SOUTHFIELD, Mich. — Brooks Kushman is pleased to announce that the firm has been ranked by IP Watchdog as the 28th Top Patent Firm for 2017 based
on utility patent filings.
Not exact matches
A list of the top
patent firms that are ranked based
on the total number of U.S.
utility patents that issued in 2016 where the
patent firms...
We compiled a list of the top
patent firms, which are ranked based
on the total number of U.S.
utility patents that issued in 2015 where the...
As Gary Stix reviewed in «Owning the Stuff of Life,» in the February issue, companies and universities have been
on a spree of
patenting not only whole genes but also genetic fragments of unknown
utility.
Speaking at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (which publishes ScienceNOW), PTO acting deputy commissioner of
patents and trademarks Lawrence Goffney said that the office «has decided to allow claims to ESTs based
on their
utility as probes.»
Both the category winner for Process / Assembly / Enabling Technologies and the Grand Award winner, the IP
on the ’12 Ford Escape and Kuga cross /
utility vehicles is the largest automotive part molded using the
patented MuCell injection - molding process and the first IP formed with the process.
Having just received a design
patent on the device, the company is now focusing
on obtaining
Utility patent rights.
A U.S. design
patent granted to Honda
on Tuesday reveals that three
utility vehicles might not be enough for the Japanese automaker's American lineup.
In the past five years, the Canadian Federal Court has invalidated several
patents based
on an arguably «technical» deficiency — the «Promise /
utility» requirement.
Moreover, the specific disclosure requirements for
patents where
utility is based
on sound prediction is the consideration an inventor pays for obtaining a
patent without having proved actual
utility as at the filing date of the
patent application.
However, where the specification promises a specific result,
utility will be measured against that promise, based
on what is disclosed in the
patent specification at the filing date.
His practice focuses
on commercial litigation, including complex natural resource litigation, energy and mineral litigation, royalty and tax litigation, public
utility litigation, and
patent litigation.
The German
patent office has not yet ruled
on Samsung's challenge to this
utility model.
The German
patent office will most likely treat the Federal Patent Court's opinion on the photo gallery patent as binding case law for the purposes of the utility model revocation proceedings; if not, Apple can always ask the Federal Patent Court to review the decision, and a panel presumably consisting of partly the same people would probably affirm the previous decision in the new co
patent office will most likely treat the Federal
Patent Court's opinion on the photo gallery patent as binding case law for the purposes of the utility model revocation proceedings; if not, Apple can always ask the Federal Patent Court to review the decision, and a panel presumably consisting of partly the same people would probably affirm the previous decision in the new co
Patent Court's opinion
on the photo gallery
patent as binding case law for the purposes of the utility model revocation proceedings; if not, Apple can always ask the Federal Patent Court to review the decision, and a panel presumably consisting of partly the same people would probably affirm the previous decision in the new co
patent as binding case law for the purposes of the
utility model revocation proceedings; if not, Apple can always ask the Federal
Patent Court to review the decision, and a panel presumably consisting of partly the same people would probably affirm the previous decision in the new co
Patent Court to review the decision, and a panel presumably consisting of partly the same people would probably affirm the previous decision in the new context.
This ruling is not thermonuclear
on its own, but in its aftermath, we will not only see a lot of wrangling over a judgment as a matter of law to overrule the jury and over injunctive relief but there will also be, even more importantly, a push by Apple to enforce many more design
patents and
utility (hardware and software)
patents against Samsung.
On October 24, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the International Trade Commission (ITC), a quasi-judicial agency that can impose import bans on patent - infringing products, made an initial determination (preliminary ruling) according to which Samsung was held to infringe four Apple patents (one phone design patent and three utility patents
On October 24, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the International Trade Commission (ITC), a quasi-judicial agency that can impose import bans
on patent - infringing products, made an initial determination (preliminary ruling) according to which Samsung was held to infringe four Apple patents (one phone design patent and three utility patents
on patent - infringing products, made an initial determination (preliminary ruling) according to which Samsung was held to infringe four Apple
patents (one phone design
patent and three
utility patents).
On the other hand, implementing rules laid down in Regulation of the Prime Minister on filing and processing of patent and utility model applications, were amended in a manner making the process of rejecting computer implemented inventions more laborious for patent examiner
On the other hand, implementing rules laid down in Regulation of the Prime Minister
on filing and processing of patent and utility model applications, were amended in a manner making the process of rejecting computer implemented inventions more laborious for patent examiner
on filing and processing of
patent and
utility model applications, were amended in a manner making the process of rejecting computer implemented inventions more laborious for
patent examiners.
Just as Eli Lilly unfortunately found in atomoxetine, it is very difficult to switch from an unsuccessful argument for actual
utility to sound prediction — because one is left with only the disclosure of the
patent (and not the extensive tests relied
on for actual secret
utility).
The United States urges Canada to engage meaningfully with affected stakeholders and the United States
on patent utility issues.»
Although finding a compound
patent valid based
on actual
utility after construing a low Promise, Mr. Justice Rennie recognized (in obiter) there would be problems with a sound prediction of any higher Promise, and referred to the «common view» of the disclosure requirement of AZT as follows:
For example, if China was sued for violating a
utility patent on the Humvee design and a U.S. federal court found that it was a commercial activity of a state owned company rather than an act of the Chinese military, per se, the U.S. court could enter a judgment against China and the
patent owned could collect it by seizing U.S. Treasury bonds owned by China.
