A skeptic will
only accept a claim given sufficient evidence, but a denier will cling to their beliefs regardless of evidence.
It only accepts the claim if the car also damages and the liability is restricted to 50 % of the replacement cost.
In Ontario, Realtors can also file a claim through their commission protection insurance, but Schlotzhauer cautions that the insurance
only accepts claims where commissions are owed but the broker is either unable or unwilling to pay.
Not exact matches
According to Creditcards.com, while
only 25 percent of U.S. debit cards are currently chip - equipped, and an estimated 12 million point - of - sale terminals still need to be upgraded to support EMV, small businesses
accepting antiquated swipe and sign payments are «held 100 % liable for
claims of fraud or wrong - doing» according to Finance Magnets.
The splash page you end up at through its Google search ad also plays with high - pressure sales tactics like
claiming the «offer ends in 3 days» and «
accepting only 8 more Canadians today!»
The statement goes on to label the public vilification it has faced since a joint Guardian and Channel 4 exposé in March as based on «unfounded accusations,»
claiming their activities are not
only legal but also «widely
accepted as a standard component of online advertising.»
outside of the bible, or any other religious texts (which, again, are
only relevant to those
accept the
claimed authority) do you see any evidence of heaven, hell, sin, or redemption?
Most Christians don't understand how others might see it as hate when they make the
claim that their heaven & heII exists and that those not invited to heaven are going to go to heII to be tormented and tortured for eternity and the
only way to salvation is to
accept their God as your Lord and Savior... They think to themselves that they are just trying to help by condemning those they dislike and who don't worship the same way they do, but that doesn't change it from what it is, «hate filled».
I think David believes that God
accepts jokes... he's the
only ex-pastor who
claims to stand naked before God...
where an ideology or belief
claims «certainty» but
only through
accepting that belief can one know «true» knowledge.
I started
accepting the label «atheist» when I realized it doesn't necessarily mean that at all, and also when I realized not
only that the God
claim could not be demonstrated, but also that there are sound reasons for doubting it.
My
only claim is that there is nothing in Whiteheadian theism that is fundamentally in conflict with the deepest and most widely
accepted Buddhist insights.
Your
claim of growing up is really
only being seperated from God thru whatever reasoning prevents you from
accepting his love.
They
claim 3,000 youngsters should be helped and
claim Home Secretary Amber Rudd's decision
only 480 should be
accepted is «fundamentally flawed».
But (2) the
only reason given for
accepting the objective
claim of CE as true is that in CE they seem to be true; the
only reason for
accepting that the subject knows that causes are operating in the way they appear to be is that it believes with strong conviction that they are.
only God can forgive sins... He made many other
claims of deity, proving them and
accepting worship!
I have a thought for your kind consideration: If you really believe that each person should be accountable for his deeds
ONLY, then by the same logic, you must
accept the fact that it is gross injustice to
claim that Jesus took everyones sins on his shoulders.
Yet he does not
accept Barth's
claim that all non-Christian religions are
only idolatrous strivings after God.
He
claimed things that were considered to be Blasphemy according to Jewish law when he said the Father and I are One and before Abraham was «I Am» He was
claiming that He was the «Great I AM» of the Old testament, now come in the flesh and came to pay the price of sin for man, the
only acceptable perfect sacrifice, the lamb wihtout blemish, that God would
accept because he was indeed God in flesh.
This
only deepened the questions growing in his own mind, questions about a multitude of
claims he had always
accepted about the Bible, history and the future.
Hume's
claim that logical and real possibility are distinguished
only by a habit of the mind (we are not in the habit of seeing billiard balls vanish when struck by other billiard balls, so we do not think that is a «real» possibility) is not universally
accepted.
The contemporary NEED to be tolerant and not the traditional usage of the word (
accepting that someone else's view be heard) we have a new definition which is framed as being
only able to say that their
claim is as valid as any other.
I consider «cult logic» to be where a certain ideology or belief
claims certainty and
only through
accepting that belief can one know «true» knowledge.
============== Faith has essentially two
accepted usages in the English language; atheists In this case discard «A» over «B», then attack Christians in that context
only, making a further critical and purposeful redefinition of the word «faith»,
claiming that proof obviates it.
Specifically, I have ventured to challenge both of the simplifications whereby the problem before us is most commonly rendered incapable of solution — namely, the simplifications that one can be truly secular
only by
accepting modern secularism and that one can believe in God
only by
accepting the
claims of classical theism.
From âpihtawikosisân: The Canadian government continues to mouth platitudes about its supposed dedication to this relationship, while it slashes funding, ignores our emergencies, pulls out of comprehensive land
claim discussions, «consults» with us and then ignores everything we told them, all while pursuing a hard - line agenda which
accepts only termination as a result.
If the majority of society put half of the effort into developing their intellect and forming their own beliefs that many put into living a life controlled by what any random man who
claims they are spreading God's message, perhaps people would actually come to their own conclusions rather than simply
accepting the ones presented to them as the one and
only truth.
