Sentences with phrase «only as writers»

I personally manage the entire resume and LinkedIn profile writing process for every client so you can benefit from my years of experience, not only as a writer, but as a corporate communications and marketing professional.

Third, as a Certified Master Resume Writer and Certified Professional Resume Writer, I have received recognition in my field not only as a writer but as a speaker and mentor for other writers.

I would like to apply my skills not only as a writer but writing for the correct media, i.e., writing for a paper - based manual is very different from writing the same content for online presentation.

Not exact matches

As the Financial Times (whose writer also testified) reported, a diamond - registration blockchain exec noted that the system was «garbage in, garbage out,» and a researcher designing blockchain - based voting systems said the technology would only be useful for recording final results, rather than validating individual votes.

Translation scholar Peter Newmark explains that the translator has a duty to be faithful to the speaker or writer only in as far as their words do not conflict with material and moral facts as known - and they can express dissent if the text is likely to mislead the receiving audience.

The answer from writers has always been, «The only way to write a book is sit down and type for as long as it takes.»

The writer rightly questions what such a network would cost, but then falls into the trap of suggesting that only companies such as Google would benefit from such connectivity:

As writers, they may only have wanted to report.

Just as a screen writer with a movie, you need to know your plan well, even if your audience sees only a well - crafted summary.

But as Jill Lepore recounts in her new book, The Secret History of Wonder Woman, the Amazonian princess was only as empowered as her (male) writers allowed her to be.

Bergen — now in her seventies — isn't the only founding pillar of the show to return, as creator Diane English will also serve as writer and executive producer.

Rather than assuming that people understand their own interests and act according to them, the writers approach the negotiation process as a phenomenon that's only understood as a set of essentially irrational and emotional responses.

I'm so - so as a writer, and am currently finishing up my second book (just write as a hobby), and in the past made about 30 - 50 dollars an hour as a free lance writer but that was a couple of years back, it was only for about 10 - 20 hours a month, and the gig just dried up.

As the only writer on the management committee, I've been worried I'm going to end up writing all the posts.

Blogs may not be the only means of expression on line, but they are a more viable as a business for writers focused on niches than ever before.

And he's the only author to have won both the ABBY (American Booksellers Book of the Year) Award and the Southern California Book Publicist Award in the same year — honoring him as both an outstanding writer and a consummate book marketer.

The Reverend Al Sharpton is a man who has within his debutaunts many writers and spellers willing to be as written frontmen and only in the limelights of publicity should we as perveyors of watchmen - like folks; ever be mindful of any ill - mannered doings.

To suppose, then, that the actual South known by the novelist and used by him makes him a «Southern writer» only insofar as he uses that knowledge as a matter convenient to his form is to misunderstand the complexity of place to the soul.

This is one of the only books on creativity I've read that speaks directly into some of the things I struggle with as a writer whose work is digested... and criticized... primarily online.

Luke makes less of repentance as the basis or baptism than do the other two synoptic writers; in fact, the word «baptism» occurs only twice in Luke's third chapter, and is not even included in this Sunday's...

The only way that this could happen would be if some infallible power took over these writers, suppressed their humanity, and used them as writing instruments just as you and I would use a pen.

As longtime readers know, Jesse is a our staff writer and a regular on the RELEVANT Podcast, which means this is the only place to stay up to date on his quest.

Other writers — e.g., Virginia Mollenkott and Paul Jewett — admit that various biblical texts do inculcate male domination, but that such «problem texts» (problematic only to feminists, note) should be ignored in favor of the implicit thrust of other, egalitarian texts such as Galatians 3:28.

As a successful professional editor she knew (and only a few professionals do not know) better than to try to change the style of an already good writer into someone else's style, for example, the editor's, or to make it accord with a rule open to occasional reasonable exceptions.

These writers react not only to the political - social breakup of a world, as did the ancient apocalyptists, but also to the intellectual reduction of reality in modern thought.

Both writers justly protest that this simple conflation is not only false but cruel, as well as hazardous to everyone's spiritual and physical health.

These individuals best qualify as Catholic writers, and yet they are currently the least visible in a literary culture where at present only the third group, the dissidents, has any salience.

David Levy (president of the Caucus of Producers, Directors, and Writers) explained that some twenty years ago such sponsors as Kraft, Hallmark, and Texaco normally purchased a whole series of programs on television, but that today sponsors only purchase time — a few minutes of spot advertising on many different programs.

We do find in current discussion various positive statements as to the historical reliability of factual material in the Gospels, not only on the part of writers from whom such might be anticipated, but also from among the Bultmannian group itself.

