Sentences with phrase «only about dividend»

It seems like I've been writing only about dividend growth stocks for what seems like forever.

Introduction It seems like I've been writing only about dividend growth stocks for what seems like forever.

Not exact matches

However, in my three decades of experience coupled with reading about markets before my time, the only strategy that I see standing the test of time is to buy solid blue chip dividend - paying stocks from diverse industries, hold them for the long term, and diversify them properly with a judicious allocation to bonds and cash.

Compared to the broad XIC, XEG has a) a price to earnings ratio that is only slightly higher, b) a price to book ratio that is lower, c) a debt to equity ratio that is about half of XIC, d) a dividend yield that is comparable and e) profit margins that grew 30 % this year versus 18 % for XIC.

Although it «s only a rather small dividend increase, I «m more than happy about it.

I only got about $ 4000 for the whole of 2011 in dividend income.

Based on the Dividend Discount Model (DDM) with a 10 % discount rate (the target rate of return), if the company grows the dividend by an average of 7 % per year for the long term, then the fair price is over $ 90, compared to the current stock price of only aboDividend Discount Model (DDM) with a 10 % discount rate (the target rate of return), if the company grows the dividend by an average of 7 % per year for the long term, then the fair price is over $ 90, compared to the current stock price of only abodividend by an average of 7 % per year for the long term, then the fair price is over $ 90, compared to the current stock price of only about $ 83.

The current annual dividend payments will only total about $ 53 million, which means there's plenty of cash remaining to expedite debt repayments, increase the quarterly distribution, and fund growth projects.

Only the total market produces the historic long - term returns that investors aim for (about 9 percent since 1929, with dividends reinvested; about 10 percent since 1990).

The quarterly cash payout from dividend stocks is one of the only certainties in the stock market and have accounted for about 40 % of the long - term return on stocks.

After recently mentioning that I would consider an investment in the Vanguard Wellington Fund if I wanted to create wealth in such a way that I did not have to spend much time thinking about investments or intended to pass the ownership stake on to someone that did not have much knowledge about investing (i.e. if you wanted to turn your children into trust fund babies in a way that they could not ruin it, you'd want to set up a restricted trust that only permitted the kids to receive the interest and dividend income generated by the fund, perhaps with the instruction that the assets transfer into an S&P 500 index fund if the Wellington Fund were to ever cease to exist).

@Bluejeansman I take it you are talking about LS20 and (maybe) LS40, because only funds with more than 60 % fixed interest (or cash) assets have their dividends taxed as interest.

Through this analysis, we see that dividend strategies are not only about income or yield, but also about how their various combinations of factor loadings may compliment portfolios through factor diversification.

As of today, we're only getting about $ 2,000 in dividends in our non-retirement accounts that we can spend right away.

The index fell slightly from year - ago levels, and even after adding in returns from dividends, the S&P's total return was only about 1 %.

1910 In the early 20th century, most investors only cared about dividends.

Given the wild popularity of dividends these days, I'm surprised the daily trading volume averages only about 13,000, compared with more than 100,000 for Claymore's S&P / TSX Canadian Dividend ETF.

I can only dream about where I'd be if I saved and dividend invested even 10 % of my income from 18 on... I understand the pain lol But like you said, it's the way you learn.

Your portfolio allocations look good and about the only suggestions I have are for you to consider bumping up your Canadian stock component mainly because Canadian dividends get much better tax treatment and you don't have currency fluctuations to worry about.

He takes out about $ 80,000 per year in dividend income and trades only about four stocks a year, preferring to keep a stable of big blue - chip stocks to do the heavy lifting.

Let's remember foreign equities are typically about 30 % to 40 % of a balanced portfolio, and the withholding taxes apply only to the dividends, which are likely to be in neighbourhood of 2 % to 4 %.

I am not sure specifically about what you are asking and would like to hear on this myself but I don't believe there is any disadvantage per se because I know there are programs that do dividend reinvestment and that results in fractional ownership of a share until it becomes a full share and while only your «whole» shares are «traded» when it comes to actual worth, your fractional count too, so I assume from that if you had «whole» shares no matter what the amount, you'd be proportionally invested as anyone owning more shares, just to a lesser extent.