I had to learn to look beyond smiling faces, empty rhetoric, to asking myself why those who want to get very close very quickly or those who say one thing like
claiming no strict rules about becoming a full
accepted member somewhere
only later on to start hearing of expectations and the guilt tripping brain - washing used.
Only if you
accept claims at face value, which is what religion usually does.
Sport have continued to link Lenglet with a move to the Nou Camp, with the 22 - year - old having a $ 30m release clause in his contract, but it's
claimed that he will
only accept a move to Barcelona or another club if he has guarantees of being a regular starter.
The faux «loyalty» that Wenger
claims, in humbug style, to show, is
ONLY to his own power, salary and his inability to do anything else outside football, which at 68, most people of his age have to
accept.
In truth either we have four there but I'm sure will
only accept the two and
claim they aren't good enough.
It not
only revealed that formula companies were out for the bottom line and apparently had no concern for the infants they were
claiming to nourish, but also led morally driven scientists and social activists to question the formula -
accepting status quo.
If it looks like Cameron will win overall, Labour will take a pasting in Scotland because people will not
accept the old
claims of «
only Labour can protect you from the Tories».
I think it's
only very slowly — and I don't even want to
claim we've won the argument completely yet — that neuroscientists have begun to
accept that there is, at least in animals, a purely spatial function for the hippocampus and that in addition to its preserved spatial function, this could form the basis for an episodic memory system in humans.
Clearly alarmed by the religious instruction that would occur at religious schools — «not
only is the risk of religion intruding into the secular educational function great, that risk is inevitable and unavoidable due to the very structure of the Scholarship Program» — Judge Martinez
accepted nearly all of the ACLU's
claims.
And even if one were to
accept RAND's
claim to validity by virtue of its match with the results of another study, this
claim applies
only to the class - size findings.
Malloy
claims that his «initiative» is providing Connecticut's 30 most struggling school districts with another $ 132 million in state aid, but the truth is that this year's increase is
only about $ 45 million and that in order to get those funds, school districts were required to
accept a series of new mandates and programs aimed at further implementing Malloy's corporate education reform agenda and diverting scarce public dollars to private companies.
New York City
claimed it did not segregate its projects, but Woodside and similar complexes in white neighborhoods
accepted only a token few black tenants because Housing Authority policy was to respect «existing community patterns.»
I had to file a Freedom of Information request in order to get a copy of the paperwork on the Gates grant and what I received was
only the partial information, because as Connecticut taxpayers will have learned from the Jumoke / FUSE fiasco, while charter schools consistently argue they are «public» when it comes to
accepting money from the state, they are quick to
claim that they are private institutions when it comes to transparency and accountability.
The candidate who falsely
claimed that the state budget was balanced and that, if re-elected, he wouldn't make cuts to social services or raise taxes is now instructing his Democratic colleagues in the State Senate and State House of Representatives that not
only must they make historic cuts to vital health and human services, while raising tax on the middle class, but that he will
only accept a budget that includes funding for two new charter schools while the new budget cuts funding for the state's public schools.
Chrysler Group («new Chrysler») purchased many of Old Carco's («old Chrysler») assets on June 10, but initially decided
only to
accept liability
claims filed with the new company — leaving anyone with
claims filed before that date to fight for a piece of the old organization.
Additionally, «we» or «us» shall mean any third party providing benefits, services, or products in connection with the Account (including but not limited to credit reporting agencies, merchants that
accept any credit device issued under the Account, rewards programs and enrollment services, credit insurance companies, debt collectors, and all of their officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives) if, and
only if, such a third party is named by you as a co-defendant in any
Claim you assert against us.
In some cases, companies
claim to
accept Skrill, but
only accept card payments through Skrill's payment gateway.
Would you have
accepted that you could
only claim a loss of $ 10,000?
Online quotes are estimates
only, based on information you provide, and are subject to change based on verification of information, including identification of the property or risk to be insured,
claim and credit history, and / or information contained on other consumer reports.Receipt of an online insurance quote does not guarantee that your application will be
accepted should you apply for insurance.
Claims for missing GC Award Points on Qualifying Room Rate and Qualifying Incidental Charges are
only accepted when the Member's preference of GC Award Points is selected prior to check - out at the hotel.
Claims for missing Airline Miles from eligible stays on non-discounted or corporate rates are
only accepted when the preference of Airline Miles is selected prior to check - out at the hotel.
But the real kicker is that seemingly almost everyone who did not receive and
accept a contract offer was hit with a copyright
claim upon uploading any gameplay footage of Shadow of Mordor, thus ensuring that the
only videos available, aside from reviews, were strictly controlled and painted the game in a positive light.
The scientific (i.e. «apolitical») approach to criticising the idea of sustainability can
only go so far, and almost has to
accept that, if the «science» relating to some
claim about an unsustainable activity is right, then the sustainable agenda more broadly is right.