There is a singularly impressive testimony to this sense of continuity in the eleventh chapter of the Epistle to the Hebrews, where the writer claims not only Moses and the patriarchs, but such splendid savages of a primitive age as Gideon, Samson and Barak, as fellow - members of the «heavenly Jerusalem», (Hebrews xii 22 - 23.)

It is noteworthy that the writer of Ephesians later speaks of the church as the «fullness of him who fills all and all,» suggesting not only that all things have a share in Christ, but also that the community of faith, if not the whole world, contributes something to his fullness.30 In this respect, the last thing to be fully known and understood is Christ, for knowing Christ involves knowing the world.

Luke makes less of repentance as the basis or baptism than do the other two synoptic writers; in fact, the word «baptism» occurs only twice in Luke's third chapter, and is not even included in this Sunday's reading.

Dennis Gabor remarks that his studies of futurist writers show that generally the optimists are those who take man into account only as a producer of goods.

Not only did it change my life as a writer, the community also opened doors to some of my dearest friendships.

One of the epigraphs in Paul Mariani's book is from Flannery O'Connor:»... if the writer believes that our life is and will remain essentially mysterious, if he looks upon us as beings existing in a created order to whose laws we freely respond, then what he sees on the surface will be of interest to him only as he can go through it into an experience of mystery itself.

This third writer who expresses the illimitable as a pervasive and formative presence in the American mind is selected not only for what he wrote but because of when he wrote it.

Reviewing the exegetical search of the early writers involves, then, for those of us who have come into the inheritance of these traditions, the responsibility not only to interact with these inherited traditions, but also to interpret these in the context of the «extratextual hermeneutics that is slowly emerging as a distinctive Asian contribution to theological methodology [which] seeks to transcend the textual, historical, and religious boundaries of Christian tradition and cultivate a deeper contact with the mysterious ways in which people of all religious persuasions have defined and appropriated humanity and divinity.»

and even in Mark and the other Synoptics, as we have already observed, it is only Jesus who uses the title; the Gospel writers themselves never use it, nor does any other person in their narratives.

In analysing such arguments, one must also note that in writers such as Cyprian, the access to the Hebrew scriptures were not only through the canonical text as such, but also, practically, through anthological collections of texts from these writings, which circulated in various forms, being used for diverse purposes in different communities.

And the writer's statement that «Only the blind fail to see the easily availability of guns as a major problem in American society today» is just his personal opinion and not one that I share.

These «Fathers» spoke of the specific activity of God in Jesus Christ as being indeed the fulfillment, completion, and adequate expression, vis - à - vis men, of the Eternal Word of God, but they did not regard salvation as available only through Jesus; even in the Fourth Gospel, it would seem to be the writer's intention to have the Word speak, rather than the historical Jesus in isolation from that Word «who was in the beginning with God», «by whom all things were made», «who was the light of every man», and who in Jesus Christ was decisively «made flesh and dwelt among us».

One has only to read such «anti-metaphysical» writers as the earlier positivists, whether Comteian or in the Vienna Circle with its English disciples known as «logical positivists», to see how true this is.

The whole universe of concrete objects, as we know them, swims, not only for such a transcendentalist writer, but for all of us, in a wider and higher universe of abstract ideas, that lend it its significance.

The only way to comprehend the strange assumptions underlying such language usage is by realizing, as speakers and writers seem to do, that a woman is actually considered the human - not - quite - human (in Dorothy Sayers's words).

You know this writer seems to think he is the only one who realizes that Jesus was fully man as well as God.

Not only was he a sort of writing machine — book after book flowed from his pen, and anyone who leafed through this magazine during his tenure will know that he did not suffer from writer's block — but he was also quick on his feet, amusing, passionate, ferociously articulate, where the ferocity was often as important as the clarity.

As we shall see, this hypothesis of Lohmeyer's not only enables him to write the most penetrating of commentaries on the Gospel of Mark; it also enables us to reconstruct — in further hypothesis of course, since hypothesis is all we can hope to achieve in this area — to reconstruct one or two of the stages through which the gospel tradition passed before it reached Mark, the writer of the earliest account of what Jesus said and did.

The second consideration is that as the individual develops in his life of prayer, he will find that petition for material advantage is less and less a part of his asking, and that more and more he desires only that he may be conformed to God's Will, so that as Christ's Spirit is formed in him he is enabled to live as un autre Christ — that fine phrase which was so often used by French devotional writers in the seventeenth century.

Even non-religious, secular sources such as Roman writers and historians acknowledged that not only did Jesus exist, but that He did do miracles (which they tried to explain away as sorcery).

Only some Jewish parties, such as the apocalyptic writers of Daniel, I Enoch and Jubilees, and the Qumran Sect and the Pharisees, embraced some or all of these Zoroastrian notions before the beginning of the Christian era.