Sentences with phrase «only as concept»

These few examples give an overview of the richness of this collection of 33 different pieces (the 34th box, by stanley brouwn, exists only as a concept), which nowadays are considered rarities, and occupy a prominent place in international collections, among them the Library and Documentation Center of the Museum Reina Sofía.

Produced only as a concept car, the 2007 Lincoln MKR marked the debut of the Ford EcoBoost V6.

However, to identify reason and nature in this way is to value nature only as concept, that is, as spirit (or mind).

Perhaps it is because the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers wanted to engage God only as a concept, and not as the God - man who lays a claim upon our lives.

Not exact matches

One of the biggest hurdles they face is the regulatory environment in the region, as it's not only about digitizing the real estate sector, but bringing blockchain concepts such as distributed ledgers to the space.

But if they view us as a social - service activity, not only will they be less likely to hire us and take us seriously, they'll be less likely to take the concept seriously, and they'll be less likely to do that kind of hiring themselves.

For his part, Gingrich slammed the concept of «self - deportation» — which Romney advocated during Monday's debate in Tampa — as «fantasy,» only to be criticized by Romney surrogates for having once touted the very same idea himself.

In the past few years, however, the concept has become mainstream, as companies like Starbucks and Timberland seek out socially responsible vendors not only to provide quality goods but also to help create a positive image.

Some of that comes down to building your skills as an interviewer, which can only really happen with a lot of real skills practice (Effectively «probing» a candidate for more information is easy in concept but is far from easy in reality).

The Rinspeed car is only a concept, but it's packed with almost every tech feature imaginable as the auto industry works to makes cars more high - tech and connected than ever before.

Positioning is one of the hardest marketing concepts to not only understand, but to do right, as I detailed in my recently - completed series.

As for whether employees will hate you for a strict policy, consider this advice from George Cloutier, the founder and chief executive of American Management Services and author of Profits Aren't Everything, They're the Only Thing: «The concept that if you love your employees they'll perform is on the edge of insanity,» Cloutier told the New York Times.

Because of the uncertainties in the marketplace — and the very real threats to many companies» survival — many, many leaders see the concept of «culture» and the tasks of defining and managing it as luxuries that only get attention once more concrete and easier - to - measure objectives are handled.

It clashes with emerging structural concepts like open - source or results - only work environments, and with the fact that, as Pink writes, «for a surprisingly large number of people, jobs have become more complex, more interesting, and more self - directed.»

At one point I had a 100 % success rate with my submissions, but have only made 1 submission in the past 12 months as a result of what I know is an overwhelming backlog of poorly written submissions and websites with almost no value in terms of content or concept.

Pure Barre is not only breaking records as the largest barre concept in the world, we are also leading the industry with our strong women entrepreneurs.

Darin Kingston of d.light, whose profitable solar - powered LED lanterns simultaneously address poverty, education, air pollution / toxic fumes / health risks, energy savings, carbon footprint, and more Janine Benyus, biomimicry pioneer who finds models in the natural world for everything from extracting water from fog (as a desert beetle does) to construction materials (spider silk) to designing flood - resistant buildings by studying anthills in India's monsoon climate, and shows what's possible when you invite the planet to join your design thinking team Dean Cycon, whose coffee company has not only exclusively sold organic fairly traded gourmet coffee and cocoa beans since its founding in 1993, but has funded dozens of village - led community development projects in the lands where he sources his beans John Kremer, whose concept of exponential growth through «biological marketing,» just as a single kernel of corn grows into a plant bearing thousands of new kernels, could completely change your business strategy Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute, who built a near - net - zero - energy luxury home back in 1983, and has developed a scientific, economically viable plan to get the entire economy off oil, coal, and nuclear and onto renewables — while keeping and even improving our high standard of living

In these market conditions, we would ideally trade in - line with these moves but ideally enter a trade after a pull back, but if we only applied this concept, we will miss some trades as there won't always be a pull back.

So this concept of having one source of truth shared among different parties is extremely powerful and again has applications not only within financial services but other areas of the economy as well.

HubSpot, for example, might not (depending on our analytics, of course) want to choose «inbound marketing» as a topic for a blog bundle; not only is it far too broad to be helpful, but perhaps leads that download content about inbound marketing as a general concept don't close at a very high rate.

As interesting a concept as NEO is, there's only one certainty in the future of NEO: no one knows exactly where it's goinAs interesting a concept as NEO is, there's only one certainty in the future of NEO: no one knows exactly where it's goinas NEO is, there's only one certainty in the future of NEO: no one knows exactly where it's going.

The concept known as Proof of Work (PoW) serves as a consensus building mechanism to reward legitimate participants and prevent malicious hackers from taking over the network.18 However, most of the calculations involve trying out nonce (random numbers that can only be used once) to satisfy a desired output format.

Maybe if you can start to try to wrap your head around that concept... then you have just started to understand that science will NEVER figure that out and there is no evolutionary process that will ever make us understand... so you are left with only one inference (as you guys like to say)... it is GOD

Ann K: Perhaps I overstated that, but as I'm sure you know, The Catholic Church has always been the most zealous in the concept that only ordained priests can properly understand Scripture.

The Science behind the big bang has some gapping holes yet its put forward all the time to the public as the only other option is..., as well as Macro evolution but well we all know that they say its the only option... Could it be that science doesn't accept a concept of God from the outset so then the big bang and evolution are the only options.

