Sentences with phrase «only accepts the claim»

A skeptic will only accept a claim given sufficient evidence, but a denier will cling to their beliefs regardless of evidence.
It only accepts the claim if the car also damages and the liability is restricted to 50 % of the replacement cost.
In Ontario, Realtors can also file a claim through their commission protection insurance, but Schlotzhauer cautions that the insurance only accepts claims where commissions are owed but the broker is either unable or unwilling to pay.

Not exact matches

According to Creditcards.com, while only 25 percent of U.S. debit cards are currently chip - equipped, and an estimated 12 million point - of - sale terminals still need to be upgraded to support EMV, small businesses accepting antiquated swipe and sign payments are «held 100 % liable for claims of fraud or wrong - doing» according to Finance Magnets.
The splash page you end up at through its Google search ad also plays with high - pressure sales tactics like claiming the «offer ends in 3 days» and «accepting only 8 more Canadians today!»
The statement goes on to label the public vilification it has faced since a joint Guardian and Channel 4 exposé in March as based on «unfounded accusations,» claiming their activities are not only legal but also «widely accepted as a standard component of online advertising.»
outside of the bible, or any other religious texts (which, again, are only relevant to those accept the claimed authority) do you see any evidence of heaven, hell, sin, or redemption?
Most Christians don't understand how others might see it as hate when they make the claim that their heaven & heII exists and that those not invited to heaven are going to go to heII to be tormented and tortured for eternity and the only way to salvation is to accept their God as your Lord and Savior... They think to themselves that they are just trying to help by condemning those they dislike and who don't worship the same way they do, but that doesn't change it from what it is, «hate filled».
I think David believes that God accepts jokes... he's the only ex-pastor who claims to stand naked before God...
where an ideology or belief claims «certainty» but only through accepting that belief can one know «true» knowledge.
I started accepting the label «atheist» when I realized it doesn't necessarily mean that at all, and also when I realized not only that the God claim could not be demonstrated, but also that there are sound reasons for doubting it.
My only claim is that there is nothing in Whiteheadian theism that is fundamentally in conflict with the deepest and most widely accepted Buddhist insights.
Your claim of growing up is really only being seperated from God thru whatever reasoning prevents you from accepting his love.
They claim 3,000 youngsters should be helped and claim Home Secretary Amber Rudd's decision only 480 should be accepted is «fundamentally flawed».
But (2) the only reason given for accepting the objective claim of CE as true is that in CE they seem to be true; the only reason for accepting that the subject knows that causes are operating in the way they appear to be is that it believes with strong conviction that they are.
only God can forgive sins... He made many other claims of deity, proving them and accepting worship!
I have a thought for your kind consideration: If you really believe that each person should be accountable for his deeds ONLY, then by the same logic, you must accept the fact that it is gross injustice to claim that Jesus took everyones sins on his shoulders.
Yet he does not accept Barth's claim that all non-Christian religions are only idolatrous strivings after God.
He claimed things that were considered to be Blasphemy according to Jewish law when he said the Father and I are One and before Abraham was «I Am» He was claiming that He was the «Great I AM» of the Old testament, now come in the flesh and came to pay the price of sin for man, the only acceptable perfect sacrifice, the lamb wihtout blemish, that God would accept because he was indeed God in flesh.
This only deepened the questions growing in his own mind, questions about a multitude of claims he had always accepted about the Bible, history and the future.
Hume's claim that logical and real possibility are distinguished only by a habit of the mind (we are not in the habit of seeing billiard balls vanish when struck by other billiard balls, so we do not think that is a «real» possibility) is not universally accepted.
The contemporary NEED to be tolerant and not the traditional usage of the word (accepting that someone else's view be heard) we have a new definition which is framed as being only able to say that their claim is as valid as any other.
I consider «cult logic» to be where a certain ideology or belief claims certainty and only through accepting that belief can one know «true» knowledge.
============== Faith has essentially two accepted usages in the English language; atheists In this case discard «A» over «B», then attack Christians in that context only, making a further critical and purposeful redefinition of the word «faith», claiming that proof obviates it.
Specifically, I have ventured to challenge both of the simplifications whereby the problem before us is most commonly rendered incapable of solution — namely, the simplifications that one can be truly secular only by accepting modern secularism and that one can believe in God only by accepting the claims of classical theism.
From âpihtawikosisân: The Canadian government continues to mouth platitudes about its supposed dedication to this relationship, while it slashes funding, ignores our emergencies, pulls out of comprehensive land claim discussions, «consults» with us and then ignores everything we told them, all while pursuing a hard - line agenda which accepts only termination as a result.
If the majority of society put half of the effort into developing their intellect and forming their own beliefs that many put into living a life controlled by what any random man who claims they are spreading God's message, perhaps people would actually come to their own conclusions rather than simply accepting the ones presented to them as the one and only truth.
