We emphasize that we do not decide that a state «mandated statement violates the Constitution simply because it disclaims any intent to communicate to students that the theory of evolution is
the only accepted explanation of the origin of life, informs students of their right to follow their religious principles, and encourages students to evaluate all explanations of life's origins, including those taught outside the classroom.
Not exact matches
There can be little question that Whitehead himself
accepted this; he believed that the tenderness, sympathy, and love which were shown in Jesus» life and death are in fact the disclosure of the nature of the Divine Reality who is the chief — although not the
only — principle of
explanation for all that has been, is, and will be.
Rather, the problem is to get them to reject irrational and supernatural
explanations of the world, the demons that exist
only in their imaginations, and to
accept a social and intellectual apparatus, Science, as the
only begetter of truth.»
As difficult and humbling as it may be to
accept, the
only explanation for all the energy and matter that has been formed into the overwhelming order and design in the natural world, is a Master Designer with unlimited power, intellect, wisdom.
The problem is to get [people] to reject irrational and supernatural
explanations of the world, the demons that exist
only in their imaginations, and to
accept a social and intellectual apparatus, Science, as the
only begetter of truth.
Richard Lewontin, a Harvard geneticist: «The problem is to get [people] to reject irrational and supernatural
explanations of the world, the demons that exist
only in their imaginations, and to
accept a social and intellectual apparatus, Science, as the
only begetter of truth.»
He
only tentatively
accepted my
explanation that in nonliterary circles she was known as Mrs. Hubert Stuart Moore, the wife of a London barrister.
The
only real difference between views 2 - 4 is how they arrive at an
explanation for why we just need to
accept what the Bible says and move on.
Related to the litmus test comments — How about this litmus test: if you don't
accept evolution as the
only rational
explanation for the diversity of life on Earth you can not run for office.
We, as a species... we humanity learned most of what we learned throughout human history
only AFTER refusing to
accept the old - time
explanation «because [insert name of local deity or other spirit, etc.] decreed it should be so.»
This precision in fitting the
explanation to the evidence should be carried over into philosophy: «The
only explanation we should
accept as satisfactory is one which fits tightly to its object with no space between them, no crevice in which any other
explanation might equally well be lodged; one which fits the object
only and to which alone the object lends itself» (CM 11).
The feelings that my body was dirty, that it was not mine, that it was
only for someone else to use, to decide if I was pretty, too fat, too thin, too plain, too made - up, too shy, too bold, too
accepting, too melodramatic, too obedient, too defiant... you get the idea, that all never went away, I was just lacking
explanation for much of it for a long time.
His
only explanation for my blindness was ideological blinkers, in effect a deep unwillingness to
accept that my life as I liked it had irreparably changed, common in middle - aged white men, and that I had changed it through my over-consumption and gas emissions.
As I read it, three reviewers were said to have been «skeptically biased» by Wagner with no stated reasons other than it is the
only explanation for how the paper was
accepted even though curiously he also states:
Temperature drops with elevation by less than 1 degree per 100 m.
Accepting the temperature
explanation would imply that trees at the tree - line * are * limited, while trees 150 m below the tree - line (that experience temperatures by
only about 1 deg C higher than the treeline) are totally not.
Findings in this heavily litigated area are often predicated on erroneous clinical assumptions such as: that doctors
accept uncritically and at face value what the client says about their history (HE (DRC — credibility and psychiatric reports) Democratic Republic of Congo [2004] UKIAT 00321); that
only psychiatrists can diagnose conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (HH (Ethiopia) v SSHD [2007] EWCA Civ 306, [2007] All ER (D) 259 (Mar)-RRB-; and that doctors do not consider alternative
explanations, including fabrication when, in fact, this is integrated into medical training and has always been a specified requirement of the IP (para 105 (f)-RRB-.
I
only ask because certain banks are refusing to reverse the transaction and aren't
accepting the R10
explanation, like my own (Chase).
Dwelling Quest Corp. v. Greater New York Savings Bank (246 A.D. 2d 431)-- broker fails to establish commission entitlement where unsigned writing prepared by broker stating that its commission shall
only be due if its prospect completes and closes the transaction, while not constituting the parties» agreement, is deemed to be conclusive evidence of such agreement in the absence of credible
explanation why broker sent such a writing if it did not reflect the parties» agreement; moreover, owners ultimately
accepted all cash offer from party not presented by broker.