Our celestial universe could very well be part of a ginormous being swimming upon a vast sea upon a grand earth so huge the concept of which is but as a dream to be considered only as truth if one but believes.

But presuming — as I do — the validity of the concept of geologic time, I note that the designation «Anthropocene» unavoidably suggests an exceptional quality to the species homo sapiens, if only in terms of our collective human powers.

If, as Hartshorne does, one uses one's prior understanding of various types of human experience as the source of generalized descriptions which together constitute the final concept of experience, how does one decide whether the generalizations have been radical enough to support application to all — including nonhuman — experiences or were sufficient only to cover human experiences?

To understand why Behe's argument is so uncontested in the realm of fact, and yet why so many scientists find the concept of irreducible complexity not only difficult to accept but even impossible to consider, we should start by summarizing the modern understanding of Darwinism, as set out by Richard Dawkins.

Dante's concept of «monarchy» (synonymous with «empire») as a current possibility, however, exists only as an ideal.

We have here an updated version of Kant's criticism of the Leibnizian monad in the «Amphiboly» in the Critique of Pure Reason: the spatially situated existent is indeed made up of relations rather than being a substance containing its «inhering» attributes internally as predicates which are part of its concept; only the relations are no longer those of the synthetically connected manifold, but the relational connections between the particulars of modern functional or mathematical logic, expanded to include within itself the spatial and temporal relations which Kant could only account for by means of the synthetic a priori.

The human being, has been expropriated of his basic rights: as a «human resource», he / she only has the right to exist as a function of profitability and of what is now known as «employability», a concept which has replaced that of the «right to work».

Furthermore, Whitehead and others have shown that it is precisely love which must be perfect in God — and only love and what is implied by it as perfect — if either love or perfection is to serve as an explanatory concept in cosmology...

In undertaking a non-religious interpretation of Biblical and theological concepts such as he proposes, Bonhoeffer believes the church would only be permitting the Bible to assume its own true character; for the Bible knows nothing of the «religious» in the sense enumerated above.

Sin as a concept is only possible for human beings and pure spirits.

Whitehead's whole metaphysics must be understood not only as a destruction of the previous concept of substance but also as a reconstruction of a more adequate concept of [actual] entity.

In ordinary usage these concepts are remarkably vague, but as applied to the book's proposal they are to be used only by the analysis given here.

Leonard presents personal sanctity as very much within reach — undeniably important for those who feel holiness is a strange and beautiful concept somehow reserved only for the great heroes in faith.

But insofar as in this boundary - concept becoming is thought of as lacking all determination (although in the concrete there exists only a determinate becoming), it is, in its relation to form, just as radically to be thought of as potency, as Aristotelian «primary matter.»

Not only is there not enough time to do this, they would not comprehend most of it, but would instead get overwhelmed and as a result, would not even understand the most basic concepts in math.

It is the distance between the abstract concept and concrete reality, between reason which as such can grasp expressly only what is universal or the universal in the individual, and freedom which concerns and brings about the individual as such.

I sometimes have wondered if the more Deist or Spinoza god concept could be followed to the idea that a creative force jump - started this universe only to move on to a new project, maybe never to return, but I like the notion that such a creative force might still be around but perhaps, building on your notion, re-inventing itself and perhaps expanding the internal complexity of this universe as well as time goes on.

Whitehead's view, in contrast, does justice to the strict demands of the concept of identity: two things are only identical when they are exactly the same.7 A person at two different moments of time is not the identical person; he or she should therefore be understood as composed of many different occasions, and as «one person» only by extrapolation.

Actually I was questioning buckyball's whole bit about the whole concept of hell as being only derived from the Hellenistic concept... DUH...

Actually I was questioning buckyball's whole bit about the whole concept of hell as being only derived from the Hellenistic concept.

The kingdom of God, whether thought of as that which gradually comes on earth through a transformed society or as that which comes only in God's eternal kingdom beyond death and earthly history, is always a social concept.

As a group, Christians and others may come to understandings on love or compassion or certain universal concepts... but even they wouldn't say that the «god» they know is exactly as they describe him... in part because you can't have that kind of universality without also haveing the humility to know you only have partial comprehension in the face of an infinite, and ultimately unknowable, goAs a group, Christians and others may come to understandings on love or compassion or certain universal concepts... but even they wouldn't say that the «god» they know is exactly as they describe him... in part because you can't have that kind of universality without also haveing the humility to know you only have partial comprehension in the face of an infinite, and ultimately unknowable, goas they describe him... in part because you can't have that kind of universality without also haveing the humility to know you only have partial comprehension in the face of an infinite, and ultimately unknowable, god.

Conversely, theology can only be ontology, in the sense that its constitutive concept «God» necessarily requires that the implied distinction / correlation between God and the world be identical with that involved in «reality as such.»

Similarly, Pols» notion of «fields» only exacerbates the problem of unification rather than solving it, as fields are most anomalous concepts, much more puzzling than persons (PS 18: 156 - 57).

[Brightman's] notion of the Given as an intrinsic limitation of God's power, a passive element in his activity, analogous to sensation and emotion in us, can be defined and defended only in the context of an adequate analysis of what is or can be meant by «passivity,» «sensation,» etc.; and the exploration of such concepts taken in their most fundamental or general senses, as they here must be, can only amount to a metaphysical system whose defense is not merely empirical, since the very meaning of «experience,» «facts,» etc., will have to be grounded in this system.54