Sentences with phrase «only after the question»

We can talk to modern man about the crisis in which he stands in rebellion against God only after the question of mythology has been solved.

It was only after questioning that the counselor discovered that Charlie's mother and father lived locally and might be of some help.

«Only after these questions are addressed could one move further to explore the costs and feasibility of cirrus cloud thinning.»

Not exact matches

I would offer a rain check in those cases, only after walking them through some questions about what was going on in their lives, trying to understand any current hurdles or pain points that could turn into a need I could help fulfill.

Only after answering this question can leaders truly value relationships in the broader workplace and marketplace and encourage entrepreneurial mindsets in others.

Only after this issue has been fixed along with the question of citizens» rights and the Irish border, will negotiators be able to focus on trade.

Not only did he score just 11 points, including none in the fourth quarter, but things got worse after the game when he had a confrontation with a fan and took a shot at a Cleveland radio host for only asking questions after the Cavs lose.

«I think that the type of budget agreement that was put together by Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles is the type of budget that will be passed by Congress... The only question is, will it be before or after the bond - market crisis.»

During Monday's question period in the House of Commons, Duceppe claimed that after months of negotiations between Ottawa and the Liberal government of Jean Charest in Quebec City, a draft agreement to resolve the dispute awaited only the signature of Finance Minister Jim Flaherty.

After Winfrey's boss questioned why the women needed raises, he told her, «You're only girls.

But the questions about how much of Trevorrow's plot will stay in the movie will only increase after a new revelation from «Saturday Night Live» alum Bobby Moynihan.

Only answer this question after you've done the work of going through the first two.

O'Donnell had fought doggedly for the right to question Redstone — finally getting the green light from the judge, after repeated rejections, only days before trial.

There are only so many people qualified to answer technical questions after all.

After the Facebook data controversy, there was speculation that it would only be a matter of time before Google started being asked the same questions.

The question investors are now asking is if shares hit a bottom and can only rise from its deflated levels after the company...

He made adjustments to the political committee's website only after being questioned by the Herald / Times.

Given that spreading ownership of capital and increasing employees» share in economic rewards has bipartisan appeal, 37 the only valid answer to the question by Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, or other time travelers is that, after four decades of neglecting policies to stimulate broad - based profit sharing and employee share ownership, we have changed course and are now placing them in the policy portfolio, if not at the center of economic policymaking that they occupied from the days of Washington to Lincoln.

By this, I mean we can typically find out the answers to these questions by doing some advance research before engaging (which not only allows us to better spend our time, it also enables us to start conversations at a deeper level) or quickly after initiating a conversation.

The biggest of philosophical and theological questions such as life after death can only be answered with faith or educated speculation.

perhaps the only way to answer either of these questions is if there indeed is an afterlife, which is a large part of the reason i continue to hope for and believe in god and life after death!

His rhetorical question some time back about Mormonism only coming about about in the nineteenth century, some 1,800 years after the Ascension of our Lord is spot on!

Chang Qiang Zhu's behavior began to suffer only after the immigration judge asked him specific questions, such as what form of persecution the Apostle Paul used against Christians and what year Paul converted to Christianity, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled.

On a question about premarital sexual intercourse, I found that I was generally giving higher grades to students who took the position that for Christians sexual intimacy is to be entered upon only after marriage.

«A man, after he has brushed off the dust and chips of his life, will have left only the hard, clean questions: Was it good or was it evil?

well done Jerry God would uphold you, God know how to save and spread the gospel, if not we could have not heard in Africa mostly some part Nigeria, up till today some were still in darkness they have not heard about the gospel but when it is time for judgement, surely they must be judge, This question it is only God that can give the accurate answer to it, for it was written that both young and old would appear in the throne of judgement either you a day child or not, for there is / was no repentance after death, and to die its once, thanks.

It only needed a few hours after Pope Benedict announced his resignation for commentators to raise the customary questions about his legacy: what enduring contribution will he be seen to have made to the Church and the world?

This is an interesting and not unimportant question, but it is after all only concerned with terminology and hence irrelevant in this context.

I have never avoided your questions... anyone who reads back through these threads will see you are the one making the initial personal attacks... I have only called you a liar after you have lied.

