Election surveys tend to focus
on voter preferences and voter turnout and not on who voters expect will win.
Not exact matches
Democratic
preference in both polls was slightly above data site 538's polling aggregator, which
on Sunday showed that 48.5 % of
voters who said they would support a generic Democratic candidate in 2018, compared to 37.6 % who preferred a generic Republican.
As
voters indicated their preferential ranking, you can eliminate the weakest candidate and redistribute the votes
on his ballots according to the indicated second
preference.
Ultimately the government will have to choose between large numbers of
voters choosing pre-determined
preference orderings by voting above the line or large numbers of
voters having their
preferences ignored because they did not express them properly
on the ballot paper.
Even a
preference for Clinton over Trump was not a guarantee that a
voter would turn out for Clinton
on election day.
Yet there are plenty of other voting systems, like the Single Transferrable Vote method used to elect moderators
on Stack Exchange sites, where
voters can honestly indicate their top
preference and have an incentive to do so, without the disincentive that this might help their least favored candidate win.
The full extent of the possible effects of agenda control was first noted by a colourful 18th Century French mathematician, the Marquis de Condorcet who in his famous paradox noted that in a situation with a tie between three options a
voter can determine the outcome of an election by voting insincerely
on one of their
preferences.
A: No mystery; because the Conservative Party is traditionally the second choice of relatively few
voters and they therefore wish to count weak second
preferences as
on a par with strong first
preferences.
Its critics contend that some
voters find the mechanisms behind STV difficult to understand, but this does not make it more difficult for
voters to «rank the list of candidates in order of
preference»
on an STV ballot paper (see Voting).
This profoundly granular information about individual
voters and their
preferences helped the campaign focus persuasion work
on the persuadable and GOTV
on the
voters likely to vote for their guy.
As noticed by Satterthwaite, the original theorem immediately implies that,
on the subset of configurations where all
voters have strict
preferences, the system is dictatorial (given the usual assumptions, i.e. non-manipulability and at least 3 eligible candidates).
The rest would be elected
on a corrective top - up basis designed to reflect
voters» party
preference more accurately.
Instant runoff voting, also known as ranked - choice voting, allows
voters to rank primary candidates in order of
preference so that if one candidate does not cross the required threshold for victory, the candidate with the least number of votes is eliminated and the votes are redistributed based
on the second choice selected by
voters who had selected the eliminated candidate first, and so
on until a winner emerges.
The Burnham team's polling found that of 29,020 eligible Labour
voters contacted between 15 July and 29 July, 37.3 % said they would support Burnham
on their first
preference, 27.6 % Corbyn, 9.6 % Cooper and 5.8 % Kendall.
Rural
voters may or may not vote based
on their economic interest, but economics in cities have generally deteriorated under Democrat policies, but it hasn't had a noticeable affect
on voting
preferences.
It is a preferential voting system so the
voter ranks the candidates
on the ballot paper in order of
preference.
The problem with predicted outcomes of AV based
on, for example, successive YouGov polls looking at
voters preferences is that they really only tell us about short term effects
on the relative position of the big established parties.
Results, they say, increasingly hinge
on the
preferences of a small number of
voters in a handful of swing constituencies which is undemocratic.
«The first is something that is really in your lap, and that is dealing with the runoff primary election,» he said, calling
on the Council to quickly implement instant runoff voting in which
voters get to rank multiple candidates in order of
preference.
In runoff voting
voters do not rank candidates in order of
preference on a single ballot.
Where preferential voting is used for the election of an assembly or council, parties and candidates often advise their supporters
on their lower
preferences, especially in Australia where a
voter must rank all candidates to cast a valid ballot.
It is also possible that, under A.V., swings could start to vary between seats even more than was the case
on 6 May, if
voters start to set even more store by the merits of individual candidates when allocating their
preferences.
It's worth taking a close look at the crosstabs, which include information
on favorability, support for President Obama and
voters»
preferences in the gubernatorial horserace — all of which will undoubtedly play a role in the general elections.