I am only concerned about acquiring stable dividend paying stocks at reasonable valuations.

If we only count the 420 S&P 500 dividend - paying stocks, and if we assume they pay dividends 4x per year (quarterly), that's 1680 dividend capture opportunities per year, or about 140 per month.

Therefore I will pass on the financial analysis this time and only talk briefly about the OHI dividends.

One example is SPDR S&P Dividend ETF, which is invests only in high divided stocks, and currently owns assets worth about $ 10 billion.

Through this analysis, we see that dividend strategies are not only about income or yield, but also about how their various combinations of factor loadings may compliment portfolios through factor diversification.

Despite the company's solid track record of raising its dividend for 26 consecutive years, we can see below that dividend growth has only averaged about 3 % for most the past decade.

1910 In the early 20th century, most investors only cared about dividends.

When you look at the graph, think about what you could do with a dividend - based strategy or even a TIPS - only approach.

What's more, once you receive your dividend payout, there are only two rules to live by if you're actually serious about building a nest egg you can depend on.

With SM not only did I get rid of my bad debt mortgage, but I have a healthy after - tax investment income from the dividends / distributions — I don't have to worry about how to «manage my RRSP» so as not to screw up my retirement.

In his blog, Jason talks about how he came from being worth more as a baby than as an adult to having a $ 200,000 portfolio that is set to generate over $ 7,000 in dividend income this year after only five years of saving and investing.

About the only thing you need to do in a 60 - year investment is to stop reinvesting the dividends at the end, and perhaps gradually selling the investments if you don't want to leave an inheritance behind.

Between 2001 and 2014, however, only about 1.6 % of total returns came from dividends.

I've been thinking about UNP and NSC for a while and every time, I see it racing ahead and only recently, it is correcting and dividends are just ok.

This increase only added about $ 0.36 to my next dividend payment but every little bit helps.

Indeed, for the vast majority of common stocks, Ben Graham looked at book value only as an anchor to windward, a hedge against being wrong about earning power and dividend payments.

Using our $ 50,000 figure from the discussion about building a nest egg, if you can get an average dividend return of 10 %, you would need only $ 500,000 to retire.

However, it trades north of 21x core earnings, has only traded for about a year after being spun - off (not much track record), and the dividend exceeded free cash flow for the last 9 months.

That being said, even at today's historically attractive valuation multiples, investors should likely only expect to earn a potential total annual return of about 5.9 % to 6.9 % (1.9 % yield plus 4 % to 5 % annual earnings growth) over the next decade, far below the company's historical return rate and the returns offered by most other dividend aristocrats.

He said investors should think about dividend growth not only in the large cap space, but in the mid - and small - cap space as well as international.

While the market surged 734 % over the entire period, and the average equity fund moved by 589 %, the asset allocators increased only 384 %, about half the gain of the averages (all figures are dividend adjusted).

What gets me is people who only look at the index number when talking about how long it takes for equity investors to recover their investment after a crash which ignores dividends.

So well that the dividend income my personal portfolio generates is just about enough for me to live of off — and I'm only in my early 30s.

I will sometimes hold VTI in RRSPs, or VUN in taxable accounts, or both (the dividend yield is only about 2 %, so it's more tax - efficient than international / EM ETFs in a taxable account.

I was investing in Mutual Funds all the way and the information here (about CG, Dividends and online brokers) gives me the idea that the ONLY proper way to invest money OUTSIDE of RRSP would be in Stocks and ETFs.

Think about it this way: If the investment is only capable of earning capital gains (for instance, stock in a company that has stated it will never pay dividends), then it doesn't qualify.

Quite honestly, the only real attention I pay to quarterly earnings (because of the variability) is to provide some guidance about the scale of annual shareholder distributions (regular & special dividends, plus share buybacks).

So when I talk about attractive property yields, clearly that's only going to attract smart income investors on a look - through basis, not the dividend dummies... But meanwhile, we've had plenty of «growth» investors & «flight to quality» investors climb on board.