«This decision goes a long way toward realigning Canada's law
on patent utility with other major industrialized nations.»
Demonstrate aesthetic design or functional
utility, depending
on whether you're applying for a design
patent or a
utility patent.
As of Friday, July 1, «the application size fee for electronically filed
utility and provisional
patent applications will be based
on 75 % of the number of pages for the paper size equivalent of the specification (including claims) and drawings, and any external tables,» writes Bill Heinze.
We have a lot more certainty now that technical legal attacks
on utility of a
patent generally can not invalidate the
patent,» says Noel Courage, partner at Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto.
1999)-- Enforced Juicy Whip's
patent on beverage dispenser technology, including three successful precedent - setting appeals to the Federal Circuit
on issues of
patent utility, invalidity standards, and damages.
Currently I handle
patents and designs, focusing mainly
on patents and
utility models.
However, most
patent applications fail
on the basis of novelty, rather than
utility or functionality, so it can help to do a
patent search to make sure that your invention is unique.
Utility patents,
on the other hand, protect inventions — either entirely new ideas or improvements to existing inventions.
'' Knight and Associates claims to be the first
patent prosecution firm to attempt to obtain
utility patent protection
on fictional plots.
On appeal, Lilly argued the FCA ought to consider the Supreme Court's decision in NEXIUM, which changed the state of the law for
patent utility.
The Tribunal characterized the three elements of the promise doctrine as: (i) the identification of a «promise» in the
patent disclosure, against which
utility is measured; (ii) the prohibition
on the use of post-filing evidence to prove
utility; and (iii) the requirement for pre-filing evidence to support a sound prediction of
utility to be included in the
patent disclosure.
(1) a reward of no less than RMB 3,000 for the issuance of an invention
patent (no less than RMB 1000 for a
utility model or design
patents) to be paid within three (3) months from the date
on which a
patent is granted, and
Filing a
utility patent application
on your own is no easy task and carries too much of a risk for making a mistake.
This order was upheld
on appeal and again at the S.C.C. Apotex then commenced an impeachment action in the Federal Court seeking a declaration that the «777
Patent was invalid
on several grounds including lack of
utility.
the Promise
Utility doctrine discriminates against pharmaceutical
patents; no pharmaceutical
patents were invalidated for inutility until 2004; since then 23 pharmaceutical
patents have been invalidated based
on the doctrine
Utility analysis continues to consist of a lengthy and detailed review of the entire patent and law on u
Utility analysis continues to consist of a lengthy and detailed review of the entire
patent and law
on utilityutility.
As clarified by the Government of Canada in its reply factum, in fact three Canadian
patents have been invalidated solely
on the basis of
utility since 2005 — two of which are Eli Lilly's
patents that are the subject of its NAFTA challenge.
However, I can't see how the existence of other smartphone - related
patents (
utility patents as well as design
patents) would not have probative value: the single strongest argument for a narrowly - defined article of manufacture (just the casing) simply is that there is so much more in and
on a smartphone than just a very few, narrow designs.
The monopoly provided by a
patent lasts 20 years for
utility patents (as long as the proper maintenance fees are paid
on time) and 14 years for design
patents.
Excess Copyright Last Minute Discontinuance of
Patent Case
on «Promised
Utility» in Supreme Court of Canada
Further, let us not forget that the SCC has
on multiple occasions reaffirmed the principle that a mere scinitilla of
utility is needed for
utility to be demonstrated, which is a fundamental aspect of Canadian as well as European and U.S
patent law.
Contrary to Richard Gold's assertion, the Canadian promise of the
patent doctrine, the requirement to disclose the factual basis for sound prediction in the patent, and the prohibition on using post-filing evidence to establish utility, are not in line with US, UK and EPO jurisprudence, at least: see my articles Must the Factual Basis for Sound Prediction Be Disclosed in the P
patent doctrine, the requirement to disclose the factual basis for sound prediction in the
patent, and the prohibition on using post-filing evidence to establish utility, are not in line with US, UK and EPO jurisprudence, at least: see my articles Must the Factual Basis for Sound Prediction Be Disclosed in the P
patent, and the prohibition
on using post-filing evidence to establish
utility, are not in line with US, UK and EPO jurisprudence, at least: see my articles Must the Factual Basis for Sound Prediction Be Disclosed in the
PatentPatent?
Although the SCC has recently granted leave in Astra's esomeprazole action [12], both parties have acknowledged in their leave materials that the disclosure requirement is not determinative in this case (as the lower court held there was no sound prediction of the promised
utility relying
on material in the
patent as well as Astra's internal tests).
It appears Eli Lilly seeks to: abolish any substantive
utility requirement; and permit a patentee to show
utility based
on tests done a decade after they file their
patent.
There is a need for some explicit direction
on the proper framework as to what needs to be in a
patent and / or the public realm and / or inhouse tests in order to render a prediction of a certain promised
utility sound.
In that report we added a few links to our previous Patently Mobile reports
on Samsung's
utility and design
patents that described a new round watch interface along with an all - new rotatable ring or watch bezel controller which was confirmed today by Samsung's release of their new Gear SDK.
The jury also found that Apple proved by clear and convincing evidence that Samsung infringement was willful as to all the
utility patents at issue, in addition to the design
patents on the iPhone.