Sentences with phrase «on women marriage»

no there is no big sin or small one all our sinful but God created man and woman to marry i really do nt believe that men on men or women on women marriage will be acceptable in the sight of God.

Not exact matches

Although society has come a long way since a half - century ago, Buffett recalls a time when women were kept out of the workforce and predominantly told to depend on marriage as their path to livelihood.

A study from 2009 now getting buzz on the blogosphere explored the role marriage plays in the lesbian wage premium, and found that women who don't expect to be part of a traditional family spend more time investing in labour participation through on - the - job training and working longer hours than household skills.

The reasons why, however, are closely tied to the overall issue of why marriage is on the decline overall: women's equality.

It could also have a positive effect on womens» employment and careers by making it easier to balance work with home and childcare obligations — since men in heterosexual marriages still often aren't doing their share on that front.

Though they have made their mark in the private sector, these men and women are taking public stands on hot button social and environmental issues ranging from gay marriage to climate change to gender equality.

The same issue can thwart women who try to get on an income - driven repayment (IDR) plan after the end of a marriage, said Dean.

But Podesta and his candidate want to force a religious order of Catholic women to cooperate in the provision of contraceptives and abortifacients; they want to compel small businesses to cater to same - sex marriage ceremonies; and they want physicians to refer troubled patients for «transgender» treatment — all against the Catholic understanding of the right to act on one's conscience (in these cases, one's rightly formed conscience).

I'm with Obama on this gay marriage: Marriage between a man and woman should be «gay» meaning happy, enjoying each othermarriage: Marriage between a man and woman should be «gay» meaning happy, enjoying each otherMarriage between a man and woman should be «gay» meaning happy, enjoying each other always.

When we understand these two bookends of the Bible as framing the whole Christian mystery, the marriage of man and woman takes on its true nature as an image that points us towards our ultimate destiny marriage to God.

No, it's more than anything, chick fil A chains» religious freedom to donate for its belief on marriage definition, that it should be between a man and a woman..

(i) a woman's right to choose; (ii) teaching evolution in school; (iii) medical immunization of teen girls against HPV; (iv) assisted suicide; (v) gay marriage; (vi) my right to view art and theatre deemed «offensive,» «blasphemous» or «obscene» by theists (vii) basic $ ex education for older school children; (viii) treating drug abuse as principally a medical issue; (xi) population control; (x) buying alcohol on a Sunday; (xi) use of condoms and other contraceptives (xii) stem cell research.

I'm a progressive Christian and liberal on 90 % of political issues including marriage equality and women's rights; however, I think that this should be seen as a tipping point for Christians everywhere.

Christian women should dress modestly (no showing too much skin, no luxury) and keep purity before marriage as if life depends on it, just like the Biblical women did.

This reminds me of the way the church deals with critical issues today such as women's rights, racism, sexual abuse, sexuality and gender, same - sex marriage, corruption among its leaders, and so on.

In 2014, the McArthur family who own and run Ashers, turned down the cake order because they said the slogan on the cake would conflict with their Christian belief that marriage is between a man and a woman.

If plural marriage is God's highest ideal, then why are there approximately EQUAL numbers of men and women on the planet?

So, in reality here... is there truly any big difference from overtly telling you to vote yes on prop. 8 because gay marriage is wrong, vs. saying... It is a «correct principle» that marriage should (only) be between a man and a woman...?

Wolfinger looked at the numbers of sexual partners a woman had before marriage, and then, after putting them into groups based on the self - reported number, looked at how many were divorced after five years.

There's even a whole sub-category specifically about sex: The Act of Marriage, Intended for Pleasure, Celebration in the Bedroom... Many of these types of books have an almost myopic focus on a woman's obligation to have sex with her husband.

Women are people, with our own internal worlds and ideas to contribute to our marriages, but according to many Christian resources on relationships that's not what wives are for.

Ragansteve, And in those hundred years, we have seen women obtain the vote, the end of child labor, the end of Jim Crow laws, civil rights for blacks, the end of segregation, the end of the prohibition of mixed race marriages, and the list goes on and on.

The women who are not legal wives might decide to leave the «marriage» (a lot do), and may then go on to marry men like you.

All the tasks that are on the womans shoulders in a traditional marriage can be shared among the wives.

I am all for freedom of marriage, but I would be on the side of the FLDS if women were allowed to have multiple husbands.

While I don't agree w / the fact that marriage should include any two people that are consenting... yes I'm for only a man and a woman... I don't see how anyone from the GLTB community could ever look down on polygamy.

That's exactly the fighting spirit so sadly missing from so much of the stylish literature on men, women, and marriage today, as «What Does Woman Want?»

The sky is not falling because other people live their lives differently from you and have joined their lives in marriage... Spend your time, energy and emotions on a topic that really matters - like world hunger, the pursuit of justice in the world, violence against women, natural disaster relief - these are issues that need your attention..

