Not exact matches
The court held that the
debtor lived in a rural area with little prospect
of future employment allowing payments
on her
student loans.
(1) That the
debtor can not maintain, based
on current income and expenses, a minimal standard
of living for the
debtor and dependents if forced to pay off
student loans; (2) that additional circumstances exist indicating that this state
of affairs is likely to persist for a significant portion
of the repayment period
of the
student loans; and (3) that the
debtor has made good faith efforts to repay the loans.
As more fully set forth above,
Debtor has made a good faith effort to repay the
Student Loans, his current income and resources are such that he is unable to maintain a minimal standard
of living even without making payments
on the
Student Loans and it is unlikely that
Debtor's financial situation will improve significantly during the repayment period
of the
Student Loans.
(1) that the
debtor can not, based
on current income and expenses, maintain a «minimal» standard
of living for herself or her dependants if forced to repay the loans; (2) that this state
of affairs is likely to persist for a significant portion
of the repayment period
of the
student loans; and (3) that the
debtor has made good faith efforts to repay the loans.
The
Debtor has not been employed
on a full time basis since December 2009 and has never maintained a position that paid him a sufficient wage to enable him to repay the
Student Loans while maintaining even a minimal standard
of living.
The Brunner test requires the
debtor to make a three - part showing in order to prove undue hardship: (1) that the
debtor can not maintain, based
on current income and expenses, a «minimal standard»
of living for herself and her dependents if forced to repay the loans; (2) that additional circumstances exist indicating that this state
of affairs is likely to persist for a significant portion
of the repayment period
of the
student loans; and (3) that the
debtor has made good faith efforts to repay the loans.
Most jurisdictions, including the Ninth Circuit, use the Brunner test, which requires a
debtor to establish (1) that continued payment
of the
student loans would prevent them from maintaining even a basic standard
of living, (2) that this state
of affairs is likely to continue for the foreseeable future, and (3) that the
debtor has attempted to make payments
on the loans in good faith.