Sentences with phrase «only a striker who»

Our strikers record in EPL Sanchez = 0 goals Sanogo = 0 goals Campbell = 0 goals Akpom = 0 goals Giroud = out for 4 months Podolski = Only striker who has scored EPL goals

The only strikers who get consistent approval on this site are lewandowski and aubameyang, neither of which are available.

This means not only a striker who is comfortable receiving the ball out wide, but who has discipline and the experience of marking a fullback.

Not exact matches

Gunners fans have been longing for a top striker to join the club in recent seasons, but the only arrival to challenge up front has been Danny Welbeck, who has just been ruled out for the next nine months.

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

Higuain has been so good for Napoli in recent years that he is now in front of Sergio Aguero, who only started one of five games at the Copa America, in the Argentina pecking order and the Man City striker is widely regarded as one of, if not the very, best forwards in the Premier League.

Why should we buy even though we are 4 players down (Arteta, Flamini, Rosciky & Wellbeck through injury) from last season, we have only one striker who last season went 15 games without scoring.

Arsenal appear to only be on the look - out for a challenger to Olivier Giroud, and Jese could be an affordable striker, who at 23 years - old, could still prove to be a shrewd capture, especially when you consider the Spanish giants opted to keep Jese over Alvaro Morata last term.

We can only wait and see, but according to a source who seems to find some inside information (Pablo) who I mentioned in a previous post, he does state that Wenger is closing in on a Striker deal which he describes as being madness!?

The Spanish striker is not the only footballer who looks a lot like a dog, though.

my only hope is wenger to buy kanté of leicester.this guy is a beast at dm position with a good technical and physical quality.with him and coq in midfield against barca we can hope for anything special to happen.with finally olivier giroud slowly becoming WC striker, walcott most efficient and campbell who is a revelation this season, the return of alexis we can be dangerous against any defence.our only weak position is a dm position and wenger won't have any excuz this mercato bcoz there are players available that we can buy if we want.plz wenger go for at least one of this: kanté, wanyama, w.carvalho, l.bender, krychowiak, biglia, neves, l.gustavo, rabiot... if we try to sign s.roberto he will be a good addition with great quality.gunner for life!!!

I would not say «Don't worry, we have a young player who has never scored any goals and never proven himself at any level — and we also have an still - injured Walcott who has only played striker a few times — we are fine.»

And not only that he does that, but he uses Welbeck, a guy who fails to score a goal even if it's just him and the goal, as the main striker, even though he has Giroud on the bench, a guy who scored a goal in the first game.

Manchester United striker Radamel Falcao, who has scored only four goals this season, was made to play for the club's under - 21 team in an attempt to improve his match fitness.

i get where you are going at but not a lot of the top teams were in the need of a top striker the ones who were already bought a striker at the start i.e. chelsea and man u and man city (nolito) and tottenham, of course there should have been other top clubs in search of a striker but i think it shouldn't be a knock - down that we were the only one who triggered the clause but i agree with all the other things you said the its absurd to compare him with griez and vardy and we have to be patient with him

People are saying that we have paid too much for a striker who may score goals in the French Ligue 1 but who has not really shone on the international stage and who may struggle in a tougher league, while there are also questions about why Arsenal seemed to be the only real suitor for the Frenchman.

People slate Xhaka but i have said this before he is the only one who looks for making through balls for the strikers and passes the ball FORWARD.

Few years ago we had 3 good strikers in our squad adebayor, Eduardo and v. Persie now we have only one giroud who is worse than all of them and wenger thinks he will score 30 goals this season what an idiot, liar, dumb, greedy, over confident, clueless, uncaring 4 th place comedian.

He can score 30 goals a season but still i don't think that we can win league with him... When he scores only he scores, but Arsenal as a team doesn't look dangerous, I really prefer a dynamic kind striker like welback, Who can make runs from behind the Strstriker like welback, Who can make runs from behind the StrikerStriker...

Everyone n football and most of the same fans know Sanchez is our only player of quality, Henry said he is the only player who would get into the Spurs squad, and we play him with one hand tied behind his back on the left wing with effectively no existing central striker to worry defenders (unless you count Giroud as a central striker but I refuse to believe Giroud worries any central defender).

So on one hand you would prefer a striker that only has 2 seasons in him and is possibly just a one season wonder, and on the other hand you would prefer a striker who scores less than Giroud and hasn't shown any sign of full filling his so called «potential» people keep talking about?

Giroud is our only out - and - out striker, if he picks up a big injury, who do play?

Are we really surprised by Wenger though?this is the same manager who only signed a goalkeeper with no outfield players in the last summer transfer window and this is the same manager who brought in an injured CM Kim Kallstrom on loan when we were leading the league in January 2014 and we needed a striker!

Wenger is fully to blame he's the one who picked Debuchy and Gibbs who couldn't mark or defend, he's the only who continually picks Giroud who's an awful striker!

He was also acting like Khabib has never faced a good striker before, did he forget he was the only one who could stop RDA back when he was smoking the whole division?

@john0711 it's people like you I don't get.Do you know Chamakh may have been a worse player than Giroud but let's be honest Chamakh was a better finisher than Giroud.Even him was labelled as garbage.Can someone name a striker with exception of Gervinho (man he was awfully out of this world) who played for Araenal who Giroud had better finishing than.Giroud is to me part of Arsenal's worst finishers ever and please let's not deny it and note I considered only «finishing»..

