Sentences with phrase «on their computer model predictions»

In the case of climate change, those making the assumptions demand that we act immediately to avert planetary crises based solely on their computer model predictions.

«The reason why Dr MÃ ¶ rner, formerly a Stockholm professor, is so certain that these claims about sea level rise are 100 per cent wrong is that they are all based on computer model predictions, whereas his findings are based on «going into the field to observe what is actually happening in the real world».»

Not exact matches

In Chicago, the Park District will use a new high - tech system that uses computer software to give real - time predictions of bacteria counts based on such factors as water temperature, modeling of the lake bottom and wave action monitored by buoys.

Now a computer scientist who works on weather - prediction models at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Price says science and technology were always topics around his house growing up.

Although meteorologists now rely heavily on computer models (numerical weather prediction), it is still relatively common to use techniques and conceptual models that were developed before computers were powerful enough to make predictions accurately or efficiently.

It was only possible through the participation of thousands of members of the public in the work's biggest ever climate modelling exercise: they offered up spare processing capacity on their home computers to run the calculations via the Climate Prediction citizen science climate modelling programme.

Their experimental results closely matched the computer model predictions and also corresponded to the available clinical data on the action of the ventricular twist.

Lapenta foresees a day in the next decade when the increasing capabilities of new radars and satellites will be coupled with an evolving generation of finely detailed weather - prediction models running in real time on computers at speeds exceeding a quintillion computations a second.

The new findings of successful multi-year drought / fire predictions are based on a series of computer modeling experiments, using the state - of - the - art earth system model, the most detailed data on current ocean temperature and salinity conditions, and the climate responses to natural and human - linked radiative forcing.

Requist and Tosatti created a computer model of the Kondo effect under these conditions and formulated predictions on the behaviour of the molecules.

Seeing himself as a strict empiricist whose hurricane predictions are based on decades of «crunching huge piles of data,» Gray is convinced that the atmosphere is too complicated to be captured in computer simulations, at one point fulminating that «any experienced meteorologist that believes in a climate model of any type should have their head examined.»

The prediction, based on computer modeling of published studies, blames warming of the planet's oceans (ScienceNOW, 22 January, 2001).

The prediction's degree of reliability depends on the number and the quality of the samples used to train the computer learning models, the parameters that have been analysed and their relevance, given that the presence of certain bacteria varies depending on the geographical location.

«ALMA showed us that the velocities of the molecular gas in the eyelids are on the right track with the predictions we get from computer models,» said Kaufman.

The prediction of a future appearance is based on computer models of the cluster, which describe the various paths the divided light is taking through the maze of clumpy dark matter in the galactic grouping.

It's based on computer modelling, but we believe in this prediction quite strongly.

As it happens, AGW is a very highly politicised issue, deals with uncertain predictions based on computer models (rather than observations) and there is a substantial minority of experts, including some IPCC contributors who don't agree with this position.

We're not told the research is based on computer models built on completely inadequate data whose predictions are consistently incorrect.

Climate alarmism is not based on empirical observation; rather, it is entirely predicated on computer models that are manipulated to generate predictions of significant global warming as a result of increased concentrations of CO2.

Scientists rely on computerised climate models to make their predictions about climate change.Modelling experiments begin with a computer simulation of the present - day climate.

As a result, computer models can not make «predictions» they only provide «projections» which are based on the value of the assumptions made in their preparation.

Utterly wrong: the computer climate models on which predictions of rapid warming from enhanced atmospheric greenhouse gas concentration cowdungare based «run hot,» simulating two to three times the warming actually observed over relevant periods

But that raises the question: If the temperature plateau continued for another 10 years, would that be enough to cast doubt on the climate computer model predictions?

Although mainstream scientists do identify considerable uncertainties in their climate predictions, which are based on computer models, they are increasingly confident that global warming is a serious problem and often say that the uncertainties do not justify inaction.

