Scientists are also looking to biological processes (many of which also serve as carbon dioxide sinks) as complementary or alternative regulating mechanisms of greenhouse gases
on the young Earth.
If there was a lot more volcanic activity
on the young earth blocking out a weaker sun, it seems to me something else was keeping the oceans from freezing.
Plimer went broke because he tried to sue a Creationist for misleading and deceptive conduct under the old Trade Practices Act for handing out pamphlets
on young earth creationism.
They provide the first direct data
on the young Earth soon after the solar system coalesced from a disk of gas and dust 4.57 billion years ago.
The fossils, which date back 3.7 billion years and predate the world's previous oldest stromatolite fossils, could point to rapid emergence of life
on a young Earth.
That challenges orthodox thinking about conditions
on the young Earth, which would not have had a significant oxygen atmosphere for at least another billion years.
The story traces back to the early 1950s, when chemists Stanley Miller and Harold Urey of the University of Chicago in Illinois tried to recreate the building blocks of life under conditions they thought resembled
those on the young Earth.
«Based on our discovery, organohalogens are likely to be a constituent of the so - called «primordial soup»,
both on the young Earth and on nascent rocky exoplanets.»
On the young Earth, continents were recycled all the time.
Take a good look at this photo: It shows you 1.6 billion years old fossilized oxygen bubbles, created by tiny microbes in what was once a shallow sea somewhere
on young Earth.
On the young Earth, pockets of liquid could have expanded into a network of channels that mixed their contents during freeze - thaw cycles, like day - night temperature changes in summer.
Why are you acting as if Rubio is running his campaign based
on young earth creation?
The Earth being younger than the radiometric age of 4.5 billion years old is based
on the Young Earth Creationism religious belief.
His work is indeed fascinating and shows some of the great mysteries of the universe with possible explainations (though string theory is a joke), but again, I don't see how he has disproven any religion, beyond Fundamentalist Christianity that insists evolution isn't real or that we live
on a Young Earth.
You must be willing to accept your position
on a young earth based on science alone without any reference to the Bible.
Now it is but not back then (and the people
on the young earth creationism side are back then).
Not exact matches
To prepare for our future in low -
Earth orbit, cislunar space,
on the Moon, and
on Mars, we need to foster a diverse pool of qualified, enthusiastic
young people who are inspired to further the off -
Earth dream.
No, just over 40 % are
young earth creationists, based
on their infantile beliefs in the Easter Bunny, or some other fictional character.
The changes
on the
earth's surface due to tectonic plates shifting has to be accelerated if Ham's model of a
young earth is true.
check this out: «Richard Dawkins versus
Young Earth Creationist Politician» Richard Dawkins vs Steve Fielding
on «Q&A»
on March 8th, 2010
Absurd:
young earth earth created before the stars birds created before land animals Pi = 3 bats are birds not mammals the list goes
on and
on...
As I sat alone in a room wondering f I was living my last day
on earth — the things that went through my head were exactly what this author touched upon in her article and that I had felt during my illness in my
younger days.
A selection of statements
on this blog by
young earth creationists in just the last few days: Nope..
Yeah, they probably don't even believe in other stuff like talking snakes, a
young earth, walking
on water, virgin birth, and all that other everyday stuff that wacked - out Christians believe...
Happy
young lovers, who've ascended together into the heavens of Venus and of Love, where joys, so brief
on earth, will now, above this world, endure forever and forever.
We get a
young earth / universe and a general date of around 6,000 years because the Bible is very specific
on time.
While mainline publishers of religious books and church - school curricula have been virtually silent
on the subject, there are currently in print more than 350 books challenging evolutionary science and advocating a «creation science» based
on six 24 - hour days of creation, a «
young -
earth» dating, and a worldwide «flood geology.»
It is the barren Hannahs, the
young Davids and innocent Marys who hear and believe, and further God's reign
on earth.
In addition to his advice to the
young ruler, there was his clear injunction to store up treasure not
on earth but only in heaven, his rather pointed remarks
on the impossibility of dual service to both God and Mammon, his parable about the rich man and Lazarus (which was not, I think we can grant, merely a warning against dissipation), and so
on.