Similarly, the Alternative Vote places an artificial construct
on voter's intentions, forcing them to make second
preference choices - before they actually know the result, which inevitably would disproportionately favour the Liberal Democrats as being the «centre» party.
Voters are able to express a first and second
preference on their ballots.
This can lead to «
preference deals», a form of pre-election bargaining, in which smaller parties agree to direct their
voters in return for support from the winning party
on issues critical to the small party.
Academics at Essex University have analysed the 2010 general election results together with survey data
on voters» second and third
preferences, and estimated that the Lib Dems would have gained an extra 32 seats under AV.
Voters rank all candidates, and «surplus votes» (the votes that a winning candidate could have been elected without) are redistributed
on the basis of second
preference, and so
on.
There's no consensus
on the
preferences of Asian American
voters.
Two caricatured extreme positions of political strategy, held by no - one, are these: a) that
voter preferences are entirely fixed, and that the art of political campaigning is to choose where within the spectrum of fixed
voter opinions to place oneself to provide the best chance of victory whilst achieving the maximum of one's desired programme; b) that
voters can be persuaded of anything if one has truth
on one's side and argues for it with sufficient conviction.
But the Tories had not offered a guarantee of a referendum
on introducing the alternative vote electoral system, in which
voters rank candidates
on preference rather than place a cross against one candidate alone.
If no one gets fifty percent
on the first vote, all but the top two are eliminated and their
voters second
preferences reallocated).
The ERS report
on party funding looks at how to break down the stalemate by testing the latest recommendations against
voter preferences.
[4]
Voters were able to express a first and second
preference on their ballots.
The proportional election to the House of Councillors allows the
voters to cast a
preference vote for a single candidate
on a party list.
This system, already used in Northern Ireland, allows
voters to rank all candidates, and surplus votes are redistributed
on the basis of second
preference.
The new Government has said it will hold a referendum
on whether to replace our current voting system, first past the post, with the Alternative Vote, which allows
voters to express more than one
preference.
A more common concern about conjoint analysis is that it relies too heavily
on the stated
preferences of respondents, which would be problematic if
voters were unwilling to provide candid answers about subjects such as ethnicity.
In the end, Narwhal's apps and databases generated and analyzed millions of precious nuggets
on voter attitudes and
preferences.
The debate over programs and policies that grant
preferences based
on factors such as race and sex will soon be in the hands of California
voters.
A 2008 survey by Harvard University's Program
on Education Policy and Governance found that
voters greatly underestimate how much public schools cost and that their funding
preferences vary depending
on whether they are accurately informed or not:
When we draw a conclusions about what all
voters in Quebec prefer based
on premises describing the
preferences of a sample of Quebec
voters our conclusion goes beyond the information in our premises (here to
voters that we didn't sample).
On average,
voters believed New York currently enjoyed a roughly 25 % clean energy portfolio (the actual figure is lower), and they expressed a
preference for moving to far greater clean energy sources.
However, there may be important policy or political reasons to prefer one or the other in a particular context, such as
voter preferences or limits
on regulatory or legislative authority.
But, politicians are also susceptible to public
preferences, ergo better educated
voters could help boost lawmakers» willingness to work
on actual carbon tax legislation.
One is about public bus purchases and scrappage and the third is about learning about California
voter's
preferences for carbon mitigation based
on voting
on AB32 and High Speed Rail.
Facebook, Twitter, and Google possess intensely scalable tools for identifying
voter preferences, thanks to the scads of data their hundreds of millions of users provide, and aiming messages based
on that flood of data.
Nix claims that they possess between four and five thousand data points
on every potential
voter, after combining the personality test results with «attitudinal» data, such as credit card spending patterns, consumer
preferences, Facebook likes, and civic and political engagement.
Building psychographic profiles of individual
voters based
on their lifestyles and
preferences could be hugely powerful, thinks Chris Sumner, research director at the Online Privacy Foundation.