First, the computer climate models on which predictions of rapid warming from enhanced atmospheric greenhouse gas concentration are based «run hot,» simulating two to three times the warming actually observed over relevant periods — during which non-anthropogenic causes probably accounted for some and could have accounted for all the observed warming — and therefore provide no rational basis for predicting future GAT.

No matter what political committees try to absolve corruption of climate science of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), they can not hide the complete failure of the computer models to make a single accurate prediction.

Are all of the alarmist warmistas in a world - at - risk tizzy over projections of catastrophe by computer models, or are they engaged in making predictions of impending doom, based on models and all manner of other misinterpreted evidence and made up nonsense?

Canlorbe: In the view of many, IPCC's predictions based on computer models are little better than Tarot cards and astrological predictions.

Even more frightening is that the group of scientists that can not even agree on what happened in the past believe they can tell us (with some degree of certainty) what will happen in the future based on the prediction of a non-linear chaotic computer model.

How about two sentences from a scientist mocking speculative predictions of 2100 based on speculative computer models?

My first beef with AGW was the over-reliance on computer models, which make accurate kind - casts but have no skill in prediction.

Based on Hansens» fudged 1981 CO2 hypotheses computer models were assembled and used by the IPCC for economic predictions.

He argues that the current computer models which make more alarming predictions are unreliable, and based on the assumption of large positive «water vapour feedbacks».

As long as we are unable to give a sound explanation to this recent GW episode, predictions for the future based on computer models (incredibly intelligent though these may be) will sound rather unreliable to me.

Spectral analysis, unless properly understood may lead to very misleading conclusions, here are shown four essential things one needs to be aware of all the time: On the other hand there are again unnoticeable data curiosities, this graph shows an unusual configuration within one of the top five temperature data sets used by the climate scientists in their calculations, predictions and computer models.

Predictions that global warming would wipe out polar bears are based on «scientifically unsound» computer models, according to a new study by a veteran zoologist at the University of Victoria.

This hiatus in global warming has been an embarrassment to those who base their dire climate predictions on these poorly performing computer models.

And of course, the predictions are based on computer models which can not forecast or hindcast with any accuracy.

There is an inordinate focus on ominous predictions of computer models that clearly do not work.

25 years of collecting unreliable (at best) and «noisy» temperature data from all over the face of the world, computer modeling over an even smaller span of years by people working on government grants and there you have it folks, predictions of gloom and doom for our planet with «information» extrapolated from 1850 to 2300 with all sorts of «modeled» graphs and pretty «manufactured» pictures offered as proof.

The data will also help validate the wind predictions derived from computer models, which have thus far relied on extremely limited real - world information.

Compiled by Dr Ole Humlum, Professor of Physical Geography at the University Centre in Svalbard (Norway), the new climate survey is in sharp contrast to the habitual alarmism of other reports that are mainly based on computer modelling and climate predictions.

When I am told by «believers», of these predictions made from computer models, I ask them to imagine themselves in Edwardian England on a lovely summers day in May 1914 and please outline history to the year 2000.

«Limits» is one of the other pillars of my «suspect all computer models» mantra... It was heavily promoted in the»70s based on the notion that their computer predictions had to be right, they were computerized!

In the mean time, I shall continue to visit your site as I am trying to get my mind «up to speed» on the details of «global warming» predictions — and do some bush league predictions of my own (as I enjoy «computer modeling» real systems, whether I am good at it or not).

Predictions about climate change are based on computer models that predict how phenomena such as temperature, rainfall patterns, and sea level will be affected.

MEXICO CITY, February 18, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com)- An eminent Mexican geophysicist says that despite predictions of global warming based on computer models, the world may be on the verge of an eighty - year cold period similar to the «little ice age» experienced by Europe from 1300 to 1800 A.D..

If you look at the predictions that have been made by computer models they are bang on actually.

Predictions of their extinction are based on computer software - generated climate change models, not actual scientific observation.

But these ominous predictions are based on computer models.