The stat closest to my experience is
only about abortion: that between 1 and 2 percent occur after 20 weeks.
Not exact matches
In the last few presidential elections, the strategy of the Republican presidential candidate has been to
only talk
about abortion when asked.
This is
only the latest example of a subterranean theme found elsewhere in popular culture: namely, tacit rejection of the idea that
abortion is
only about «my body.»
i saw poll results recently which indicated that 3 of 4 christians felt «strongly»
about same - sex marriage and
abortion, but
only 1 of 4 felt «strongly»
about adopting orphans or sheltering homeless.
Gorsuch would not talk
about his personal views on
abortion or the case, but would
only say that the case is now a precedent.
This still
only means the real number is more likely around 19 - 20 million annual reported
abortions worldwide than your number of 46 million which is based on conjecture
about the number of unreported
abortions each year.
Their lived experience of the effects of contraception,
abortion, divorce, and infidelity on their generation has made them passionate
about the need for our entire culture - not
only Catholics - to embrace the challenge andauthentic freedom embodied in the fullness of the Church's teaching on marriage, family, and sexuality.
For the sake of liberals who are (understandably) queasy
about defending
abortion on its merits, Democratic politicians like to pretend that Planned Parenthood offers mammograms (it doesn't), that it is a common source of pre-natal care (it's not), and that
abortion represents
only 3 percent of its services (the real number is unclear, but far higher — though again, it doesn't help our cause to inflate it to 94 percent).
He could not shut
about outlawing
abortion even through I provided evidence that it would
only increase the number of
abortions.
Most young people do know that the Church teaches, for example, that
abortion is wrong (sometimes it's
about the
only thing they do know
about the Catholic Church!)
Only azzhole mentally ill delusional believers get worked up
about it, conveniently ignoring the fact that 75 + % of all
abortions in the USA are had by believers.
The opponents of
abortion would have more credibility if they also cared
about babies after they are born, not
only before.
CNN Polling Director Keating Holland had this to say
about the findings: «
Only a minority of the rank - and - file members of both [Republicans and Democrats] take an extreme position on the issue, with just 31 % of Republicans calling for a complete ban on
abortion and just 32 % of Democrats saying that
abortion should be legal in all circumstances»...
I care
about the life people like you are attempting to force in to this world, you care
about what appeases your god - big difference when you really don't care or consider the child
only what your imaginary friend god wants and yet your god cause
abortions all the time... you care
about a clump of cells, not the actual life of the child and that's much worse than me supporting the rights of a woman to have control over her body, especially if the clump of cells couldn't survive outside of the host.
Finally,
only 29 percent of respondents recalled hearing
about abortion.
The
only thing Mitt is «consistent»
about is that he is INconsistent and has flipped on
abortion, gun rights, gay rights, healthcare, tax cuts, minimum wage, Vietnam, and climate change.
And the truth of the matter, most slugs making noise
about abortion are
only concerned with tax money being used, which in of itself clearly shows they do not know anything
about the law, and the use of tax funds for
abortion, because it is already illegal.
The latest Zogby poll, reported in November 2002, reveals not
only that Americans in general are becoming more conservative in their views
about abortion, but that young people are significantly more pro-life than their parents.
«I fear that many women are simply not provided with enough information
about their options, and so they choose
abortion because they think it's the
only way out of a difficult situation.»
Only about 15 percent of Americans claim there is an unlimited right to
abortion all the way up to birth minus a day, and I don't believe these people are all obsessive ideologues by any means.
If you don't want your money killing children, then the funding of
abortions isn't the
only thing you should be worried
about.
Here's the bottom line: the final decision when it comes to
abortion should be left to one person, and one person
only: the woman thinking
about having one.
Only about one - fifth of the fully secular and less than one - third of the nominally religious are pro-life on
abortion.
After that start talking
only about religion, God, cultural values,
abortion, family values, «common man», and blame all the problems the country faces on liberals, Obama, France, Europe, the Chinese, outsourcing,... in short everyone else, except themselves.
She said she is heartbroken and angry
about the Vatican's doctrinal assessment that the leadership group representing most American nuns has been challenging the church's doctrine on homosexuality, the male -
only priesthood, artificial birth control, celibacy and
abortion.
Now let's see if he can convince the rest of the bishops and cardinals and lay folks... who
only seem to want to talk
about contraception and
abortion... to turn their attention to helping families who are living in motels, sleeping in cars and waiting in line for free dental care.
I'm talking
about delaying stem cell research, spreading misinformation
about contraception /
abortion, denying GLBT rights and highjacking science with christian -
only based creationism (not comparative religion).
