Not exact matches
The alternative pathway, which the world seems to be
on now, is continued extraction of all
fossil fuels, including development of
unconventional fossil fuels such as tar sands, tar shale, hydrofracking to extract oil and gas, and exploitation of methane hydrates.
But it is also clear that, absent a price
on carbon emissions, as the price of energy rises, the amount of economically extractable
fossil fuels increases, including
unconventional fossil fuels.
It would make it much harder for countries to ban or impose strong regulations
on fracking for shale gas and other
unconventional fossil fuels, for fear of having to pay millions in compensation: http://www.foeeurope.org/no-fracking-way-report-060314
Tar Sands and
Unconventional Fossil Fuels In a previous post «Silence Is Deadly» I wrote, «The environmental impacts of tar sands development include: irreversible effects
on biodiversity and the natural environment, reduced water quality, destruction of fragile pristine Boreal forest and associated wetlands, aquatic and watershed mismanagement, habitat fragmentation, habitat loss, disruption to life cycles of endemic wildlife particularly bird and caribou migration, fish deformities and negative impacts
on the human health in downstream communities.»
Absent some crash programs for renewables (or temporary reprieve via
unconventional fossil fuels), civilization must get by
on a small fraction of the energy it now uses (and in far less convenient forms).
The climate movement is pointing out that
unconventional fossil fuel extraction techniques (fracking, tar sands excavation, deep - water drilling, mountaintop removal coal mining) are leaving or will leave toxic wastes and scars
on the landscape as the
fossil fuel industry gouges and lacerates the earth in search of combustible
fossil resources.
Jeremy Grantham, a billionaire fund manager who oversees $ 106bn of assets, said his company was
on the verge of pulling out of all coal and
unconventional fossil fuels, such as oil from tar sands.
Responsible policymaking requires a rising price
on carbon emissions that would preclude emissions from most remaining coal and
unconventional fossil fuels and phase down emissions from conventional
fossil fuels.
The alternative pathway, which the world seems to be
on now, is continued extraction of all
fossil fuels, including development of
unconventional fossil fuels such as tar sands, tar shale, hydrofracking to extract oil and gas, and exploitation of methane hydrates.
Contributions are sought
on (1) what
unconventional sources mean for the theory of peak oil; (2) what an explosion of new
fossil fuel emissions might mean for global climate change; and (3) what geological, economic, or policy forces might limit
fossil fuel production.
Government plans that include serious restrictions
on the use of coal and
unconventional fossil fuels have a chance at being compatible with avoiding dangerous climate change, while those that treat this as a side issue do not.
$ 1 million
unconventional oil and gas research program, which gathers critical data
on the extreme impacts of
fossil fuel development in the Marcellus and Bakken shale regions.