almost naturally launches the series of articles on the EU Judicial Architecture in Part II, which in turn leads to Part III on Judicial Protection of Individuals.
This is a decision
on a judicial review of the Government's decision to introduce the Draft Order (it was lodged earlier in the year).
Working with specialist lawyers across our firm in sectors such as energy and environment, we provide high quality, pragmatic advice
on the judicial review of planning decisions.
We advise
on judicial review of planning decisions in the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.
Our specialist team of lawyers advises
on judicial review of planning decisions, as well as statutory challenges for claimants and defendants in the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.
In this article, the author focuses
on the judicial review of «international» arbitral awards.
This high standard of review — higher than reasonableness — was recently confirmed by the B.C. Supreme Court in RM v. the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia, 2011 BCSC 832, the first decision
on a judicial review of an HPRB decision.
I focus in this essay
on judicial review of administrative action, looking at the subject «from the inside, trying to make sense of lawyers» reasons and arguments as they are actually presented and defended».
In the end, the court was ruling
on a judicial review of an administrative decision, and did not see it as «appropriate in such a case to issue declarations that [religious] rights have been breached,» says Tucker.
Advising a hydropower developer
on the judicial review of the Environment Agency's refusal to grant an impoundment licence for a hydropower project.
Advising Great Yarmouth Port Company
on the judicial review of the Marine Management Organisation's amendments to a Marine Licence.
Advising Aer Lingus
on the judicial review of a decision by the Civil Aviation Authority concerning discriminatory pricing by Heathrow Airport in respect of passenger charges (the decision was withdrawn shortly prior to proceedings being heard).
R (Davey) v Oxfordshire CC [2017] EWHC 354, [2017] EWCA Civ 1308, (2017) 20 CCLR 303 Leading case
on judicial review of Care Act decisions and changes to social care budgets / direct payments
I ended up writing a number of articles
on judicial review of the IPC and why I thought it had become a problem.
Following the introductory section to the U.S. Code's chapter
on judicial review of administrative agency decisions (5 U.S.C. Section 701), the amici state that judicial review ought to be presumptively available absent (1) a statute precluding judicial review, or (2) the FDIC's action being committed to its discretion by law.
On 4 December the Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a news release that its judicial committee had approved a judicial interpretation
on judicial review of arbitration in principle, entitled Provisions on Some Issues Related to the Trial of the Judicial Review of Arbitration (Judicial Review of Arbitration Interpretation)(最高人民法院关于审理仲裁司法审查案件若干问题的规定).
The Supreme Court considered that the Crown Court can in the same way operate a closed material procedure on PII grounds on an inter partes application under the CJPA, s 59 (7) and that the High Court can conduct a closed material procedure
on judicial review of a magistrate's order for a warrant under PACE, s 8 or a magistrate's order for disclosure or a Crown Court's order under s 59 (7) of the 2001 Act.
This blog reported in late 2014 that Judge Luo Dongchuan, then head of the SPC's # 4 Civil Division, mentioned that a new judicial interpretation
on the judicial review of arbitration - related issues will go into the Court's judicial interpretation drafting plan in 2015 and that the SPC intends to reform jurisdiction in judicial review of arbitration issues, to consolidate them in specialized courts.
On judicial review of BCWCAT v Fraser Health at the Supreme Court of British Columbia, the decision was set aside and sent back to the Tribunal, on the basis that the Tribunal ignored the expert evidence that there was no evidence of workplace factors contributing to the incidence of breast cancer.
Not exact matches
Kinder Morgan said it had previously announced a «primarily permitting» strategy for the first half
of 2018, focused
on advancing the permitting process, rather than spending at full construction levels until it obtained greater clarity
on outstanding permits, approvals and
judicial reviews.
While
judicial review still occurs in many
of the Fed's regulatory determinations, in places where value judgments are
of the most consequence, the Fed's lawyer is the first and last word
on what the law allows or forbids.
JUDGING THE JUDGES Patrick McKinley Brennan's
review «The Forms Behind the Laws» (April) begs fundamental questions
of interpretation, blurs the distinction between legislating and judging, and proposes a mode
of judicial interpretation that would, in its practical application, be indistinguishable from judges who make decisions based
on personal preference.
On the evidence, we must conclude, I think, that this tendency
of courts, including the Supreme Court, is the inevitable result
of our written Constitution and the power
of judicial review.
In normal times the people may be content with representation and constitutional
judicial review, while they largely focus
on private affairs; while at times
of what Bruce Ackerman calls constitutional politics the level
of civic action may become extraordinary (Ackerman, 1991).
An appeal
on the merits is not available for Tribunal merger authorisation decisions, but the ACCC is seeking
judicial review, alleging three reviewable errors, including that the Tribunal erred in its reasoning that «it could only conclude that the proposed acquisition was likely to result in a detriment if the Tribunal concluded that there would be a substantial lessening
of competition».
Commenting
on the
judicial review on the indexation
of public sector pensions, Christine Blower, General Secretary
of the National Union
of Teachers, the largest teachers» union, said: «The NUT, along with other unions, is challenging the Government in a
judicial review at the High Court.
