Not exact matches
Still, its
truth as a marketing parable really
only resonates
after a bit of experience: The less interest there already is for what you're trying to sell, the more expensive and uncertain your effort will be.
Observing her dual focus, one is reminded of the Buddhist precept about two contradictory
truths, and how it is possible for both to be true
only after you have learned to hold them in your mind.
It was
only AFTER we discovered real
truths about the world around us that the lies and untruths of religious belief revealed themselves.
After all,
truth aims at understanding, which comes about
only when the
truth is freely accepted by the reason.
Yes, the earliest manuscripts we have are
after His resurrection, but there were earlier writings that were not on durable material, and writings that were destroyed by the Romans and Jewish leaders, but the surviving record captures all the necessary
Truths, even though the Gospels cover
only a small fragment of Jesus» activities during His time on earth.
They used to remember thinking but now it's no longer necessary and with the enriched water it is no longer possible
after the cataclysmic campaigns of the last decade when it was decided that facts no longer mattered so therefore
truth no longer existed so therefore thinking was no longer necessary but in fact futile so therefore not
only sterile but dangerous and therefore behavior alone was substantial and adherence to action alone was useful.
Besides, I have serious doubts that
after all these centuries later, with all the scholars, and books and research done on this same topic, that SHE and SHE alone has finally pulled out the
truth and is the
only one willing to say it?
After a while you start to feel sorry for the contestants, recognizing that they have put themselves in a situation in which the so - called
truth can
only expose some of their deepest secrets.
Yes, and
after responding to Cq, would you please explain the difference between pushing one's beliefs on others and «
only sharing the
Truth?»
I would
only be all too happy to provide him detail but
truth is not what he is
after.
That's why Paul lays out the doctrinal
truths in Romans 6:1 - 10 and then it's
only after explaining the doctrinal
truths does he tell us to reckon it so.
After she discovered the
truth during their
only face - to - face encounter (a debacle recounted in A Green Journey) the correspondence entered a new phase.
If his «
truth» was so evident, please explain why
only 30 % of the worlds population believes in him
after 2000 years?
... The Jews (just like the church now) got flippant concerning divorce... I feel Jesus didn't have to mention homosexuality because the Law was clear to any Jew at that time... Paul had to mention it because he was an apostle to the Gentiles who I think were more prone to homosexuality behavior... I'm though not as learned as you... just my thought
after 15 years of thinking about this issue... The church has a sacred duty to all... even gays... we need a unified loving answer to give them... but it must be the
truth... because
only the
truth can set us free...
Dante takes on Thomas» objections by claiming total veracity for his poem as he smilingly capitulates to them: he is,
after all,
only another lying poet, but one who nonetheless claims to tell «the
truth,» and indeed literal
truth.
After drawing out how the encyclical applies this to various social, economic and ecological issues he highlighted, concerning «the problem of technology», that «this is the first time an encyclical deals with the subject in such an organic manner -LSB-...] The exclusively technical mentality [and ideology] in fact, reduces all to pure doing... [True human development] requires a new perspective upon man that
only the God who is
truth and love can provide.»
No intelligent seeker
after truth imagines that he is the
only one on the right track, and the time has gone by when complete ignorance of another man's point of view could be considered a virtue.
After all, the
only way to live out the
truth of the natural law is to know and love the natural law giver.
Futhermore, not everything that is worrying conservative Catholics
after the Council is
only the imagination of old - fashioned people who confuse traditional customs with ever - valid
truths.
Forty days
after he left this world he poured out the Spirit of
Truth, just like the Master
only without the material garment of flesh.
But it breaks down impotently as soon as melancholy comes; and even though one be quite free from melancholy one's self, there is no doubt that healthy - mindedness is inadequate as a philosophical doctrine, because the evil facts which it refuses positively to account for are a genuine portion of reality; and they may
after all be the best key to life's significance, and possibly the
only openers of our eyes to the deepest levels of
truth.
And of a
truth it is not quite so true
after all when people say that «it is a matter of course that a sufferer would be so glad to be helped, if
only somebody would help him» — this is far from being the case, even though the opposite case is not always so desperate as this.
The
only way to find out the
truth in Pascal's view is
after you die.
Every threat that is cast about finding out the
truth after we've died
only makes us that much more solidified that the choices we make are the right ones, life is to be lived in the hear and now, not squandered on the hopes of reward
after death.
Hebrews 10:26 - 27 If we deliberately keep on sinning
after we have received the knowledge of the
truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, 27but
only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God
They will stand
only as equal seekers
after truth, vulnerable and afraid, with ancient triumphalism a pale historic memory.
It is
only after the negation of the ecclesiastical and intrapsychic images of Jesus and primitive Christianity that we ourselves are thrown into the open space where genuine questioning, and hence freedom and
truth, becomes possible.
Yes, isn't it funny how the people who insist that some great
truth will
only be revealed
after we die always seem to be implying that they already know what that
truth is.
The
only real
truth is that no one knows and the evidence point to there being nothing
after we die (since all we see is the body, without any movement or life, slowly decay till it is just base elements such and dirt)!
While Christians rightly believe that all
truth necessary for such a spiritual experience is mediated
only through the revelation in Christ, they must guard against the assumption that
only those who know Christ «
after the flesh», that is, in the actual historical revelation, are capable of such a conversion, A «hidden Christ» operates in history.
What if decisions were made, not based on what other churches or doing, not based on what the church has always done, not based on what the numerous church policies say, but instead
only made
after people had sought the
truth of God through Scripture, the timing of God through prayer, and the leading of God through reliance on the Holy Spirit?
