Sentences with phrase «on valid science»

Similarly, just because the CO2 theory is based on valid science, it may not correctly explain the cause of the recent warming.

Not exact matches

@Liz — It seems like the argument you are making is valid but only from the perspective of either creating a high risk of complication / retardation which science has proven when children are born to closely related people, and the «Ick» factor of not wanting to imagine two siblings getting it on.

My objective in this short essay has been to show that in «stripping off the shell of the out - of - date science, we find the permanently valid kernel of... [Aquinas's] thought on the soul,» as John Saward wrote in Redeemer in the Womb.

This great psychological / science community can never and has never conducted a valid study to show how one chooses to act on their orientation is not impacted by their environment.

ThinkForYourself, you babbled on about «Do you also not think that plate tectonics is valid science since you can't mash up South America and Africa in a lab?

As a science geek, I base my views on valid research and I have first - hand experience of what it is to be on a low - carb diet and have witnessed the incredible benefits of it.

I'm thinking «we» are learning a lot in science about health, nutrition and disease and closing in on some good findings, but we are not there are extreme recommendations that fall outside of the obvious — like we eat too much sugar and processed food and chemicals is uncalled for and probably not valid.

But this proclaimed «new science» has been here all along, before Ancel Keys report and the subsequent McGovern led Senate Committee, the Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs final 1977 report that contained a few valid dietary points, but vilified saturated fats and salt.

As a science geek, I base my views on valid research and I have first - hand experience of what it is to be on a low - carb diet.

I don't think the «Mystery Science Theater 3000» version of The Final Sacrifice stands up on its own two feet as a valid work of art.

Their performance on English math, English reading, or English science tests is not always valid.

Members of any branch of the United States Military, with a valid military I.D., will receive free admission into the Fort Worth Museum of Science and History, including Titanic: The Artifact Exhibition, on Saturday, January 12 and Sunday, January 13, 2013.

The problem with the older papers is that they based their calibrations on bits of the science that are no longer valid.

Smalley's views are utterly at odds with Climate Depot's robotic propagation of any content — valid or not — as long as it casts doubt on science pointing to risks from human - driven climate change.

My last post said I would re-research and post responses to your quite valid questions and concerns, and you come back and complain that I've not completed the task yet, and you call me lazy because I believe that science advances so relying on old cites is foolish.

«We often think of the sciences and the arts as completely separate — almost like opposites, but using music to share these data is just as scientifically valid as plotting lines on a graph,» he says.

Raising valid questions about the science that regulations are based on is acceptable, but misrepresenting science to affect the political process is not.

So, although I don't want RealClimate to lose its focus on the science, I think it's perfectly valid to address the issue of persuasion, and provide readers with tools to help.

It's always amusing to read in the «skept - o - sphere,» the thousands and thousands and thousands of comments on the subject of whether there is a «consensus» and even more interestingly, precisely how big that «consensus» is, from people who say that the noting the existence of a «consensus» is not only a fallacious argument, but that in fact noting that there is a «consensus» is antithetical to the valid practice of science.

To save the world from possible nuclear annihilation after WWII, nations and their national academies of sciences united under the UN on 24 OCT 1945 and replaced Einstein's and Aston's valid definition of mass (m) as energy (E) with Weizsacker's (1935) and Bethe & Bacher's (1936) flawed definition of «nuclear binding energy.»

On November 28, the paper told policymakers to ignore science because it could hurt jobs and increase economic hardship «in the name of global warming theories» its editors don't believe are valid.

«But that doesn't mean you give up on the science, and that you can't draw valid conclusions about the nature of Earth's temperature change,» he asserted.

Science, however, is based on the correspondence theory of truth, i.e. a theory is valid only to the extent it corresponds to observations of the natural world.

This latest report on the Science of Climate Change covered the key aspects of concern to those not part of the IPCC consensus, but did not involve them sufficiently, if at all, in developing the material and the result seems to be an official dismissal of the literature rather than a thorough development as is common for ideas necessary for the consensus view to be valid.

