Sentences with phrase «only argument against it»

your only argument against our physical arguments for Eq.

The only argument against fixing it is that it will not be free.

Their only argument against fasting and promoting their way is that «fasting burns muscle».

Wrestling with Goldilocks The strangeness of quantum reality is far from the only argument against the old model of reality.

That screenshot is the only argument against the mercy rule that you'll ever need.

The only argument against netting extending toward the dugout is that it's the slightest of inconveniences, and you're not used to it.

The only argument against it I've seen seems to be, it's mean, so there's no way God could have done it, because God is «loving,» or something to that effect.

Gim me a break, what is the only arguments against abortion and gay rights?

Not exact matches

The success of businesses like ours is the best and final argument against a «profit - first - and - only» focus.

[109][110][111] Corzine later wrote that only after the proposal was released did he discover «the harsh reality: the public intensely disliked the idea» and that, in retrospect, he «should have pressed harder to identify the most salient arguments against the plan and developed a strategy to get in front of and respond to those challenges.»

This argument could bolster Alphabet's overall case against Uber if the Google parent company can only prove Uber possessed Alphabet's stolen technology but abandoned it.

He serves up a Procrustean history of suicide and the laws against it, but only to suggest the absence of persuasive argument.

What this has shown is a lack of any legal argument against gay marriage or gay behavior... only religious ones.

Out of all the postings on this site today, I found «Derp's «post the most fascinating and informative, as well as deeply revealing.Even after boasting of what seems to be a practically perfect live by any measure, he informs us that he takes pleasure in mocking and ridiculing those of faith who are presumably his opposite; I can only wonder if, given all his supposed accomplishments, he is smart enough to realize how deeply revealing of his true character his remarks are.As a believer, I rarely engage in arguments with my atheist friends, and like to think I wouldn't lower myself to the level of juvenile name - calling and personal attacks against whatever my atheist friends hold dear.Most of the time we simply agree to disagree; when they hold forth with misinformation or ignorance on their assumed «knowledge «of my faith, I try to gently correct them; I certainly don't allow any disagreements we have to devolve into hateful insults and name - calling.

Voucher programs that affect only a fraction of students do leave others behind, but that is not an argument against vouchers; it is an argument in favor of a voucher plan that is comprehensive.

The claim of privileged access is not saved by arguing that each of us intuitively grasps this self without analysis or argument, that each of us singly grasps the essence of experience in this intuition, and that the analysis or argument is required only (1) to call it to the attention of those who have not noticed it, or (2) to defend the claim of such an intuition against those who deny it for no or bad reasons, or (3) to develop its implications and describe its content.

Only by adopting a highly debatable moral argument pitting women's rights against fetal rights could the court give abortion rights constitutional status.

When this is done, no argument is needed against the real presence of a past figure, for a past figure by definition is not the present subjectivity, is not contemporary, and is precisely one no longer subject to being presented through the senses.7 The presence of a past figure can be made intelligible and justified only by a quite different notion of presence specifically appropriate to the relation of the past to the present.

Smith speaks directly to this question in one of my favorite passages of the book, where he speaks strongly against the argument that the only lifeline to Jesus is the Bible:

The real john Again, why is name calling the only argument that they could use against non-believers in the Bible and today?

I personally do nt care what you believe or do nt believe — I only have to answer for myself... The very same pride and arrogance displayed here was also evident at the trial and execution of Jesus... mankind is still the same... quite an argument against the progressivism of man...

IN all the arguments for and against abortion, the ONLY valid statement made is one of CHOICE.

Kraus supports her view by producing an argument against what she apparently takes to be the only alternative position open to Whiteheadians, the «interpretation of God as a personal order of divine occasions» of Charles Hartshorne (p. 163).

They have neither proof of gods or the ability to understand arguments against — they can only be blindly following the jesus myth.

And his argument would count against me only if it were.

Faith isn't half as cartoonish or clearly defined as those who diminish it: If you only base your arguments against faith from academic texts, magazine articles or «arguments» you've had online, well, then who's actually poorly educated on the subject?

If religion can never set secular policy, the religious argument against same sex marriage only affects those that adhere to that particular religion.

But if this argument is sound, surely it is an argument not only against praying, but against doing anything whatever?

During this time period, only a few Quakers made biblical arguments against slavery.

This is not my best nor my only argument for Christianity and against atheism, not even close.

The alleged «silence» about the virgin birth from other New Testament authors can not be used as an argument against it since its factuality would have been revealed by Mary only after the resurrection and it did not constitute the centre of the Easter message; Redford even finds hints thatother New Testament authors framed their affirmations to allow for the virgin birth.

That he chooses to bypass the «guns don't kill people, people kill people» fact only shows that he has no effective argument against it, preferring instead to continue along the path of «don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up».

rather than have a rational argument against the idea I expressed, some people can only correct spelling mistakes — thats because they have no rational argument.

lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have argument against religion from a religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the point, every religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly human nature to be part of the group.

Just as the Anglican Lambeth Conference of 1930 undermined a key part of the conceptual framework that made potentially fruitful heterosexual intercourse the only acceptable kind of sex, so the gradual degradation in the popular understanding of marriage makes it very difficult for many people to conceptualise the Catholic argument against gay marriage.

One of the stupidest arguments against atheism is the one that only believers has a sense of something greater than one's self.

You are only mad because there is no logical argument against equal rights.

George's arguments in principle against coerced religious practice succeed only if he can establish the distinctiveness of religion as an aspect of human fulfillment.

Even the argument over fracking in Ohio's oil shale region plays to Romney, although the Obama administration has made only the subtlest moves against oil shale fracking.

Like Mehta, Lewis objected to God on the basis of the evil he saw in the world, but his conversion mirrored that of Leah's as he realised that his objection only made sense if a moral realm existed: «My argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust.

However, know that sniffing out only the stories of greed and abuse in the church while ignoring all the stories of actual progress for society that it brings pretty much negates all of your arguments to that of an obsessed critic with nothing better to do than make up facts against the church.

«This has nothing to do with religion but with the fact that Romney is only recently pro-life and only recently able to articulate an argument against same - sex marriage,» said Richard Land, the public policy chief at the Southern Baptist Convention, the nation's largest evangelical denomination.

Hence I prefer to restate the main arguments against the static misinterpretation in a concise form only.

Senator Norris here presents his arguments why he was the only senator who voted against our entry into World War I: we have multiplied most of the problems we went into that war to solve.

Now the obvious Bergsonian objection to this whole line of reasoning is that Peirce's arguments are telling only against the claim to have an intuitive knowledge which is at the same time conceptual.

Of the arguments so far examined against capital punishment, only one, the moral claim that killing is wrong, is, in my view, acceptable.

You are quite right in pointing out that I not only make a strong case against gay marriage and against abortion but also carefully delineate the arguments from the other side.

He develops his argument against atypically atheistic Darwinism around the fact of evolutionary convergence: «The central point is that because organisms arrive repeatedly at the same biological solution... this provides not only a degree of predictability, but more intriguingly points to a deeper structure to life...» His viewpoint is quite clear: «Metric - sized animals that are the end - result of many billions of years of prior stellar and biological evolution may be the only way to allow at least one species to begin its encounter with God.

He was raised religious and he became religious once again, with only a brief period in between when he claims that he was an atheist, yet I've never seen any of his arguments against God stemming from this period.

A franchisor must protect against a franchisee's argument that the purchase provision is vague and unenforceable, and a franchisee must protect against building a great business only to be faced with having to «give it away» to the franchisor for less than it's worth.