I had to learn to look beyond smiling faces, empty rhetoric, to asking myself why those who want to get very close very quickly or those who say one thing like claiming no strict rules about becoming a full accepted member somewhere only later on to start hearing of expectations and the guilt tripping brain - washing used.
Only if you accept claims at face value, which is what religion usually does.
Sport have continued to link Lenglet with a move to the Nou Camp, with the 22 - year - old having a $ 30m release clause in his contract, but it's claimed that he will only accept a move to Barcelona or another club if he has guarantees of being a regular starter.
The faux «loyalty» that Wenger claims, in humbug style, to show, is ONLY to his own power, salary and his inability to do anything else outside football, which at 68, most people of his age have to accept.
In truth either we have four there but I'm sure will only accept the two and claim they aren't good enough.
It not only revealed that formula companies were out for the bottom line and apparently had no concern for the infants they were claiming to nourish, but also led morally driven scientists and social activists to question the formula - accepting status quo.
If it looks like Cameron will win overall, Labour will take a pasting in Scotland because people will not accept the old claims of «only Labour can protect you from the Tories».
I think it's only very slowly — and I don't even want to claim we've won the argument completely yet — that neuroscientists have begun to accept that there is, at least in animals, a purely spatial function for the hippocampus and that in addition to its preserved spatial function, this could form the basis for an episodic memory system in humans.
Clearly alarmed by the religious instruction that would occur at religious schools — «not only is the risk of religion intruding into the secular educational function great, that risk is inevitable and unavoidable due to the very structure of the Scholarship Program» — Judge Martinez accepted nearly all of the ACLU's claims.
And even if one were to accept RAND's claim to validity by virtue of its match with the results of another study, this claim applies only to the class - size findings.
Malloy claims that his «initiative» is providing Connecticut's 30 most struggling school districts with another $ 132 million in state aid, but the truth is that this year's increase is only about $ 45 million and that in order to get those funds, school districts were required to accept a series of new mandates and programs aimed at further implementing Malloy's corporate education reform agenda and diverting scarce public dollars to private companies.
New York City claimed it did not segregate its projects, but Woodside and similar complexes in white neighborhoods accepted only a token few black tenants because Housing Authority policy was to respect «existing community patterns.»
I had to file a Freedom of Information request in order to get a copy of the paperwork on the Gates grant and what I received was only the partial information, because as Connecticut taxpayers will have learned from the Jumoke / FUSE fiasco, while charter schools consistently argue they are «public» when it comes to accepting money from the state, they are quick to claim that they are private institutions when it comes to transparency and accountability.
The candidate who falsely claimed that the state budget was balanced and that, if re-elected, he wouldn't make cuts to social services or raise taxes is now instructing his Democratic colleagues in the State Senate and State House of Representatives that not only must they make historic cuts to vital health and human services, while raising tax on the middle class, but that he will only accept a budget that includes funding for two new charter schools while the new budget cuts funding for the state's public schools.
Chrysler Group («new Chrysler») purchased many of Old Carco's («old Chrysler») assets on June 10, but initially decided only to accept liability claims filed with the new company — leaving anyone with claims filed before that date to fight for a piece of the old organization.
Additionally, «we» or «us» shall mean any third party providing benefits, services, or products in connection with the Account (including but not limited to credit reporting agencies, merchants that accept any credit device issued under the Account, rewards programs and enrollment services, credit insurance companies, debt collectors, and all of their officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives) if, and only if, such a third party is named by you as a co-defendant in any Claim you assert against us.
In some cases, companies claim to accept Skrill, but only accept card payments through Skrill's payment gateway.
Would you have accepted that you could only claim a loss of $ 10,000?
Online quotes are estimates only, based on information you provide, and are subject to change based on verification of information, including identification of the property or risk to be insured, claim and credit history, and / or information contained on other consumer reports.Receipt of an online insurance quote does not guarantee that your application will be accepted should you apply for insurance.
Claims for missing GC Award Points on Qualifying Room Rate and Qualifying Incidental Charges are only accepted when the Member's preference of GC Award Points is selected prior to check - out at the hotel.
Claims for missing Airline Miles from eligible stays on non-discounted or corporate rates are only accepted when the preference of Airline Miles is selected prior to check - out at the hotel.
But the real kicker is that seemingly almost everyone who did not receive and accept a contract offer was hit with a copyright claim upon uploading any gameplay footage of Shadow of Mordor, thus ensuring that the only videos available, aside from reviews, were strictly controlled and painted the game in a positive light.
The scientific (i.e. «apolitical») approach to criticising the idea of sustainability can only go so far, and almost has to accept that, if the «science» relating to some claim about an unsustainable activity is right, then the sustainable agenda more broadly is right.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z