For example, two immigration lawyers where one only does corporate immigration and the other
only asylum cases are not really competing with each other, but will frequently be in a position to refer cases to each other.
Not exact matches
Therefore, he believes that he has a logically impregnable position in affirming that the zero
case of mind would also be the zero
case of reality.26 Hence, either we must talk about matter in terms of the infinitely flexible «psychic variables» of human mental experience, or we can not talk intelligibly about it at all.27 Thus Hartshorne feels justified in the following caustic comment upon Santayana's defense of materialism:» «Matter» is the
asylum of ignorance, pure and simple, whose
only useful function is to postpone for a more convenient occasion the specification of the type of psychic reality required in the given
case.
In this
case, those harmed included survivors of torture who came to the UK seeking
asylum,
only to face re-traumatisation from being locked up in immigration detention centres.
Currently there are
only a limited number of
cases where this would apply in any event, such as those involving the loss of the person's home and
asylum work or where the
case appears to have a significant wider public interest or is of overwhelming importance to the client;
With their oral testimony often offered as the
only evidence to support their claims, and with few
Asylum Officers, only 35 Fraud Detection and National Security officers assigned to asylum offices throughout the country, and a mere 316 Immigration Judges already overwhelmed by a backlog of 542,411 cases, it should be no surprise that the credible fear process is uniquely susceptible to fraud.&
Asylum Officers,
only 35 Fraud Detection and National Security officers assigned to
asylum offices throughout the country, and a mere 316 Immigration Judges already overwhelmed by a backlog of 542,411 cases, it should be no surprise that the credible fear process is uniquely susceptible to fraud.&
asylum offices throughout the country, and a mere 316 Immigration Judges already overwhelmed by a backlog of 542,411
cases, it should be no surprise that the credible fear process is uniquely susceptible to fraud.»
It is
only comparatively rarely, at least in family
cases involving children, that an Art 8 of the Convention appeal against refusal of
asylum and leave to enter should be dismissed on the basis that it would be proportionate and more appropriate for the appellant to apply for leave from abroad.
A refusal by a senior immigration judge to order reconsideration of a
case by a panel of the
Asylum and Immigration Tribunal can therefore
only be reviewed under the statutory review procedure by a High Court judge, whose decision on the review is final, and judicial review of the refusal to order reconsideration is not available.