Proposals on the table include extending the definition of a «relevant adviser» who can sign off a compromise agreement; changing the current position on interest accruing
on tribunal awards; broader powers for tribunals to make recommendations in discrimination cases.
Not exact matches
The
tribunal in the arbitration with Danone
on claims arising out of Fonterra's WPC80 precautionary recall in August 2013 has issued its
award.
But the
tribunal awarded her # 1,100 compensation for the way the case was handled by Kirklees education authority, for «injury to her feelings», and the judgment also rebuked politicians for commenting
on the case while it was still proceeding.
Generally speaking, whether or not the original aid scheme constitutes illegal state aid (there are strong indications that it doesn't), the
tribunal should have acknowledged that the claimant investor is bound by EU state aid rules and that the satisfaction of the
award is conditioned
on the Commission's finding
on the compatibility of the original scheme with EU state aid rules.
The optimal outcome for investors is if they have the possibility to bring a claim based
on an EU FTIA before an investor ‑ state
tribunal and before domestic courts, while the optimal outcome for civil society is if investors can not bring an FTIA claim before any of the two judicial avenues; (ii) problems facing the domestic enforcement of ISDS
awards; (iii) the need to keep the investment protection standards in the agreements or not.
The term «arbitral procedure» encompasses the period beginning with the filing of an action and ending when the
award is rendered.891 The application of the law by a
tribunal,
on the other hand, goes to the actual merits of a dispute and therefore falls outside the scope of review at the recognition and enforcement stage.892
With respect to the
award of interest, the Hamburg Court of Appeal rejected a challenge to enforcement under article V (1)(c), made
on the basis that the arbitral
tribunal had
awarded more interest than had been claimed, considering that an «arbitral
tribunal can in its discretion and
on its own initiative
award interest and compound interest for the time until the rendition of the
award and for the time after the rendition of the
award.»
However,
on 5 December, the Court of Appeal led by Chief Justice Pereira JA agreed that a purposive interpretation of Part 7.3 (5)(b) should be deployed and that the provision should be read as granting permission to enforce any judgment or arbitral
award made «by a foreign court or
tribunal and amenable to be enforced at common law».
In 2009 the arbitral
tribunal found that it had jurisdiction over the dispute and in 2012 the arbitral
tribunal delivered a final
award on the merits, unanimously stating that the Russian Federation was guilty of expropriation and ordered Russia to pay compensation in accordance with the BIT.
An
award on the merits against the Russian Federation was delivered by the arbitral
tribunal in 2012, while the parallel proceeding with the Stockholm District Court dismissing the Russian Federation's plea for negative declaratory relief was not concluded until 2014.
Even without the detailed statistics, the ICC Report gives great insights
on how arbitral
tribunals award costs in international arbitration.
In a 1978 decision, for instance, the Court of Appeal of Florence refused to enforce an
award rendered in England by only two arbitrators, who had declined to appoint a third arbitrator
on the basis of the 1950 English Arbitration Act, pursuant to which a clause providing for a three - member
tribunal was deemed to take effect as if it provided for an umpire.
For instance, in a 1968 case, a Swiss court refused to issue an enforcement order
on the grounds that the arbitral
tribunal had not complied with the agreement of the parties that «all disputes should be settled in one and the same arbitral proceedings» and instead conducted the arbitration in two stages.904 In a 2001 case, the Italian Supreme Court enforced a first
award but not a second
award made with respect to the same dispute.
Introduce «naming and shaming» of businesses that do not pay employment
tribunal awards and new reporting obligations (for example, publish information
on agency workers and zero hours workers).
Courts have rejected challenges under article V (1)(d) where the parties choose institutional rules to govern their procedure that provide for flexibility concerning the manner in which the
tribunal is to be composed.881
On the other hand, a German court refused recognition and enforcement where an
award was rendered by two, instead of three arbitrators, as expressly required by the rules of the International Arbitration Court of the Belarusian Chamber of Commerce that the parties had agreed would govern their arbitration.882
We advise
on all aspects of arbitration, from drafting suitable clauses to advising
on the type and seat of arbitration, the formation of a
tribunal, arbitral procedure and enforcement of the
award.
