Not exact matches
And that might be an
embryo that either doesn't implant, if it implants can lead to a miscarriage, or can be something that might be
viable but then has difficulties later
on.
There should be a complete ban
on the implantation of a human
embryo created by the application of cloning technology into a womb, or any treatment of such a human
embryo intended to result in its development into a
viable infant.
This is because of the obvious concerns about the heritability of the genetic alterations induced, and the way in which such research could spread from work
on «non-
viable»
embryos, to work
on viable ones once this type of research had been accepted in principle by international regulatory bodies.»
Our No. 2 story,
on gene editing in
viable human
embryos, reminds us of the many intricacies of human biology.
Information
on the
embryo quality rating was not available to clinicians during the IVF procedures that were part of the study, but when researchers unblinded the study results, they found that patients with at least one «high» rated
embryo transferred had a 54 percent
viable pregnancy rate compared to a 34 percent rate for those following transfer of only a «low» rated
embryo.
Although the
embryos were not
viable and not intended for clinical use, this proof - of - principle research raised ethical concerns and emphasized the need to continue to have discussions
on the scientific and social impact of this technology and its use in countries around the world.
Thus far (2016), there is no organism it doesn't work
on (CRISPR has been used successfully
on human cells, but not yet in
viable human
embryos).
The work was done
on 86 very early
embryos that weren't
viable, in order to minimize some of the ethical concerns.