Scientists — and the universities where many of them work — rely on governmental agencies like the National Science Foundation to establish valid and transparent mechanisms to evaluate research proposals and to give financial support to the most deserving.

Indeed, on one side we have the valid results of climate science, on the other side we have the need for well justified policy advice.

Any lawsuits based on what the skeptic's go - to think tanks might believe about the climate science contained in IPCC 2007 AR4 aren't likely to get very far in the courts, because the EPA has already been successful in defending the process it used in evaluating and documenting the version of climate science it claims is valid.

I was addressing a specific and valid complaint on a segment within the «Science Under Attack» program.

That then allows people to believe that a view on obese people warming the planet is at least on a par with fact and can be perceived as valid science.

In this regard, with the wisdom that historical hindsight affords, everyone on Climate Etc can appreciate the wisely conservative governance of Ronald Wilson Reagan, in ratifying the Montreal Accords, as guided by the «inconvenient truths» of atmospheric science — truths that none - the-less are verifiably valid (V&V)!

Valid science is based on correspondence with observations of the natural world, not consensus anyway.

However, he recognises that critics of man - made global warming make valid points, and frequently debates the science with man - made global warming critics in blog discussions and on Twitter.

So in Chapter 3, drawing on standard social science content analysis procedures and the measures used by Boykoff, I provide the first reliable and valid data evaluating systematic patterns in mainstream coverage of the reality and causes of climate change for the key political period of 2009 and 2010.

They suggest that the Senate Minority Report criticized by the Credibility Project is just as valid as The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Physical Science Report - 2007, and one of them notes, correctly, that the full subtitle of this IPCC report is «The Physical Science Basis.»

It was a valid opinion on an uncertain area of science.

It is not an ad hominem to say that the peer reviewed literature is the most likely source of the most valid science and that we should rely on it instead of blogs for our science knowledge...

Without valid, rational justification, it's being driven by ideological belief, not not rational policy analysis based on valid relevant science.

There are hundreds of other meteorologists, many of them PhD's, who are as certain as I am that this global warming frenzy is based on bad science and is not valid.

That leaves many science educators free to include climate change in courses however they want — by, for instance, teaching the scientific consensus on climate change, or explicitly advocating skepticism as a valid scientific proposition as Heartland does.

On the one hand, he says that any reasonable person should've been skeptical two years ago due to valid points raised by skeptics (despite these points having been dealt with by mainstream climate science for * years *).

Likewise, if science shows like PBS NOVA started relying heavily on Exxon and Koch Industries funding — if the American Petroleum Institute started dictating policy to the National Science Teachers Association — if BP got to play a role in drawing up science curricula at California schools — well — the tobacco / fossil fuel comparison is fairly valid, isscience shows like PBS NOVA started relying heavily on Exxon and Koch Industries funding — if the American Petroleum Institute started dictating policy to the National Science Teachers Association — if BP got to play a role in drawing up science curricula at California schools — well — the tobacco / fossil fuel comparison is fairly valid, isScience Teachers Association — if BP got to play a role in drawing up science curricula at California schools — well — the tobacco / fossil fuel comparison is fairly valid, isscience curricula at California schools — well — the tobacco / fossil fuel comparison is fairly valid, isn't it?

This is completely valid and not on the same level as denying science.

The attacks on those who have very valid alternative models and hypotheses tells you what this is really all about, and its not science.

The blue planet has been abused with Black Body and Grey Body thinking but its valid on the basis of schoolkid science that some unfortunately missed.

The routine assumption that the analyses put forward of innumerate bloggers are just as valid as (in fact more valid than) as those of scientists who have devoted their life to the relevant field is one aspect of this, as is the constant demand to «teach the controversy» on evolution, climate science, wind turbine health scares, vaccination and so on.

There is as much junk science on the internet as there is valid science.

As a science geek, I base my views on valid research and I have first - hand experience of what it is to be on a low - carb diet Frequency about 5 posts per week.