Offsetting emissions
only achieves carbon neutrality if the investments trigger emission reductions that would not have happened anyway.
Not exact matches
«Cutting trees for fuel is antithetical to the important role that forests play as a sink for CO2 that might otherwise accumulate in the atmosphere,» Schlesinger writes in an article published yesterday in the journal Science, adding later that
carbon neutrality «is
only achieved» if harvested forests are allowed to regrow more biomass than was lost.
It is the fastest way to
achieve emissions reductions and the
only way to
achieve carbon neutrality.
And if you want to
achieve climate
neutrality, offsetting the
carbon emissions you can't reduce is currently the
only way to do so.
I could believe that 10 % of GDP is an upper bound even in this case, because
achieving carbon neutrality basically requires a big change to infrastructure but one that
only has to be performed once (though it may take years to complete).