But if you don't champion the place of the arts within the Body of Christ, if you don't encourage
young Christians to pursue the calling God has put
on their hearts, if you don't train up your creative troops to stand and fight, then why
on earth would you — would we — expect to see the Church being anything other than routed in the world of entertainment?
As I've said many times before, I'm not particularly interested in converting
young earth creationists into evolutionary creationists.I believe that Christians should be able to fellowship together in love and unity regardless of their various positions
on the interpretation of Genesis Being neither an Old Testament scholar nor a scientist, I'll leave that debate up to the experts.
Or if you were witness to that lovable
young man's beautiful enthusiasm when he read and heard of the great men who fought with a heavy destiny and suffered badly in the world, the glorious ones whom
earth renounced because it was not worthy of them, would you dare, when no clamor caused your speech to wander but when the stillness of intimacy, of the lovable one's confidence, the in experience of the
young man, all obliged you to tell the truth; at such a time would you dare lay your hand
on your heart and say, «Such things no longer happen.
One only need search for «
young earth geology»
on youtube to get a plethora of videos from a Dr Snelling who was referenced a few times by Ham in the recent Ham - Nye debate.
At most he is arguing against Creationism and more specifically,
Young Earth Creationism, which is a pseudo-science supposedly based
on Genesis.
The stories you hear and the things you hear in this documentary will break your heart for these poor
young girls who are caught into the darkest and most evil web
on earth.
Most of the rest of the schools — about 25 percent — mix progressive creation and
young -
earth creation, both having an emphasis
on God's intervening acts of special creation.
I find it surprising that the majority of Christian posters
on this blog are
young earth believers, which has to be one of the stupidest of the Christian cults.
They have no more right to force their ways or beliefs
on me than the
young earth creationists have to force theirs
on our public school children.
My problem is the lies that «there are no true scientists» who hold to a
young earth, that there's no evidence for it and that there's nothing published
on the subject.
(I and Thou, p. 39; Two Types of Faith, p. 8; Martin Buber, At the Turning (New York: Farrar, Straus &
Young, 1952), «The Dialogue between Heaven and
Earth,» p. 53; Between Man and Man, «Education,» p. 90 ff.; Martin Buber, «Remarks
on Goethe's Concept of Humanity,» Goethe and the Modern Age, ed.
And it is ironic that Mohler, who has been a tireless advocate for
young earth creationism
on the basis that «the straightforward and direct reading of [Genesis] describes seven 24 - hour days,» does not seem to think that a straightforward and direct reading of Jesus» teachings regarding violence is necessary.
yeah i think we should be far more intersted in the hells we make
on earth then worrying about eternal life — a theology conjured up when people died much
younger.
One only need search for «
young earth geology»
on youtube to get a plethora of videos from a Dr Snelling who was referenced a few times by Ham in the Ham - Nye debate.
The
Young Earth Creationist stance
on cosmology has no legs to stand
on.
They had already determined that evolution could not be true based
on their religious convictions, and so any logical or scientific inconsistencies within the
young earth creationism model were dismissed with a shrug of the shoulders and a pithy statement about the mysteries of God.
By the way Joel there will be a resurrection of both the righteous and unrigtheous here
on earth, the
earth will be brought back to its orginal state, you are not going to heaven, a mere
young boy will touch the head of a cobra, this good news of the kingdom will be preached throughout the entire inhabited
earth, seek first the kingdom (God's earthly government) try to put a few of these points together in its proper context Joel.
«Who covers the heaven with clouds, provides rain for the
earth, makes the grass grow
on the hills, gives food for the cattle, to the
young ravens when they cry to Him.»
As I said earlier today
on this blog, it's not «creationism» that's being rejected per se, but rather «
young earth» creationism.
The Blessed Sacrament, the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Christ
on earth, must be at the heart of any spiritual event for
young Catholics, through the Mass, Exposition and His reservation in the tabernacle.
But it often seems like people are constantly telling
young married couples to «invest in their marriage» without explaining what
on earth that actually means.