Brightman seems to recognize that this is a stretch for him, for when he asks of himself the same question after his correspondence with Hartshorne has ceased, Brightman expresses epistemological diffidence, counterbalanced only by a peculiar attitude of Scriptural faith:

The second question should be asked only after the anger and hurt have been drained off by thorough ventilation.

Then, too, it will presumably be possible to leave it an open question whether the history of human descent as known to us does or does not possess features which only after the Fall of the first man can be thought of to some extent as a predominance of his pre-human past and of his environment, over a sensitivity to the world around him no longer protected by the gift of integrity, and over his lack of adaptation to a particular milieu.

Verse 22 again refers to the resurrection; after this climax there will be no more anxious questions to Jesus, but only faithful prayer to God.

No more than a fortnight after the decision was handed down in Romer v. Evans, the same professor was in print, in the New Republic, not only aware of the connection, but quite emphatic now in his opinion: Romer v. Evans would in fact call into question the authority of a state in refusing to honor gay marriages.

Police have again released a vicar on bail who they were questioning on suspicion of rape after he was re-arrested, only weeks after being released on bail on suspicion of murder.

As I think over my conversation with him today, and after watching only 15 minutes of the movie, I have two questions I want to ask him.

Whether and how far these reflections concerning a positive relation between spirit and matter may be significant when it is a question of asking in philosophical and theological terms whether an ontological connection between man and the animal kingdom asserted by the natural sciences to be a fact, is open to an explanatory interpretation on the basis of the nature of spirit and matter, can only be judged after we have examined some aspects of «becoming» in general.

It is only after the negation of the ecclesiastical and intrapsychic images of Jesus and primitive Christianity that we ourselves are thrown into the open space where genuine questioning, and hence freedom and truth, becomes possible.

Hall addresses with the question How shall we be able to fashion our life as the community of Christ's disciples (after all, our only raison d'être), and how shall we carry on as a missionary faith, in a world that is multicultural and pluralistic?

But this is very different from supposing that we must begin with modern epistemology and only raise questions about the reality of the world after we have explained epistemologically how those questions can be answered.

We were only able to answer a few of your questions in the video, so I've gone back through the comments after yesterday's post to respond to the questions we don't tackle here.

And in terms of se - xual problems, it is easy to understand why Rachel might have questioned whether she was attractive enough for her husband if he was turning elsewhere for his pleasure in light of the fact that they were both taught that the only pleasure they are going to have after marriage is from each other.

He said that after the Buddhist had been in the monastery for about a month, he had only one question.

The Evolution of Adam not only answers just about every question I had after Enns» Biologos lecture, but also includes a lengthy and thoughtful treatment of the apostle Paul's Adam, again seeking to understand Paul's intent within his unique context and culture.

When Cardinal Pell interjected that the problem for Dawkins is that he only accepts sense experience as proof, the presenter let Dawkins off the hook and turned the question on the Cardinal, asking: «Why would God randomly decide to provide proof of his existence to a small group of Jews 2,000 years ago and not subsequently provide any proof after that?»

And my question is, if Jesus is so loving, how can He suggest that His is THE ONLLY WAY???? Cant He even see that there have been others before and after Him in various parts of the World, who have been sane enough to understand that theirs is not the only way!!!

Wow... first, we have a mother that is so clueless that she can not see what she is doing to her child... very selfish... then, somehow, something so dumb only gets worse because a judge who is obviously more cuckoo than the mom decides what name is «not allowed»... guess it's not as bad as the morons who tried to name their kid Hitler, or the other morons who tried for Osama bin Laden... which leads me to the question... do Muslim extremists kill people who name their child Muhammad after the prophet, and then photograph him?

For the present we must leave them unanswered; we can come to grips with these superhistorical questions only after we have dealt with the historical situation, and have learned what this existence «between the times» was actually like in the Palestine of those days.

My only question, after I warm the milk and water and put in the sugar and yeast, do I stir everything together or do i stir up the liquids and sugar then add the yeast on top?

Quick question: I began the process yesterday and the starter was already bubbly and foamy this morning, after only 3 feedings.