Justice White was even more emphatic
about the grounds on which
abortions could be regarded, in his judgment, as not
only unjustified, but debased:
Also, some states have cut all funding for organizations like Planned Parenthood, which can be one of the
only options for women to get low cost birth control and HIV testing.What
about about many
abortions occurring for women who already have children?
It called for a dialogue on
abortion among Catholics — a dialogue that would acknowledge this situation of pluralism, not
only in regard to practice (Catholics have
about the same proportion of
abortions as Protestants in the United States), but in regard to the ethical state of the question.
Whatever one thinks
about its legality,
abortion has nothing to do with advancing human «health,» and a large number of Americans regard it as a gravely wrong act of violence, not
only against unborn children but also against women.
I've written
about personhood before and it's really dangerous; not
only would it make getting an
abortion akin to murder, but it could also criminalize women for their actions while pregnant, such as drinking or smoking pot (even for doctor - ordered medical reasons) or cigarettes, or engaging in certain risky sports or careers.
Many of these women do reportedly choose
abortion, but for those who don't, there lingers not
only significant rape trauma, but what to tell the little one once he or she starts asking
about their origins.
Part of the difficulty with creating a new understanding of adoption - including the women who chose it, the families who adopt, and the children who are adopted - is combating archaic adoption practices that not
only reinforce negative stereotypes, but also do an incredible disservice to what adoption can be - that is, adoption is a legitimate pregnancy option for all women faced with a pregnancy decision, regardless of whether they identify as «pro-life» or «pro-choice,» religious or not, conservative or liberal... In the face of a pregnancy decision, the women who choose adoption feel no more part of the political discussion around it then the women who choose
abortion feel
about the political rhetoric characterizing their decision.
As for Bramson, what can you say
about someone who ran on issues that are
only important in statewide or national elections (i.e., gun control and
abortion)?
Previously,
abortions beyond this point were
only legal to save the mother's life, but the «health» standard has raised concerns
about a broader law than the initial statute.
But taking misoprostol on its own
only induces
abortions about 40 per cent of the time, so many babies are born after failed
abortion attempts.
In addition to the defective potentialities here, we're also talking
about only a very small fraction of the nuclear transfer units, the cloned embryos, actually will make it to term, so that we'll have a very high level of spontaneous
abortion.
In addition, those who fall between the «pro-life» and «pro-choice» camps — those who believe
abortion should be legal
only in the cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the pregnant woman — are 12 percent less likely to have heard
about another having an
abortion than are those who believe
abortion should be generally available.
Here's the worst of all this -
only one day after spending the weekend with him and we had a long talk
about our relationship and six days after I had an
abortion (that's right
abortion) of his baby do I catch him on the dating website.
Not
about to have a baby, Donna takes the steps necessary to go through with having an
abortion,
only to discover the
only open appointment at the local clinic is on Valentine's Day.
The Human Contract is so overloaded with clumsily delivered exposition that it's easy to imagine Pinkett Smith giving Clarke a 300 - page rundown of his character's backstory, with the caveat, «
Only about 5 percent of this actually makes it into the film, but for instance, the fact that your character wouldn't pay for his high - school girlfriend's
abortion informs several later scenes on a subliminal level.»
Please note for but one example that even as Judd Apatow's «Knocked Up» was praised for its realism
about pregnancy, it
only brought up
abortion once — as a joke, as in «Rhymes with «Schma - smortion.»
Abortion Term Papers: Treat Them Seriously There exist some topics, which are rather difficult to write
about as they demand a lot of responsibility from the students, and not
only from the point of view of the studying process and grade receiving, but also from the point of view of moral and ethics.
the censervtives wake up, McCain is for global warming and
only God knows what will his position
about abortion in future for the sake of his own interest in the election.
Apparently I am not the
only Factcheck.org reader to contact the National
Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) and ask questions
about Factcheck.org's negative review of NARAL's ad campaign against the Supreme Court nomination of Judge John Roberts.
This type of
abortion only takes
about 5 to 10 minutes.
About the
only bright spot for reproductive rights supporters was the defeat in Mississippi of a ballot initiative that would have sharply restricted women's access not
only to
abortion but also to various contraceptive methods by defining a person under state law as «a human being from the moment of fertilization.»
There are
about 1.2 million
abortions a year in the U.S., whereas we
only complete 120,000 total adoptions a year (60,000 from the foster care system and 60,000 voluntary adoptions).
Because we obtained data on federally reimbursed Medicaid expenditures from CMS, the questionnaire for Medicaid agencies asked
about state -
only expenditures by the agency (expenditures for which no federal reimbursement was claimed) on family planning services and supplies, sterilization services and
abortion services.