«A party to arbitral proceedings may (upon notice to the other parties and to the arbitral
tribunal) appeal to the Court
on a question of law arising out of an
award made in the proceedings.»
After establishing the basic
award, the employment
tribunal focuses
on finalising the compensatory
award.
Summary: The
tribunal rendered a negative
award on jurisdiction.
Summary: The respondent in the arbitration challenged a separate
award on costs, in which the arbitral
tribunal had ordered the respondent to reimburse the claimant for the respondent's part of...
Symbion Power LLC v Venco Imtiaz Construction Company [2017] EWHC 348 (TCC)-- We acted successfully for the defendant, Venco, in this High Court case where the Court rejected an application to set aside an ICC arbitration
award for serious irregularity under section 68 (2)(d) of the Arbitration Act 1996
on the basis that the
tribunal had failed to deal with issues which were put to it.
The employment
tribunal found that it was not just and equitable to make an order of apportionment and so
awarded on a joint and several liability basis against the parties who did not attend the hearing.
International arbitration is a Shearman trademark, and during the time of our research it was fighting for the largest potential
award in arbitral
tribunal history, a whopping $ 50 billion from Russia
on behalf of former controlling shareholders of bankrupt oil giant Yukos.
In reaching this decision, the High Court undertook a review of past Singapore case law and legal commentary
on the nature and purpose of Article 34 (2)(a)(iii), ultimately deciding that «as a matter of policy, to hold that Art 34 (2)(a)(iii) does not apply, where no other limb under Art 34 (2) would be engaged, would allow an arbitral
tribunal to immunize its
awards against judicial scrutiny by delivering its conclusions
on both jurisdiction and merits in a single
award», which would have been an «unsatisfactory result».
Further to our previous blog
on the
tribunals issuing a response to the Vento band consultation for cases presented from 11 September 2017, the Presidents of the Employment Tribunals in England, Wales and Scotland have now issued updated joint guidance increasing the Vento bands used to calculate awards for injury to feelings (most commonly seen in discrimination and whistleblowing c
tribunals issuing a response to the Vento band consultation for cases presented from 11 September 2017, the Presidents of the Employment
Tribunals in England, Wales and Scotland have now issued updated joint guidance increasing the Vento bands used to calculate awards for injury to feelings (most commonly seen in discrimination and whistleblowing c
Tribunals in England, Wales and Scotland have now issued updated joint guidance increasing the Vento bands used to calculate
awards for injury to feelings (most commonly seen in discrimination and whistleblowing claims)...
In a decision recently published
on the Swedish Arbitration Portal, the Svea Court of Appeal dismissed a party's challenge to the arbitral
award, finding that the
tribunal had not exceeded its mandate and did not breach the principle of equal treatment of the parties.
The losing party in the arbitration sought to set aside the
award, arguing that the
tribunal had exceeded its mandate by basing its decision
on a review of related transactions governed by other agreements involving other parties.
In 2011, one of the University of Toronto's Faculty of Law professors, Judith McCormack, won the
award for her lasting impact
on her students entering the legal field and her success in achieving systemic changes in legal clinics, law schools and the
tribunal sector.
I have heard talk of a proposal to reintroduce the rather historic cap
on the compensation that can be
awarded by Employment
Tribunals for discrimination claims, in the same way that there is a limit
on the compensation for standard unfair dismissal claims.
It relied
on a number of factors, including that the
tribunal had
awarded costs against the commissioners because of their «serial failures to comply with the time limits in the
tribunal rules and its directions», which «hamper the administration of justice and can prejudice the other party».
Indeed, the majority further expressed the view (obiter) that an arbitral
tribunal could order a final (rather than interim)
award requiring compliance with the DAB's decision if that is all that the
tribunal was asked to rule
on.