Soon it will start allowing abortions, supporting gay marriage, women priests, and so on.

I'm going to say pro-life and anti-gay marriage because I believe you'd be hard - pressed to find an atheist who believes it is okay to deny women control over their own reproductive health and the ability to decide whether or not to carry a pregnancy to term or, likewise, who believes it's okay to deny marriage to a couple based only on gender orientation.

In the Netherlands, slightly more marriages between women are recorded than between men: between 2006 - 2011 on average 690 and 610 per year respectively.

Reacting to the result on Wednesday, Archbishop of Sydney Dr Glenn Davies said in a video posted online: «Although this won't prevent me from continuing to teach that marriage, in God's good design, is between a men and a woman... the reality will be, in a very short period of time, our Parliament will legislate for same - sex marriage.»

So far Rush has been wrong about everything from womans reproductive rights, endangered species, climate change, how laws and bills are actually passed in congress, drugs, alcohol, gay marriage, marriage (what is he on now his 5th?)

@Rachel, Many Atheists are simply trying to counter-act the influence of Christians in their lives, such as science in science class, gay marriage, stem cell research, women's choices on reproduction.

@ 0G - No gods, ghosts, goblins or ghouls — agreed the Bible says that — but strangely - every culture on this planet in no way recognizes that marriage is anything other than a man and a woman.

I won't go into great detail about why I oppose this re-definition that most civilized societies have accepted as the normal... based on religious and spiritual basis that marriage was between a man and a woman.

Biola then issued a «statement on human sexuality» saying, «God's design for marriage and sexuality is the foundational reason for viewing acts of sexual intimacy between a man and a woman outside of marriage, and any act of sexual intimacy between two person of the same sex, as illegitimate moral options for the confessing Christian.»

I will be unafraid to hold different theology on women, on marriage, on life.

Same goes for theologies that suggest the poor are poor because of their sins, that if only the sick had more faith or gave more money they would be healed, that the tsunami or the earthquake or the flood that devastated a community was clearly the result of God's wrath on its gay inhabitants, that we can stop rape by teaching women to cover up better, that sex before marriage makes a person «broken» and «unwanted.»

Single women argue both for their right to have children outside of marriage and their right to raise children with no father on the scene.

And yet the majority of Christian marriage books dole out advice based on gender stereotypes: «men need adventure,» «women need security,» «men like quiet time,» «women process verbally,» «men crave respect and control,» «women crave love and emotional intimacy,» «men are like microwaves,» «women are like ovens.»

Of course if anyone looks up, «No man knows my history» by Fawn M. Brodie, or «Under The Banner of Heaven, or Secret Ceremonies: A Mormon Woman's Intimate Diary of Marriage and Beyond,» as well as google different questions about mormon secret names, White Horse Prophesy, Mormons becoming Gods, God was once a man on another planet, mormon bigotry against Blacks, Joseph Smith and his 14 year old wife (WHILE he was still married to his living wife Emma) Helen Mar Kimball... I could go on.

I give to you what I give to no one else, and that is my seed, my procreative power, which, united to your seed, can incarnate our love, take on flesh that will be the living fruit of our love, the proof also that we want our love to be a gift to God and to the future.1 I have expanded on this at length elsewhere.2 Holding to our present topic, let us look a bit more closely at those issues of justice involved in this divine plan of the union of man and woman in marriage.

Further rulings, according to the report, approve polygamous marriage and enforce a woman's duty to have sex with her husband on his demand.

But he also has his rights in regard to married couples - which means that, in marrying, a man and a woman also take on special duties towards God: duties to marry so as to create a home, duties to accept generously the children God wishes to give them, 6 duties to maintain a united marriage and a united home that will both keep the spouses engaged in the task of learning to love, and help the children grow in the reflection of their parents» and of God's love.

A barrage of such stuff, pouncing on any scandal that could be dug up and chipping away at the pontificate of Pope Benedict, not to mention the usual stuff about the need to elect a pope who would change the «policy» of the Church over such matters as abortion, gay marriage and women priests, had been unleashed almost immediately, once Benedict had been congratulated for bringing the papacy into the 21st century by resigning.

In a homily in Nazareth on 14 May 2009 Pope Benedict dwelt on «the sacredness of the family, which in God's plan is based on the lifelong fidelity of a man and a woman consecrated by the marriage covenant and accepting of God's gift of new life.

Therefore, applying the heart of the gospel to the contemporary challenges to marriage and the family must by founded on restoring men and women to true friendship with God by immersing them in the truths he has revealed.

Both psychotherapy and middle - class marriage isolate women from each other; both emphasize individual rather than collective solutions to women's unhappiness; both are based on a woman's helplessness and dependence on a stronger male authority figure....

Finally, prohibiting polygamy on «feminist» grounds — that these marriages are inherently degrading to the women involved — is misguided.