Sentences with phrase «one share holder»

There is no share holder buyer of last resort, and so equity buyers can demand a higher return than bond holders.

A mutual fund custodian usually maintains and holds all records, sales redemptions and trades of the share holders... A mutual fund custodian may but not always, act as the mutual fund transaction agent... Since a mutual fund is basically a pool of several funds and not one common stock, it's essential that a 3rd party is involved to maintain, and oversee the funds operations...

But despite the recent setback, it's hard to feel too bad for Apple share holders, who have enjoyed one hell of a ride.

Again, form a casual «share holder» perspective — there was nothing not too like.

If all Base bond holders have been paid but the price is still too high, the protocol distributes Basecoins to Base Share holders under the impression they will sell them in the open market, until the price decreases back to the target price.

Fossil fuel company's need to recongnize this, and use their large cash flows to fund renewable energy investment to give share holders the best returns available.

Along with that, came media advertising expense and the need to assure huge profits for their share holders and support business management overhead which was not previously a part of health care.

If the company offered stock for their best customers, I would be one of their top share holders.

While Dangote has TALKED about getting shares, Ustmanov has already taken action and tried to buy Arsenal, he got blocked though by the old board when they made that pact to not sell the club into a single majority share holder who was foreign, the foundation of the pact they made and bragged about to us fans.

You see Wenger has share holders to keep happy so he will buy young and cheap and hope he strikes it lucky so he can sell at a big profit.

Like you, I went through years of total frustration and bewilderment at how a once so honourable club, could now behave in this morally corrupt, though legal, fashion, disrespecting us fans, with extreme arrogance both by manager, board and Owner (I point out the recent AGM and Sir Chips KESWICK»S disgusting behaviour towards the share holders, which sadly, is no longer even surprising) I have pledged not to give another penny of my honestly earned money to this cancerous club, which however I still love with all my heart.

Wenger is taken the Micheal.This just goes to show he has no ambition other than making money for the share holders and no doubt he is one.

That's why we need a new majority share holder, because getting rid of Wenger means setting up a whole new board structure, no one will come in and take all Wenger's responsibilities, and Kroenke won't sanction setting up proper governance.

If he was the majority share holder I think Wenger would be in a much pressurised job.

I have just understood that Arsenal's majority share holder — Stan Kroenke, is launching a TV channel, in the UK, dedicated to the blood sport of hunting endangered wild animals such as lions, rhinos and elephants.

Share holder or not some grown a ** men need to quit being so dramatic and constantly seek attention.

He is the main share holder, and if they want to find a reason to give him money they will.

In a dream world then Silent Stans shares would be sold to different wealthy Arsenal supporters who want Arsenal to win stuff, we would not be reliant upon a sole share holder.

Achieving 1st place is too expensive So Arsenal has been a top 4 sustainable model club since 2009 when Mr Kroenke became majority share holder.

The American businessman who is the majority share holder in Arsenal is a «sports» fan not a purely football / soccer fan.

Dein got forced out by profit orientated owners, they bump the share prices up with little actions like promise us fans that they will not sell to a single majority share holder only to turn around and sell to Silent Stan once enough was offered.

Our major share holders could provide money to support Arsenal FC but refuse to.

Forced out by a board that then promised not to sell to a foreign majority share holder... then sets Silent Stan up as majority share holder.

When we had a board member, a share holder who was a fan and gave his heart to it fully, then we could compete with Chavski and City.

Without that backing Wenger was ending up with bargin basement versions of the types of players we used to get, no more Dein, no more share holder backing and guess what... The team gets more and more players that are just not good enough but Wenger has to make do.

Even Arsenal majority share holder was happy today seeing his club lifting trophy today.

Wenger take the job and he know the pros and cons so don't tell me he don't know he got responsibility to answer to the fans or they are just entertainer and we are just pay to watch customers, as long there is profit for the share holders will do.

We have share holders.

He is all about the share holders that why he is buying all these kids hoping to come across a good one so he can sell him for a bucket load of money, Not to put back into the club but More money for his Masters to Bank.When Wenger and the Board look out at the full stadium on a Saturday they don't see Fan's they see customers.It would not surpries me if Wenger bought a one legged blind man, so Carrick is a possibility.

When your majority share holder says he doesn't control a club to win tropheys then you don't need to know more than this.

Dein was a share holder at the same time...

Kroenke has said that earning money is more important than winning trophies as a majority share holder in arsenal, and thus wenger or other managers in arsenal will not get the title - aiming spending pants from the board.

And what makes you think a protest and you lot demanding a change of wenger bould board players stewards fitness coach share holders ect ect ect is going to make us be top again let's rip up everything it's taken 10 years to build and start again very clever

We can look at the pact made by the old board, you know the pact they made not to sell and allow a single foreign majority share holder run the club... The same pact that got threw out the window when enough was offered?

Dein use to do the transfers before he was forced out of the club by the previous share holders after he wanted to invest in the club while we was going through the stadium move.

Wenger and Arsenal are a biusness, top 4 means success to the share holders.

When Wenger arrived there was Dein, an Arsenal fan who wanted to win things, winning I guess was a goal for Wenger as Dein was a share holder and active in the club.

What is our direction, toward a top club or just maintain a big club with constant profit for the share holders.

He is also a board member and a share holder I believe.

You are more or less spot on mate, But, I am not of those that point any of the blame on the board or the majority share holder, if anything, Wenger has been given more control of the club since Kroenke took over!

Jonm; As a major share Holder no one can throw them out, but with no profit, from ECL TV revenue, less TV revenue from EPL, and class come player willing to come to Arsenal like last year Aubumeyang refused and Vardy snubbed, 2 years ago Suarez refused to come, pretty soon they are forced to sell and get out or buy and compete with big clubs like MU, MC, CHELSEA LIVERPOOL SPURS and even LEICESTER.

Our majority share holder holds very little passion for the football club with the history that comes with it, the guy who owns walmart isn't exaclty known for doing the right thing over profit.

Dein got forced out by a board that made a pact to not sell to a single foreign majority share holder, they wanted Arsenal to stay a multi-owner club with no individual holding more than 51 % of the shares.

I will not argue that the team has some players in it which wouldn't have been bought into the team in Wengers early years, this is not Wengers fault, Wenger is a consistent variable here... It is Wengers support from the backroom staff and those are hired and fired by the board which is being lead by the majority share holder Silent Stan.

Thats right, the share holder David Dein supported Wengers buys.

Anyone who is a TRUE fan of Arsenal knew what was going to happen when a share holder who works within the club gets forced out for profit.

Dein was forced out and the old board done everything they could to raise the share prices before they all sold, they even made a pact not to let the club be owned by a majority share holder!!!

I have supported (watched / season ticket holder plus a share holder back in the 70's) the team since 1958 when I was 6 — I lived within walking distance of the old ground — I have given up I do not care any more — I will not watch them on Tv or go to a game.

This time though the board I belive got greedy and thats why they made a pact to not sell any more shares and made claims that we would not be in the situation where we have a share holder with the majority.

So please re-evaluate your own thoughts about Wenger being the fault, this was never the case up until Gazidis came to AFC, Wengers FRIEND Dein wanted investment into the club and was a share holder, he sold his shares to try and get that investment to the club... Wenger has said that he and Dein are close friends, you think close friends wouldn't of discussed something as big as Usmanov coming into the club?