Sentences with phrase «on y»

So come on y ’ all... with a nod to the past and an eye to the future I'm gonna share with you a few old fashioned ways to put a song in your heart and a spring in your step so you can bless your home, your family, your country!

Good on all y ’ all.

On a y / y basis, the Composite index rose 9.2 %, a fourth softer reading in a row following the record gains of 14.2 % in both June and July, and the lowest since June 2016.

Today, the company wrapped a real home for sale in Austin, Texas, leaving a giant blank spot on the block, asserting that if you only search Zillow, you may be missing out on y our dream home.

This is a MUST SEE on y

The affect grid is a 9 × 9 matrix of squares that measures valence on the x-axis (ranging from very negative on the far left to very positive on the far right) and arousal on the y - axis (ranging from very low arousal at the bottom to very high arousal at the top of the grid).

Here is a histogram of the average of these two items (N on the y axis; each speed - dater rated ~ 12 targets): We might be missing some exceptionally attractive people, but otherwise, this looks pretty uniform.

If he doesn't know he'll just carry on y» know?

Scale on the Y - axis is not the same across panels A, B and C.

Prepared financial analysis vertical / horizontal with special emphasis on Y / Y comparative approach on results for Liquidity, Leverage, and Profitability ratios.

Back on the Y Combinator beat, which startups from the incubator investing group have managed to generate the highest valuations?

The font size choice gives you an exact superposition on the x-axis but it can throw your rendering off on the y - axis due to some typesetting approaches in the print version.

They show the projected local temperature change (on the y - axis) for every degree of global average temperature rise (x-axis).

Note that the bottom right - hand chart is showing a different metric from the other three (night - time coldest temperature rather than daytime hottest) and has a different scale on the y - axis.

That's a nice graph you have here, but unfortunately there are no units on the Y - axis.

Also, I can see this gaining (or at least staying in the news) in the same way this theory has (without specific debate to merits) because it's about a pop - culture relevant topic and apparently History Channel is already making a program on «what really killed the dinosaurs» much like they did last year on the Y - D impact to coincide with the «10,000 BC» movie.

Nowhere in this graphic do I see suggested that there is a fixed periodicity (the 2 slashes in the time scale clearly indicate a cut) nor does the graphic suggest that it shows real temperatures, in fact there is no scale on the y - axis.

Make the.5 C change of the 10 decades in the «hockey stick» rise look a bit paltry — it's just the starting and ending points are at different places on the Y axis.

Is the unit on the y axis degrees C / 100?

What is on the y axis?

But I'm wondering why there are no units on the y axis.

Mathematically, the transformation is equivalent to imposing a prior probability distribution on Y that has the form 1 / Y2.

In this sense the likelihood as function on Y in the original paper and the likelihood presented as function of S in WG1 report tell exactly the same thing about the empirical results.

Updated to state these errata: in the print edition of Nature Climate Change, the «0.0» label on the y - axis has been misprinted as «0.6», and the caption credits «Climate Change Foundation», not «Climate Code Foundation».

Also he did not say what he was plotting on the Y axis, we were led to believe that it was ºC in subsequent answers to questions.

In Steve's August 20, 2010 at 8:39 pm post, he says «It is just a simple numerical integration of degrees on the y - axis vs. years on the x-axis done by counting pixels.

It is just a simple numerical integration of degrees on the y - axis vs. years on the x-axis done by counting pixels.

Your graph does not advance your cause, if the temperature range on your Y axis is supposed to be global something.

Plot temperature on the x-axis, the probability that the daily high is above some temperature on the y - axis (so actually one minus the cumulative density), and put vertical lines showing the historical mean + / - one, two, or three sigmas.

In the video, on the y - axis the units suggest an average between 200 and 250.

The scale on the y axis suggests we are talking about minutia in any case.

If we could plot a graph with C02 volume on the x axis and temperature on the y axis then the relationship between C02 and temperature would by described by a curve that eventually flattens out.

I can of course just plot the likelihood as a function of y ^ 2, which is equivalent to assuming a uniform prior on y ^ 2.

The red curve on the y - axis is centred on the 14C age derived by measurement (the radiocarbon or 14C determination) and shows the likelihood for that determination as a function of true 14C age.

The blue calibration curve shows the relationship between true 14C age (on the y - axis) and true calendar age on the x-axis.

If we could plot a graph with co2 volume on the x axis and temperature on the y axis then the relationship between c02 and temperature would by described by a curve that eventually flattens out.

Notice the label on the y - axis.

This quasi-phase space diagram plots standardized anomalies of global relative atmospheric angular momentum (AAM) on the y - axis and global relative AAM time tendency on the x-axis.

http://webpages.charter.net/wtelle/Warming/Vostok.jpg These are data from the Vostok ice core, units not implied on the y - axis because the scales have been normalized to track changes.

In response to comments by Bob, sky, & lgl: Some light can be shed on this discussion of anomalies & base years via 3 - D plotting (with month on the y - axis and using color on a z - axis).

I am not really impressed by your variations on y - axis; why start from zero?

On the y - axis (vertical), mark off five units in both the positive and negative directions, and on the x-axis (horizontal), do likewise.

It shows net top - of - the - atmosphere radiative flux on the y - axis and temperature on the x-axis.

The histogram on the y axis uses the relationship between the past and the future to obtain a projection of future changes.»

To be useful and scientificaly rigorous I should replot all the data, with all the GRIP data in a different color, with the y axis marked on the right side with actual GRIP temperatures, and GISP2 temperatures marked on the left side, lined up so the 1855 data in both sets was the same on the y axis.

That dotted line is high on the Y axis if it is supposed to be showing the average loss.

The graph you showed has no attribution and no units on the y - axis, but notwithstanding this there are several problems with your argument based on this graph:

Particle Studio uses the plain for ground collision which is set at zero on the Y axis.

In Bullet Bill form, you can't change your position on the y - axis and you'll immediately transform back to plain old Mario when you run into an obstacle.

During Q3 FY18, Take - Two's recurrent consumer spending (virtual currency, add - on content and microtransactions) grew 64 % on a y - o - y basis and accounted for 32 % of total net revenue for the reported quarter.