The only regret is we have lost a good chant for a striker who was / is never prolific and went through too many barren spells with his goal scoring.While the Chavs put more and better crosses into the box (yes take note Bellerin) Giroud has no pace to get on the end of most of them.No great loss as far as I'm concerned and good money for a bench player at best

It's difficult to blame Ozil for the difficulties he's faced at Arsenal without looking at the big picture... like the fans, he too was lied to by Wenger... there is no doubt in my mind that he was told by Wenger that he was trying desperately to recreate our earlier success by acquiring players that fit the system he ran when Henry was in his prime... as we know this hasn't happened... in order for Ozl to flourish he needs some speed up front, forwards that can make intelligent runs, a boss in the midfield to compensate for his obvious defensive liabilities and defenders who can transition from defence to offence quickly and efficiently... much like he had in Real and with the German National squad... unfortunately he ended up on a squad that has a striker who plays with his back to goal, very few intelligent runs into the box, minus Sanchez, no one to take pressure off him in the midfield, once Cazorla was injured, average defensive midfielders around him, which simply highlighted his lacking defensive qualities and defenders who lack the necessary cutting edge when it comes to transitional passing... instead of blaming Ozil, which is simply too easy, especially considering his mopey disposition, we should be asking ownership and / or Wenger why they brought him in if they didn't intend on doing what was necessary to get the best from him... can you imagine Ozil playing with the likes of Henry, Viera, Petit and Pires, it would be incredibly to watch and even more difficult to stop... so the only thing different between his experiences in Real and with the German team versus his time at Arsenal are the players around him and we all know who is in charge of making those decisions, the Grinch who stole soccer

It occued to me the other day that we sold Van Persie... who at the time was our talisanic striker for just six million short of what we paid for Lucas Perez, am I the only person in the wold that see's this as odd?.

«Only one signing of significance, and one who in [Alexandre] Lacazette, for all his skills and finishing, is not a complete striker.

You only have to look at Chelsea languishing in 13th place after winning the league last season, Liverpool losing 3 - 0 at home to West Ham after spending over 50 million pounds on Benteke and Firmino and United losing to Swansea for you to realize that strikers won't decide who wins the league.

That double also puts him into the top 10 leading goalscorers for the France national team and to withing three of the former Arsenal striker Sylvain Wiltord who took 92 games to reach that number while Giroud has only played 60.

With Chambers and Debuchy arguably not of a higher quality than Jenkinson and Sagna, it leaves Wenger only improving in quality through a substitute goalkeeper and a striker who he is currently playing out of position on the left wing.

WE MUST BUY SOMEONE who can make the difference, look I see only Ox and Sanchez are capable of breaking top defenses, Ox isn't reliably fit (injuries) and Sanchez can have bad days, so we must buy a striker with the same caliber of Sanchez (not size) to stand any chance of winning the epl title....

26 year old Jarvis was perhaps one of only two players who impressed at Molineux during last season's poor showing, the other being striker Steven Fletcher, and the former Gillingham man certainly deserves a chance to make an instant return to the top tier.

I really do nt see any legs in any of these stories about any more transfers, The evidence is all there among all the smoke and mirrors, Look at the evidence, Wenger stated that Giroud would lead the line next season and as such we have have only seen any real movement towards buying a striker in the purchase of Asano who clearly is nothing more than a shirt selling move.

I know a good striker will arrive, only I don't know who.

Szczeny winning the golden gloves only got us 4th Without a quality DM to totally dominate the midfield And a striker who needs only half a chance, Forget it.

It means manager Louis van Gaal will be left with somewhat of a selection headache as the only recognised striker in his squad for the clash in the Netherlands is youngster James Wilson, who is yet to start a game this season.

It was his new Italian striker Pelle who settled this afternoon's final pre-season friendly against Bayer Leverkusen — albeit not in the way he would like, with Pelle's own goal the only thing separating the teams.

i will say this again, Giroud is the only true striker we have at arsenal and would have had a better goal average, if we had true wide players at arsenal, who actually cross the ball properly.

He has a mule of a striker in Giroud and only buys a replacement on the last day of the season in wellbeck (who is miles better anyway) We sell vermalen and don't replace him..

Let me remind you of the 2013/2014 window where we had a good chance of winning the title... our dear manager in the January transfer window signed only Kallstrom, an injured player, who couldn't play until April while we still had a chance at the title and logic suggested he needed to bring in a striker.

The same Chelsea won the league with a striker who scored only 19 goals, two of which were scored after the league was long won if I am not mistaken.

Wenger likes certain types of strikers and the only time i recall him getting a player who is all about finishing is Jeffers, we know how that turned out... there was Suker & Eduardo too but they had something more also a high class of finishing ability especially Suker.

I am yet to see anyone here who believe we don't need a striker but cry babies tend to act like they are the only one who see it.

Owners NESV have apparently made it clear to Roy Hodgson that they will only look to hand him funds for transfer additions that are long term prospects for the future and a move for a striker nearing 30 who has also had two horrific leg break injuries would not appear to satisfy this request.

Arsenal not only have Champions League football again next season, unlike Manchester United and Chelsea who will surely be interested if he becomes available for transfer, but Arsenal are also the only team in the Champions League places crying out for a striker.

Put it this way, i'll be gutted if Arsenal don't buy at least one top striker, annoyed if we don't buy a top CB who's dominant in the air and only a bit disappointed if we miss out on Kante or Xhaka.

We are the only ones in the top 6 who find the needs to rotate frequently our strikers because we simply don't have one that can do it all with no injuries & CONSISTENCY...