Sentences with phrase «only after argument»

But as I said, I've changed my mind not only after argument but after conference and after starting to write an opinion.

Not exact matches

The argument has been made that the copy protection that is rampant in ebooks is stunting the market — MP3 sales only really took off after Apple removed digital rights management restrictions, after all.

[109][110][111] Corzine later wrote that only after the proposal was released did he discover «the harsh reality: the public intensely disliked the idea» and that, in retrospect, he «should have pressed harder to identify the most salient arguments against the plan and developed a strategy to get in front of and respond to those challenges.»

Out of all the postings on this site today, I found «Derp's «post the most fascinating and informative, as well as deeply revealing.Even after boasting of what seems to be a practically perfect live by any measure, he informs us that he takes pleasure in mocking and ridiculing those of faith who are presumably his opposite; I can only wonder if, given all his supposed accomplishments, he is smart enough to realize how deeply revealing of his true character his remarks are.As a believer, I rarely engage in arguments with my atheist friends, and like to think I wouldn't lower myself to the level of juvenile name - calling and personal attacks against whatever my atheist friends hold dear.Most of the time we simply agree to disagree; when they hold forth with misinformation or ignorance on their assumed «knowledge «of my faith, I try to gently correct them; I certainly don't allow any disagreements we have to devolve into hateful insults and name - calling.

Such arguments will occupy a central position in the overall natural and Catholic approach, this article included, but only after a compassionate pastoral approach has laid the proper foundation.

To many, it has seemed an unedifying sight that those who defend theism on cosmological grounds have time after time given up their arguments only to come back with new ones which in turn are later surrendered.

After all, you only need to answer arguments when there is a genuine balance of power.

I want with all my heart for this to happen to us in the Presbyterian Church — that we take up our arguments about the issues that divide only after we have knelt and laid our individual and collective burdens of sin at the foot of the cross.

Has it not often happened that the well is first covered only after the child has fallen in, while before this the most reasonable arguments and warnings had been of no avail?

... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself.

In fact, this may quite possibly be his only line of argument, the other apparent one not really being intended as such after all.

The alleged «silence» about the virgin birth from other New Testament authors can not be used as an argument against it since its factuality would have been revealed by Mary only after the resurrection and it did not constitute the centre of the Easter message; Redford even finds hints thatother New Testament authors framed their affirmations to allow for the virgin birth.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

Rational arguments on behalf of Christian claims become possible only after one has learned through spiritual training how to speak the language of Christian faith.

The argument says language was not of benefit in the present time of an evolving hominid thus it served no purpose then only future purpose after develepoment of arts etc. thousands of years later.

Your argument would only make sense if there was no prior evidence for such beliefs... but it's clearly there both before & after.

I have this argument with my dad everyday, I really don't care we are the fifth richest club in the world, football in my opinion is all about what happens on the pitch not in the accounting department, we as fans were sold a dream by the people at the top of our club including wenger that basically said after Ashburton grove was built we'd compete on the pitch with the best in Europe, guess what we haven't, the only thing we've done is make a rich American and his associates even richer, wenger has been a willing participant in this.

This from a commenter on The Villa Blog: «Martin O'Niell [sic] and John Carew had a stand up argument in the Dressing Room Area after MON told him he was only a substitute for the Wigan match.

Then a few years went by, and the sex diminished to once every two months, then three, then six, and then twice a year only after discussions, arguments, anger, and no response.

Clegg's argument was that the public was too stupid to understand that students would only pay back the fees after they started earning a certain amount.

After closing arguments yesterday, the jurors only deliberated for about a half hour.

Lawyer Kevin Keating said in closing arguments Wednesday that Mangano handled millions of dollars in contracts and that restaurateur Harendra Singh only benefited from one contract to feed first responders after Superstorm Sandy.

His intervention comes after the Prime Minister last week said that he would allow his ministers to campaign on either side of the argument ahead of the in - out referendum — but only once his renegotiation with Brussels is complete.

It's an argument that obviously can only be made after the final environmental review is published and the planning commission makes its decision.

But his attorneys released a statement last night fleshing out their argument about why a lawsuit was the only option after PNAS did not follow its own procedures and ignored Jacobson's requests to correct errors in the Clack study prior to publication.

One argument against this pattern is that your insulin only rises after you've eaten carbohydrates, and insulin is a strongly anabolic hormone.

His fame and prestige did nothing to quench his personal combustibility; notorious in cinematic circles as the only prominent director who ever actually shot a film critic, he later served six months of a four - and - a-half year sentence for manslaughter after killing a farm laborer during an argument.

It is a little rough around the edges and there is an argument to be made that the relative lack of directorial flair makes the film feel too conventional but those points are only really relevant when comparing it to Argento's later works, and after all, this was his first movie and there are plenty of filmmakers out there at the twilight of their careers who would love to make a thriller as tight and effective as this with everything available at their disposal, let alone the small budget and restrictions that Dario Argento had to work with.

