Not exact matches
And the
atmospheric pressure is
only half a percent of what it is
at sea level, threatening to shrivel cells into freeze - dried corpses.
The atmosphere is very thin, however, and the
atmospheric pressure at the surface of Mars is
only about 0.6 percent of Earth's (101,000 pascals).
The similarity between Venus and Earth whereby they are each
at much the same temperature
at the same
pressure subject
only to an adjustment for distance from the sun despite vast differences in
atmospheric composition is empirical proof.
A shallow sandstone might have 20 - 30 % of pore space, so
at atmospheric pressure that would be 0.25 litres for every litreof rock, assuming gas
only in the porespace.
That means the
pressure inside the flask remains
at atmospheric pressure through out, and
only sealed once no more CO2 is being introduced, so there can be no warming by compression of the gas.
Only volume can determine the true heat a gas can retain
at any particular
atmospheric pressure and temperature, hence why Carbon Dioxide is a COOLING molecule in Earth's atmosphere.
Hockey Schtick January 21, 2014
at 5:32 pm «Not true, planetary surface temperatures on Earth and other planets can be fully explained by the adiabatic lapse rate + solar insolation alone, no IR active gases required,
only equivalent
atmospheric pressure + solar insolation.»
If CO2 (and its «back radiation») had any significant effect, then a person would expect that,
at the same
atmospheric pressure, an almost - all - carbon - dioxide - atmosphere would show a much greater «greenhouse effect», but what the almost - all - carbon - dioxide - atmosphere shows is
ONLY an incremental temperature increase based on closer proximity to the Sun.
In fact it will make practically no difference
at all, since here we are considering
pressure broadening, and the global surface
atmospheric pressure can
only change if the mass of the atmosphere changes.