This code can be referred to in
tribunal proceedings and the
tribunal has the power to
award an increase of up to 25 %
on any compensatory
award where the employer has unreasonably failed to follow the ACAS Code.
In another ground - breaking case, the Singapore High Court has set aside an investor - State arbitral
award on the basis that the
tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction...
When a review or appeal body has not already addressed a matter of discrimination by a regulator
on a prohibited ground, that discrimination may be addressed by a human rights
tribunal, exposing the regulator to a potentially significant compensation
award.
Acting and advising in a challenge to an LMAA arbitral
award under 68 of the Arbitration Act,
on the grounds that the
tribunal had failed in their duty to act fairly and impartially and failed to consider all the issues which were put to it.
In a decision recently published
on the Swedish Arbitration Portal, the Svea Court of Appeal dismissed a party's challenge to the arbitral
award, finding that the party was precluded from challenging
award on several ground, and had failed to establish that the
tribunal had been partial.
The A: Chris was instructed
on behalf of the Claimant charterers and bill of lading holders in this unseaworthiness arbitration in which the
tribunal issued an interim
award in Chris client's favour in relation to the question of incorporation of the Hague Rules into the charterparty.
In a decision recently published
on the Swedish Arbitration Portal, the Svea Court of Appeal dismissed a party's challenge to the arbitral
award, finding that the
tribunal had not exceeded its mandate.
In a decision recently posted
on the Swedish Arbitration Portal a party sought to set aside an
award alleging, among others, that by disregarding evidence the
tribunal exceeded its mandate and incurred in a procedural error
BG Group responded by saying the district and appellate courts assumed that the manifest disregard doctrine was a basis for vacating arbitration
awards, but then held that the
tribunal in this case did not manifestly disregard the law, rendering moot Argentina's bid for clarity
on the issue.
The Court of Appeal held today in the case of Small v The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospitals NHS Trust [1] that an employment
tribunal should consider of its own motion
awarding stigma damages to a successful employee in a whistleblowing dismissal case even where it is not raised
on behalf of the employee, where the evidence warranted it.
If a party, duly invited by the arbitral
tribunal to produce documents, exhibits or other evidence, fails to do so within the established period of time, without showing sufficient cause for such failure, the arbitral
tribunal may make the
award on the evidence before it.
The arbitral
tribunal may within 30 days after the communication of the
award make such corrections
on its own initiative.
Unless the parties have agreed otherwise, the arbitral
tribunal may order that pre-award and post-award interest (either simple or compound) be paid by any party
on any sum
awarded at such rates as the arbitral
tribunal decides to be appropriate (without being bound by rates of interest practised by any state court or other legal authority).
The arbitral
tribunal may, if it considers it necessary owing to exceptional circumstances, decide,
on its own initiative or upon application of a party, to reopen the proceedings at any time before the
award is made.
The party requesting an interim measure under paragraphs 2 (a) to (c) shall satisfy the arbitral
tribunal that: (a) harm not adequately reparable by an
award of damages is likely to result if the measure is not ordered, and such harm substantially outweighs the harm that is likely to result to the party against whom the measure is directed if the measure is granted; and (b) there is a reasonable possibility that the requesting party will succeed
on the merits of the claim.
The arbitral
tribunal shall in the final
award or, if it deems appropriate, in any other
award, determine any amount that a party may have to pay to another party as a result of the decision
on allocation of costs.
The arbitral
tribunal may rule
on a plea referred to in paragraph 2 either as a preliminary question or in an
award on the merits.
In a recently published decision, the Supreme Court set aside an arbitral
award on the grounds that the arbitral
tribunal had wrongly accepted jurisdiction.
(i) the final
award deals with a dispute not falling within the terms of submissions to arbitration as a Memorandum of Understanding («MOU «-RRB- had terminated the reference to arbitration, resulting in lack of jurisdiction
on the part of the
tribunal (the «Jurisdiction Issue «-RRB-;