Read the OSA's decision: https://humanism.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/AD2410The-London-Oratory-Hammersmith-Fulham-28August13.docx Read the BHA's previous press release
on the OSA decision: https://humanism.org.uk/2013/08/29/schools-adjudicator-london-oratory-school-must-overhaul-admissions-criteria-after-bha-complaint/ Read the BHA's press release
on the threat
of judicial review: https://humanism.org.uk/2013/11/05/london-oratory-school-challenges-schools-adjudicators-decision-must-rewrite-admissions-policy/ Read more about the BHA's campaigns work
on «faith» schools: http://www.humanism.org.uk/campaigns/religion-and-schools/faith-schools View the BHA's table
of types
of school with a religious character: http://www.humanism.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/schools-with-a-religious-character.pdf The British Humanist Association is the national charity working
on behalf
of non-religious people who seek to live ethical and fulfilling lives
on the basis
of reason and humanity.
Ms Smith constantly gave way to MPs
on various aspects
of the bill, including compensation for those who are not charged after being held for 28 days, the definition
of what constitutes «grave and exceptional» circumstances and why she has avoided
judicial review of the decision.
This kind
of landmark
judicial pronouncement is understandably rare in every jurisdiction not excluding the most advanced democracies for the obvious reason that it has always been considered prudent for the preservation
of the state, democracy and the peace to ensure that proactive mechanisms are put in place before, during and after voting day to deliver credible electoral outcomes rather than rely
on costly post electoral
judicial reviews.
He has a proper understanding
of the appropriate tension between the executive and the judiciary and he's got a good record fighting against cuts to citizen's legal powers, such as
on judicial review and legal aid.
At the request
of a person directly affected by the exercise
of a power, a court may conduct a so - called
judicial review to determine whether the exercise
of a public power
on a given occasion is, or is not, within the limits
of the power.
Take the ETS case
of R (
on the application
of Bilal Mahmood) v Secretary
of State for the Home Department, where the president laid out all the awful things he could do to those who had not shown full candour in their
judicial review.
«We await the results
of the
judicial review with interest, but whatever way it goes there will probably be legal challenges either from the side
of the communities and organisations who took the
review or
on behalf
of HS2 if it doesn't go their way.
Let's remember the roll call
of shame - cuts to legal aid, curtailing
judicial review, attacks
on human rights legislation, making freedom
of information request more difficult and legislating for the loathed gagging bill amount to a substantial onslaught
on free speech, campaigning and democracy.
What we asking the Attorney General to do is to
review its position
on this matter, it may too late in a few weeks time and we will not forgive him if he goes to make a mockery
of the Ghanaian
judicial system at the African Court
of Human and People's Rights.
A
judicial review of a decision to approve two state - funded, highly selective Catholic schools will be heard at the High Court
on 15 and 16 November.
Top
of the pops this week was a piece
on the Liberal Democrat decision to support the Conservatives in dismantling
judicial review.
Lord chancellor's own arguments will be used to limit the damage
of his reforms, after final Lords debate
on judicial review
More recently, Parliament promised in the European Union Act 2011 to hold a referendum
on any law that increased the competencies
of the EU and put in place mechanics for holding itself accountable through
judicial review.
Fresh from his defeat over the prisoner book ban, it looks like Chris Grayling may be about to give way
on at least one aspect
of his
judicial review attack
Commenting
on the
judicial review on the indexation
of public sector pensions, Christine Blower, General Secretary
of the National Union
of Teachers, the largest teachers» union, said:
Lib Dems privately recognise the deeply illiberal record
of the last three years
of the coalition, but insist that they were wiser to spend political capital
on measures with potentially big public support, like free school meals, rather than matters like legal aid or
judicial review, which are completely alien to most people.
Standing
on the Bronx shoreline in Barretto Point Park, with Rikers Island directly behind him, Massey proposed criminal justice reforms including a «comprehensive
review of sentencing guidelines and
judicial practices that particularly disadvantage black and hispanic New Yorkers.»
On Tuesday, the Board
of Elections Cover Sheet
Review Committee found that the Bronx Democrats had made errors
of three volumes
of petitions involving
judicial delegates:
They did it
on judicial review, in which Grayling made up all sorts
of nonsense to justify an attack
on citizens» rights to challenge authorities in the courts.
Read the previous press release, «Full judgement published in Richmond Catholic schools
judicial review»: http://humanism.org.uk/2012/12/14/full-judgement-published-in-richmond-catholic-schools-
judicial-
review/ Read the previous press release, «Vince Cable accuses Michael Gove's officials
of breaking Coalition Agreement
on «faith» school admissions»: http://www.humanism.org.uk/news/view/1150 A survey by the Accord Coalition published
on 12 November found that 73 %
of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that «state funded schools should not be allowed to select or discriminate against prospective pupils
on religious grounds in their admissions policy», while only 18 % disagreed.
Grayling made a second compromise
on a Lords defeat, this time
on the costs
of groups helping fund the
judicial review.
On the one hand it is eager to protect its privileges as a self - governing body, free from the claws
of the judiciary, court restraint or
judicial review.
The Tory plans to repeal the HRA, together with the restricted access to our courts already brought about by the restriction
on judicial review introduced by Gove's predecessor, Chris Grayling, will silence the vulnerable and leave great swaths
of executive action unchecked and unaccountable.
Instead
of having a purely political process, the Manhattan Democratic Party uses a unique Independent
Judicial Screening Panel that
reviews candidates based
on application.