According to quantum mechanics, an atom can
only absorb a photon of particular energies and colors as the electron within the atom hops from a lower energy state to a higher energy state.
Not exact matches
But
photons can
only travel so far through air or optical fibers before the material
absorbs the particles, limiting the distance over which communication is possible.
A study in the journal Nature Materials details the creation of a nanowire - based technology that
absorbs solar energy at comparable levels to currently available systems while using
only 1 percent of the silicon material needed to capture
photons.
Only a
photon that comes in with energy higher than the amount needed to power up an electron will get
absorbed.
Photovoltaic cells, which
absorb photons from sunlight and convert them to electricity, operate with
only 20 percent efficiency.
The frequency at which
photons are emitted or
absorbed is small relative to the rate of energy redistribution among molecules and their modes, so the fraction of some molecules that are excited in some way is
only slightly more or less than the characteristic fraction for that temperature (depending on whether
photons absorption to generate that particular state is greater than
photon emission from that state or vice versa, which depends on the brightness temperature of the incident radiation relative to the local temperature).
An individual molecule can
only directly vaporize from an
absorbed photon if that
photon possesses enough energy to transfer to the molecule so that it can overcome the heat of vaporization barrier.
-- For the
photons of interest, it is
only the GHGs that are
absorbing / emitting: if gas molecules don't have quantum transitions with the right energy differences, they can't interact with the
photons.
How does a CO2 molecule, somewhere up in the middle troposphere, KNOW that it is
only allowed to
absorb upwelling radiation
photons from the surface and must ignore all the other
photons coming at it from all around in the atmosphere?
However as no additional heat or energy is
absorbed (
only that from the first generation
photons) any temperature change would be very marginal.
Whether there is 0.03 % or 0.04 % of CO2 in the atmosphere
only influences how often the
photons get
absorbed and re-radiated on their way to space — an increase in CO2 delays the process a little but does not change it fundamentally and * Does * * Not * * Trap * * Heat * any more than a sieve traps water.
And the CO2 molecule
only «holds» that energy for a faction of a second, so a given molecule could in principle
absorb many
photons every second.
Or put another way, if there is so much water vapor around (3 % vs
only 390ppm for CO2), and more GHGs means more warming, why does the GHE stop at 33C instead of continuing until all the water vapor
absorbs a
photon OR asked another way, who says that all the water vapor caused by the added CO2 will
absorb a
photon to cause more GHE warming?
It seemed an appropriate response to the apparent view that each
photon gets
absorbed only once — and that was what heated up the atmopshere.
The discrete energy levels can
only absorb the exact wavelength corresponding to their energy separation, they don't
absorb a
photon which has too much energy and then discard the excess!