The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam
the only accepted religion on earth.»
Judge made the biggest mistake of his life to let that mosque to be built.and problem is that people will pay heavily for that decision.Islam is the source of problem, Koran is the source problem.They use our freedom of religion, they sneak in cities under the name of peace and love then they strike hard, though other religions have no rights in their contries.Here is statement from Omar Ahmed chairman of the Board of council on America Islamic Relation:» Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant.The Quran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam
the only accepted religion on earth «Does this sounds to you religionf peace, love and logic?or terrorist thresd for thr future?
The Koran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam
the only accepted religion on Earth.»
Because without their steadfast support of freedom of speech and religion, you run the risk of ending up in a theocracy that
only accepts a religion other than your own.
Not exact matches
Love «is now the West's undeclared
religion — and perhaps its
only generally
accepted religion,» he writes.
I personally ping - ponged back and forth between
religion and non-
religion for a long time before
accepting that we humans are truly
only guessing at things, and likely inventing things, that are impossible to know for sure.
The
only way to find compatibility in such a worldview is by
accepting a
religion with no authority on the most meaningful matters of human existence.»
I am neither a christian or muslim but what right do christians have in making fun of muslims and their books when so much trash exists in their houses
only difference being that other
religions are open about their practices and even
accept their mistakes..
After 3 months of searching the internet and you tube to decide if I wanted to come back to
religion, I finally found someone who preaches from the heart, the way my Mama and Papa used to hear when they went to church, DR John Collins with the Church of Biblical Christians tells it the way it should be plus he does not
accept donations, He preaches against todays prosperity preachers, My Papa said hes the
only guy he has heard of lately not affraid to tell you what he thinks and use scripture to back him up.
xx4zu1 - «the point that was made is that
religion is the
only thing that is given to you, in most cases, at birth that you can chose not to
accept.»
Wall off a piece of land and build a room with a thatched roof...» (Malfoozat Vol 2, p. 42) «Jamaat» is a form of jihad (today's word is Terrorism) against all other
religions not following Islam or
accepting Islam as the
only true
religion.
Not
only would a demonstration of the inconsistency of divine relativity make Hartshorne's thesis of divine relativity and all that depends on it incoherent and also make Whitehead's famous portrait of God as the fellow sufferer who understands inadmissible, but philosophers of
religion would have to
accept a different picture of the world.
Christianity's Christ is not in either other
religions mainly because the jews
only accept the first five books of the bible.
Yet he does not
accept Barth's claim that all non-Christian
religions are
only idolatrous strivings after God.
As Collins and Miller illustrate, there are those who
accept a divine supernatural realm and methodological naturalism (as opposed to metaphysical naturalism); but because
religion is introduced long before science education, your «brainwashing...
only ways» statement and your subsequent tu quoque are both faulty.
Azariah who later became Bishop of Dornakal argued that the church in
accepting the position of a communal political minority with special protection would become a static community and it would negate its self - understanding as standing for mission and service to the whole national community, that in any case the Indian church is not a single social or cultural community since it consists of people of diverse background, each of whom would have its own political struggle to wage in cooperation with the people of similar background in other
religions; and therefore theologically and politically Christians should ask
only for religious freedom for its mission and service to all people, not as a minority right, but as a human right (ref.
It is
only the good acts and deeds of a muslim should guide people to
accept the
religion.
Actually, if the idiots in Iran would just stop and understand their own
religion, It tells them that this is a
religion for those who choose to
accept and you are
only a Muslim if you have the faith in your heart.
Once you accustom yourself to
accepting invisible magical forces to explain things, it's
only a matter of time before you are ensnared by some
religion.
Notwithstanding all that archeology has done for us, and the careful reconsideration of
accepted positions in study of the Pentateuch, it still remains that as historic source material the Pentateuch is at its best
only hazy - and we have no other for the
religion of Moses, except such light as subsequent events can reflect upon it.
You also believe that anyone that is not a mormon will NOT be allow to be with Jesus Christ or God, no matter how good they are, if they do not
accept your gospel (
religion) to be the
only true church.
The best and
only way is to present our
religion as best we can and let the person chose for themselves if they will
accept it.
Is the church composed
only of those who call themselves Christians, or followers of Jesus, and who
accept a certain dogma; or does it consist of those who dwell in the Spirit, by whatever
religion or label they identify themselves, those who live according to the principle of love for one's fellow man, and of recognizing the holy spirit within each?
You say that, seeking a religious faith which you can honestly
accept, you have been exploring Christianity
only, and you ask whether in all fairness you ought not to explore the other
religions also before you make up your mind.
One of the differences between science and
religion is that a scientist is willing to change his understanding of the world in the face of new facts while a religious believer
accepts only facts that support his beliefs.
It is precisely when the dark side of life is
accepted that possibilities of new experience begin to open up — not
only in ethics but also in
religion.
Having put that forth, in my experience and knowledge, mormonism was considered a cult by all the christian literature available to me through the 70's and 80's and
only recently ihave I noticed that mormonism is being a more
accepted as a normal mainstream
religion.
Our plea would be that from now on any study of externalia recognize itself as such; that
only those deserve to be
accepted as studies of
religion that do justice to the fact that they deal with the life of men.
«9 Correlatively, Smith observes the word «
religions» (plural form) comes into use
only as one «contemplates from the outside, and abstracts, depersonalizes, and reifies the various systems of other people of which one does not oneself see the meaning or appreciate the point, let alone
accept the validity.
You can
only break the cycle by stopping the abuse and admit to yourself that your parents weren't right about everything and
accept they make mistakes, even one so large and egregious as a false
religion.
And they did not do a Reformation, for they
only added to the dysfunction of organized
religion by
accepting the «prophecies» of a drunk, womanizing, snake - oil salesman, and con - artist who was murdered in Nauvoo, Illinois.
Only if you
accept claims at face value, which is what
religion usually does.
The Islam
religion believes in the Qu «ran and the teachings of Muhammad, they also don't
accept Jesus as God's son, they
accept him as a prophet and good man
only.
Clearly alarmed by the religious instruction that would occur at religious schools — «not
only is the risk of
religion intruding into the secular educational function great, that risk is inevitable and unavoidable due to the very structure of the Scholarship Program» — Judge Martinez
accepted nearly all of the ACLU's claims.
(The Tribunal
accepted that it could insist on its morals if it provided service
only to members of the particular religious belief, or if its purpose was to give instruction in its
religion — the reason why Catholic schools can fire teachers who divorce.)
This is particularly relevant to candidates from outside the U.S. where it may not
only be
accepted, but expected to include information about nationality, age,
religion, and other protected classes.