After one too many arguments on this topic, she tearfully breaks up with him; she then embarks on a long period of workaholic mourning, which only ends when a drunken boor corners her at a bar and asks to have a drink with her.

Publishers getting 75 % of net after the book had been amortized and now only resides as digital signatures (hardly the warehousing argument of old), is unfair, very.

Create an introductory paragraph only after you have written a thesis statement and main arguments.

The only compelling argument I've read so far is that traditional publishers provide advances and bankroll the writing process, but that's typically only true after one has already sold some work: few are those who ever got offered great publishing deals on their first manuscript in the traditional system either.

I buy TLI's argument that adverse - selection means folk who knew they only had a short life - expectancy will not have sold their policies, (hence my analysis is over-pessimistic) but am surprised this effect still persists after 6 + years (no significant turn up in mortality - rates pa towards those appropriate for their age so far).

Arguments rage about whether we are in an auto - loan bubble now, and there is certainly some evidence suggesting that we are, but remember that you can only define a bubble after it has popped.

Because Xbox came out a week later, they are trying to create the impression that it is only because Xbox launched later that PS4 beat it in sells (A funny argument coming from the camp that boasted of having more sells with the 360 than a system that launched a whole year after it, but I digress.).

I wasn't aggressive, I wasn't a fanboy, and I actually used factual arguments to back up my claims, so why the disagree, unfortunately, I may not answer, as I can only post once more after to this, but I will read it, so come on, tell me what you disagreed with in my post.

Ascension is, after all, leagues better looking than its excellent cousin Samurai Gunn (available now on Steam, coming this year to PS4 and Vita) and is just as frantic, so that argument only goes so far.

Battling exhaustion and the flu on the Monday after the opening, Goldstein, sitting in the Stedelijk's popular restaurant with a cup of fresh mint tea, considered for a moment, then said, «If artists make arguments about what a work of art can do, and if artists give us an opportunity to have insights through their own eyes and words to culture we all share, I think Mike, in a most profound and almost impossibly comprehensive way, gave us not only a window [into] but in some ways a means to rethink art and to examine our relationship to our culture and our society.»

Especially as the competition between national schools of abstract painting escalated, breaking out in arguments and even punches in the case of Kline and the French painter Jean Fautrier, it would follow that the internal competition within these national schools also intensified.27 This was certainly true on the French side at the Venice Biennale: in a very unusual move, two artists — Fautrier and Hans Hartung — were awarded Grand Prizes in painting, whereas normally only one was given, because the jury could not decide between the two contenders.28 Within the context of the politics internal to the movement of abstract expressionism, Meryon could thus be seen as a reassertion of Kline's original, breakthrough style as his own and thus a defence of his personal artistic identity, after Kline himself had turned to colour, around 1955, and left it up for grabs.

But the argument that a cyclist is less likely to kill someone else is only valid up to a point - after all, unpredictable road users are a danger to everyone - and when I'm driving I would much rather know that the cyclist in front of me is sober and is unlikely to wobble into my path.

BUT, where the «green energy jobs» argument falls down is not only in the longevity of the full - time jobs available after installation, but in the fact that these jobs are a direct result of green central planning.

It is only propped up by the billions of vested interests in all derivatives of the CO2 scheme and now that post modern science has been unmasked for what it is - a pretext -, the true face of political activism, the social sciences in which you pulled your «denier» term, is showing up, eagerly expecting that after years of brainwashing, fear mongering, propaganda spewed on the masses through main stream media - often linked to vested green interests Thomson Reuters for instance -, that «action» will come thanks to uneducated zealots, incapable of understanding the science, eagerly parroting arguments of authority and willing to serve their new masters.

After carefull scrutiny he found out that the only legitimate arguments were to be found in the scientific literature - one way or the other.

After about three weeks starting mid February, 2006 of being what it was designed for, a convenient place for me to keep my standard arguments handy for sci.environment threads, and with only a trickle of visitors, I was outed by RealClimate and things really took off.

Half a year after the president's rejection, many of the arguments for expansion have been tempered not only by the realities of long term lower oil prices, but by the Keystone XL debate itself.

It pretty much backs up your argument that anthropogenic contribution could only have commenced after 1950.

People only do that after they realize the argument against plain AGW is lost.

The microscopic argument has already been made (that only self - selected high - energy molecules make it that high, and even after losing some PE, they STILL have the same averge KE left).

So far, AGW has only argued correlation as an argument, while not even including SEQUENCE since CO2 - increases clearly LAG temperature - hikes — which would be like saying that one BURPS after drinking cold soda, because the CO2 made their body - temperature higher, causing gas - bubbles..

But the approval came only after the operating committee had asked the advisers to omit the section that rebutted the contrarian arguments.