Sentences with phrase «only after talking»
Only after talking and...
https://www.meetsinglefirefighters.com/ Not exact matches
«One of the most effective ways we are able to add comfort and trust to the customer's experience is by constantly talking to our customers — not only before and after a purchase is made, but after the delivery is made as well,» Norman says.
In the movie Knocked Up under - achieving friends talk endlessly about creating a web site that will direct people to the «good parts» (meaning nudity) in every movie ever made only to find out after months of planning Mr. Skin had beat them to it.
But after the speech when everyone rushed the podium, I noticed something — everyone else only wanted to talk about her business, or worse, advice she'd have for their business.
«Miley Cyrus has only sustained her career by being polarizing and getting people to talk trash about her the day after a show, so in that regard the negative criticism isn't surprising, it was probably exactly what she expected and wanted,» he told Fortune.
I announced on Twitter yesterday after hearing Roger Ver's talk at the Satoshi's Vision Conference that the Bitcoin.com wallet would no longer create a default BTC wallet when downloaded, only a Bitcoin Cash wallet.
And no I didn't report it... you see, I hate talking on the phone and the only down side to Personal Capital has been that for about 2 weeks after I signed up I've had a financial advisor try to contact me to discuss my holdings, etc..
The only extraordinary thing about the tape, released over two months after the talk, is how long the union took to realize what a weapon it had in its hands.
After all, the New Testament itself only directly refers to emperors in a few places, even if they do seem to cast a long shadow over some of its proceedings, albeit from the wings, as in Acts (where, in the final chapters, Nero appears to be something like Godot, often talked about but never putting in an appearance).
Well guess what DallyDo, after reading only the first few lines of your paragraph it was easily discovered that you do not know what in the world you are talking about.
We are told only that Elisha «ran after Elijah,» kissed his parents, sacrificed to the Lord his yoke of oxen — talk about burning bridges — and «set out and followed Elijah, and became his servant» (1 Kings 19:21).
We can only talk at lunchtime, because she has to go home right after school with her older sister.
In a radio talk addressed to Germany after World War II, he called Christianity the most important unifying factor in Europe and said that only against the background of Christian faith does Western thought have any significance.
Because the National, Mandatory Sunday Law that is talked about in Revelation has not been passed yet in America and it is not yet being enforced by the United States worldwide... only after this happens... then the Time of Probation will close... and then beware everyone... stand by...
It is the ardent search for the new, powerful God - talk that Bonhoeffer yearned for, but thought would be forthcoming only after a period of necessary silence and renewal (at least in those quarters where Christianity was most acculturated and where the experience of the Holocaust and two World Wars shattered the confidence of both Western religious streams and alternative humanisms).
On the «soul sleep» kind of thing, I remember when I was about 19 or so talking to a physician, off duty, and saying that it must be terrible for someone in a coma to wake up after a long coma and somehow being aware of this long time where they only had their brain and no connection to the world.
As a result, when they read in Scripture what Jesus has to say about the Kingdom, they completely misunderstand what He was teaching because they think He was only talking about something that will affect us after we die.
Or some hear the gospel as a metaphorical message about how to live a better life in the here and now and view any talk of after - lives, eternal damnation, and saving as only metaphor that tends to get abused when it is used to stir up fear in order to get converts and tithing members.
Hi Sam Thank you for this post, I have something to share with you and I need help One week ago, I've meet a homeless he sleeps on the street, I woke him up, and told him that I'll buy food, he told me that he also wants cigarettes So I bought cigarettes, sandwich and a soft drink I gave him all these, and tried to talk with him; I asked if he is cold to bring him a cover, he said «No», he took cigarettes and said he do nt need food, he wants only to smoke and drink alcohol, after a minute I left and I heard him talking to the grocer and he told him to take food and to give him cigarettes and lighter in exchange!
And one of the strongest prophecies, IMHO, is Isaiah 66:7 - 8 which talks about Israel being born in one day with the «labor pains» (i.e.: war and struggles that normally come with becoming a nation) only occurring after the land has become a nation.
time for me to leave my country for 5 years study (medical field)... and while i am i that country (China) once i intercourse with a prostitute (i am really shamefull)... then after few times i found another girl in facebook (from my hometown only) then fall in love with her and that loves get stronger day by day (she is a christian) and i told her that im not virgin and i had this girlfriend and i did with prostitute so she forgives me and ask me to lie new life... but still i havent leave my e girl friend (i found difficult to leave her, i do nt love her much, but i do nt know how i love her in first place, she is much older than me), my ex gf came to suspects about my new relationship via facebooks post, comments, likes and all and sometimes i did told her that i have this new friend... as time passes by, she realised it and she do nt talk to me anymore till now... and last time i went home i met my new girl friend and we intercourse....
«Theology is after all only our way of talking about God.»
