Sentences with phrase «only accept paper»

Most of the big publishing houses only accept paper submissions and therefore it is important that you submit a professional looking manuscript.

Lederman does not want to create The Journal of Last Resort, and vows to only accept papers about interesting immunology and infectious diseases — his original title for the online, open - access publication.

Not exact matches

Founded by anarchic ethical hacker collective Ztohoven, the cavernous ground floor space is fitted with the industrial light fittings and paper honeycomb furniture found in hip cafes, but there's a difference — the only form of payment accepted is the cryptocurrency Bitcoin.

There are several further references to ages of millions and thousands of millions of years, and to commonly accepted geological terminology, throughout the paper but, to spare the lay reader, I will only summarise them here:

He also told his local paper, the Western Telegraph, that he only accepted the position at the DWP on the condition that cuts to the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) would be dropped.

Not much to say about it, but remember to keep tweeting good stuff and not only «another paper accepted in Nature».

Although I have only been a postdoc for a little over a year, my first paper (a first - author paper), was accepted this past September and another paper was recently submitted.

They also defended the unusually rapid review of the paper, which was accepted only 4 days after official submission and published online 12 days later.

Mandl pointed out that nobody would publish his own ideas (he'd tried); only Einstein would be able to get a paper accepted.

But the editorial team of the Journal of Natural Pharmaceuticals, headed by Editor - in - Chief Ilkay Orhan, a professor of pharmacy at Eastern Mediterranean University in Gazimagosa, Cyprus, asked the fictional Cobange for only superficial changes to the paper — different reference formats and a longer abstract — before accepting it 51 days later.

The fees are slightly higher if an author joins only when submitting their first paper or when it has been accepted.

As for peer review, it means only that reasonably qualified scientists examined the manuscript and recommended changes to improve the paper, or recommended that the paper be rejected; the journal editor has to make a determination about the merits of the paper based largely, but not entirely on the reviewers» comments (the editor has some discretion in deciding to accept or reject — his / her reputation as an editor, and the reputation of the journal, depend on sound editorial judgments).

Characterized by instability and lack of accountability, Milwaukee's voucher program has resulted in numerous stories like one last year in a local paper about a minister and his wife who accepted $ 2.3 million in taxpayer funding only to close their Lifeskills Academy abruptly during the school year.

Some conferences only accept scholarly papers while others accept a brief, informal overview of the presentation you plan to give.

Lots of schools accepted multimillion - dollar grants to go small, but many did so on paper only.

For example, Harvard accepted only 7 % of the more than 27,000 applicants (about 2,000 students), in the process rejecting many of the 3,300 applicants who ranked first in their high school class and many with perfect scores on one or more SAT papers (2,500 scored a perfect 800 in the SAT critical reading test and 3,300 had a perfect score in the SAT math exam).

It» s like selling paper that accepts only red ink.

You can actually do a lot without paper checks nowadays (I only use one per year for car taxes, as they do not accept anything else), but many people shake their heads about even online banking and would never trust it.

Most carriers accept paper checks, while some allow bank drafts (but only if you're paying monthly), and some allow you to use a credit card only on your first premium payment.

A breeder that will only accept cash is probably trying to ensure that there's no paper trail, which means they may disappear once money as changed hands.

We mentioned the RAOBCORE project at the time and noted the big difference using their version 1.4 vs 1.2 made to the comparison (a difference nowhere mentioned in Douglass et al's original accepted paper which only reported on v1.2 despite them being aware of the issue).

If your local authority does collect wrapping paper for recycling, only non-foil paper will be accepted.

Indeed, throughout the Science Bulletin paper on Why models run hot, it is self - evident not only that I and my co-authors, including Dr Soon, accept that our returning some CO2 to the atmosphere from which it originally came will cause some global warming, but also that we are thoroughly familiar with the scientific reasons why — all other things being equal — more CO2 in the atmosphere will cause some warming.

These allegations were reported gleefully in the Boston Globe, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Nature, Scientific American, and many other media outlets and news pages of science journals in a manner calculated not only to divert attention from the conclusions of our paper but also to damage Dr Soon's reputation in his scientific calling, to put his employment at the Center at risk, to deter more serious journals from accepting future papers bearing his name as an author, to deter potential funders for fear of adverse publicity, and thus to threaten not only his livelihood but also the science he loves.

To eliminate paper use, we are only accepting completed certificates online.

Only then is the paper considered «accepted.»

Peer review is only ever meant to offer a certain level of scrutiny of a paper, ensuring that accepted standards are maintained.

Consider that they will not accept dissenting opinion and also consider that they not only accept but embrace the Mann papers.

But in any case peer - review is only the first stage in a paper becoming widely accepted — after it is published people will consider its conclusions, methodology etc. and if they think it wrong there are, as I said, mechanisms for challenging it in the peer - reviewed press.

It did leave them with the embarrassing problem that a paper that was allegedly accepted in March 2006 relied upon another paper that even the journal itself said was only received until August (and in reality, is was even later than that) Readers should note that this matters because unless the paper was accepted by the journal by the deadline, it should not have been accepted by IPCC for inclusion in the Fourth Assessment Report.

As I read it, three reviewers were said to have been «skeptically biased» by Wagner with no stated reasons other than it is the only explanation for how the paper was accepted even though curiously he also states:

In response, Johnson said the company «remains committed» to the goal and repeated Starbucks» claim that the cup is recyclable, despite paper cups only being accepted for recycling in four major cities in the U.S., with no public information about how many cups actually make it through the recycling process and are repurposed.

Then of those, only a small subset, just 77 who had been successful in getting more than half of their papers recently accepted by peer - reviewed climate science journals, were considered in their survey statistic.

I find it odd that you seem to be uncritically accepting the work of M&W, in fact defending it, when people who actually work in this field have, after only a short perusal of the paper, found it to have many problems.

Therefore, the Paper advocates a radical reframing — an inverting — of approach: accepting that decarbonisation will only be achieved successfully as a benefit contingent upon other goals which are politically attractive and relentlessly pragmatic.

It was only with the widely cited publication of a landmark paper, Meinshausen et al. (2009), that 2 °C risk probabilities were systematized in a widely accepted manner.

But it only urged you to read the primary literature (including the Munich Re paper) before accepting Muller's pronouncements, or what Bishop Hill said (or what Pielke selectively quotes).

There is a paper for the UK House of Lords accepted as evidence here which quantifies this at the macro level BUT only has science facts, I'm afraid, so there is no science to debate in it.: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1976309/THE%20ECONOMIC%20IMPACT%20OF%20SCIENCE%20DENIAL%20IN%20ENERGY%20POLICY.doc.pdf

Personal friends reviewing papers to ensure only the «right message» makes it into the accepted literature?

Or, he could have kept quiet and issued his press release only after the paper has been finished (after review) and accepted.

The journal's editorial board issued a public call for papers and personally solicited prospective authors to contribute, but «only a few authors accepted the invitation to be part of this volume.»

The government had accepted that the result of the referendum did not itself provide the source of a power to give the notice, because it was only «advisory», even though neither the Act nor the ballot paper said any such thing.

The committee will accept only one paper per author.

The Ontario Legislature ONLY accepts ORIGINAL petitions, on paper, with «hand signed» signatures.

Most carriers accept paper checks, while some allow bank drafts (but only if you're paying monthly), and some allow you to use a credit card only on your first premium payment.

Only wallets that have the «import private key» feature will be able to accept the transfer from your paper wallet.

The only paper he uses for the transaction is the Agreement of Purchase and Sale, but when expected regulation changes in Ontario come into place next year and electronic signatures are accepted, more trees will be saved, he says.