Because the
only way to really heal our pain — particularly our soul pain, I believe — is to do the work at the place of the pain, to chase it all the way down, over and over, week
after week, moment by moment, to keep resetting ourselves to the
truth in hopes that someday the
truth will hold, to believe that all of the healing by degrees that we are doing will someday turn into wholeness.
Finally, the reason why Bob and the other Christians on this board aren't saying as much as you atheists, or saying it as often, is because
after one explains the
truth to an immature child but is responded to with a temper tantrum, there is nothing left to say: there is
only one
truth, but the child is capable of throwing tantrums all day long.
Rabbit accepts such humbling
truths only after venturing into the world of moral and spiritual anarchy, and finding death awaiting him there once more.
The
truth is the modern Bible was put together hundreds of years
after Jesus lived and died by priests who wanted to put in
only those things THEY thought should be read by others according to the culture of the time.
And this reflects a
truth of personal experience: that it's
only after a crisis, with the stars falling from our sky and the ground shaking beneath our feet, that we see clearly — that we remember what is worth caring about and what is not.
«It is not his ministry that is of first importance but the Church's ministry in which he leads, «68 Looking at this statement a generation
after it was uttered one is impressed not
only with its
truth but also with the remarkable extent to which this
truth has been taken seriously by recent Protestantism.
Let's go through some verses, I'd like to start with Hebrews 10:26 - 27, which says: «If we deliberately keep on sinning
after we have received the knowledge of the
truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, but
only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God.»
ok, ok, ok, i get it both sides think they are telling the
truth there are no lyers here on this blogs
only misinform people talking about two separate subjects yet thinking they are talking about the same thing the existence of god... one side believe the other doesn't what's wrong with that... sooner or later they'll changed their minds and one side will believe and the other won't so the arguement will forever be the same about two separate aguement on the same blog... but its definitely entertaining to read the comebacks... keep up the good work you all... its just as fun to read what the believer have to say as to what the nonebeliever have to say...
after all it keeps all getting to know eachother better on what we believe right???
Common sense and an education (neither of which you appear to have) go a long way In this world... no heaven, no planet for you to go to, no hell; nothing within your books can be shown to be true... do you care about the
truth or are you a simple - minded fool merely wasting the
only life you'll ever get for the grand delusion of something
after?
Davis,
After a quick internet search I was able to confirm that «Tom Sellier», «Steve Martin», and «JosephBrown660» are the
only ones that know the
Truth and will be the
only ones going to heaven with the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.
If,
after a searching criticism in this light which screens out anything not pertaining to the «who,» our choice of means is determined by its end, it is in the will of God, and one can say, not
only that it will bring results, but also that these results were prepared in advance, that God assigned its value in advance, that it enters into the meaning of the ultimate
truth of the world, and that it thus shares its efficacy.
Yes, Satan blinds their mind and God hardens hearts, but always in Scripture, this is
ONLY after a person has chosen on their own to willfully ignore and disobey the
truth that is plainly set before their eyes.
Spot on bro... the problem with most of us Arsenal fans is that we've been made to accept average as our
only option
after been promised by Gazidis and other members of the board that we will compete with top European clubs... i feel some players need to be allowed to go in order for better ones who are ambitious and hungry for titles to come in... and someone made mention of Giroud saving Arsenal in a few games like the countless chances he's missed that could have put the club in better positions could be equated right... he should have done that against Watford, west brom and the rest...
truth be told..
the
truth is we didn't play to our potenials we had a bad night monaco didn't play us at our best i certainly believe that we can rescue this tie
after seeing schalke vs real mardid it
only god that save them from not going out and monaco are certainly no mardid and we where guilty of under estaimating monaco last time because of having bayern and barca n previous knckout stages we thought it would be easier which i though as well but the difference is we are hitting form at the right time i think a key in this game will be stopping kondogbia if we can shut him out monaco will struggle to play.
We have
only seen his best in the last few seasons, he was virtually none - existence before then, we look @ Ramsey who was absolutely terrible prio to last season, it took him almost three yrs to make any meaningful impact and yet Wenger stood by him, and he came good, look @ Wilsere, he has never been the same
after beiing out for more than a year, look @ Eduado da silva, I culd go on and on,
truth is, when you are out for that long, it takes time for you to return to you usual level, it doesn't help his cause that he is not even being used by wenger, how is he suppose to get the match sharpness that he needs?
The
truth is that we don't know what happens behind the scenes, we
only get to see ninety minutes each week; but
after near twenty years of incredible service (if you have to brain cells to clang together you would see the incredible success of merely surviving stadium move years), I think we can trust that Wenger is doing everything he can to make us winners.
this man is so self - absorbed... does he really think that we should feel so honored that he chose to stay with little old us... does he not understand that many of us would have literally driven him to the ends of the earth if he promised never to return... has anyone noticed that the
only teams he says are interested in him are some of the biggest clubs in the world whose managers spend freely, follow through on their promises or are terminated, listen to their fan - bases, have a lot of strong personalities within their squads, rarely play their top players out of position, win against their top rivals or suffer the wrath, don't blame the ref
after every loss and embrace their former stars... even if his stories had any
truth to them, he would last but a cup of coffee
What a poor mentality some of us fans have.The system and tactis is not good and unlike many even
after so called impressive wins I still stand to my word because the
truth is
only what can set us free.We want to excel yet the coach will not change this funny system and some of the average players in the team.
this paternal approach has proven a mistake, it does not apply to professional footballers that make more money a week that many do in 1 year... Giroud admitted that bringing Benzema was the right move (
truth to be told he
only admitted it
after it did not happen)....