Some rejected all forms of life after death, including the possibility of resurrection; some recognized man's mortality but looked for a physical resurrection as man's only hope, and then only for some; for some the resurrection hope was to be understood more universally and in varying spiritual forms; some thought in terms of the immortality of the soul and then could dispense with resurrection talk altogether.
We can talk to modern man about the crisis in which he stands in rebellion against God only after the question of mythology has been solved.
but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!
Loraine you referred to passages just after the these ones that I have listed this is talking about the new covenant not only a Kingdom this is one of the Prophesies that Jesus has fulfilled in bringing a new covenant to Gods people.The people of God shall become numerous and prosperous.
After that start talking only about religion, God, cultural values, abortion, family values, «common man», and blame all the problems the country faces on liberals, Obama, France, Europe, the Chinese, outsourcing,... in short everyone else, except themselves.
And although my husband and I talked for years about sharing parenting responsibilities, he took only a few days off from work after each of our children was born.
He only talks to non-believers to call them to repentance and after a while if you don't accept Jesus he is a gentleman and he leaves you alone.
And if we now begin to talk of the sins of the others, after we have filled the world with torture, blood and corpses, with ruins and desolation, then I can only reply: All this is only an ounce compared with the terrible weight with which we have burdened our conscience.
ok, ok, ok, i get it both sides think they are telling the truth there are no lyers here on this blogs only misinform people talking about two separate subjects yet thinking they are talking about the same thing the existence of god... one side believe the other doesn't what's wrong with that... sooner or later they'll changed their minds and one side will believe and the other won't so the arguement will forever be the same about two separate aguement on the same blog... but its definitely entertaining to read the comebacks... keep up the good work you all... its just as fun to read what the believer have to say as to what the nonebeliever have to say... after all it keeps all getting to know eachother better on what we believe right???
In the meanwhile, it seems only fitting to share a recipe after all this culinary talk.
After a day spent making cakes of all sorts, it is only natural to talk to you about cake as well.
It was the first recipe my 4 year old claimed she loved after transitioning to a vegan only diet, and trust me she doesn't claim to «love» a lot of food unless we're talking about cakes.
I'm talking about a man who will cry happy tears just talking about my mom after 46 years of marriage, a man who touches the hearts of anyone he meets, and a man that can rock and roll deep into the wee hours of the morning, long after his only son has gone to bed.
Delirious after such an indulgent feast, I couldn't help but recall a bit of advice Boulud had mentioned when we first talked about this whole thing: «If you're only two people having a romantic picnic, you want to not bring too much food.
WTF are you talking about Leo I am only half way down and am after thumbing almost every comment down due to the complete opposite of what you said.
You only need to look at what happened last season after Gazidas talked about making some changes with a director being brought on board.
I mean look at carzola, he says outright without hiding that we need a striker... about finishing strongly, we did that last season and the season after and the other after after a first leg screw - up... maybe ramsey loves his friends in the dressing room but saying that we need a few quality wouldn't have hurt anyone... we weren't able to beat the chelsea that hez talking about at home even with a full squad so i don't get his reference plus other teams are strengthening strongly and will only get better... man utd with a mediocre team played us like we were some kids FH at OT and we had no injuries... IF WE DO NT SIGN STRIKER we are doomed cz it» l be harder to beat even the small teams
If you're talking about league table, we've only showed defensive stability after van Dijk came in, so that'll have to wait next season.
but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..
After all that, I just realized I only talked about the pass rush stuff.
Arsene Wenger may only want to talk about referees after any game nowadays, but in fact Arsenal simply can not win a game anyway and if Alvaro Morata had taken any of his chances Chelsea would have won this game in canter.
Yet Shaw has only made 15 appearances all season and is now again in the firing line as after he was berated by Mourinho from the sidelines in the first half against Brighton at the weekend, he was hauled off at half time and has now been a major talking point.
Newcastle United winger Hatem Ben Arfa has agreed a return to Ligue 1 «in principle» after talks with divisional strugglers OGC Nice, report the Telegraph, but the deal will only go through if the Magpies do not demand a transfer fee for a player whose relationship with the club seems to be at breaking point.
«Only after having finished he will talk to you, two or three sentences.
The reality of the matter is that each year after a strong end of the season Wenger talks about positives and attracting the top top players and I am only basing myself on the years since 2013 and our debt free status!
I mean it is to people who only follow college football after the season ends and believe all the pre-draft crapola where a player rises from out of nowhere to being talked about as a top 10 or top 20 pick.
After the match everyone talked about the first three games [Riggs won the first three games with the loss of only four points] as if they were some kind of turning point.
We may make a Wilson Ramos type signing after everyone else has done the real work, the media will eat it up because they have nothing else to talk about, but it'll only raise our win total from 75 to 76 when all is said and done.