Sentences with phrase «only base money»

All save a handful of commercial banks today are, in contrast, able to supply deposits only, so that only base money itself can serve as currency, that is, circulating money.

Not exact matches

Not only do you not need a subscription based software, you don't even need to spend money on anti-virus software at all!

CEO of New Age Beverage Corporation based in Denver, CO, Brent Willis not only seeks to bring all - natural and organic healthy beverages to consumers, but he literally puts his money where his mouth is in living out this commitment.

Morales himself, who until 1990 drew only enough money to keep his family clothed and fed, controls expenditures by paying employees a cut of profits on top of a base salary; barters for goods and services; and prepares Tomkats» advertising in - house to qualify for an agency's 15 % discount on media buys.

It is now possible for entrepreneurs with no money but a lot of desire and creativity, to not only create a power base, but to become celebrities.

Not only does the company provide prescription drug plans to businesses nationwide, but it does so on a transparent fee basis — every client knows exactly where his or her money goes.

It may seem that everybody is investing in bitcoin, but there are a few things to consider before you buy: the cryptocurrency is extremely volatile, crypto hedge funds charge serious fees to invest your money, and the value of bitcoin is only based on the assumption that it will continue to grow and become the predominant cryptocurrency.

There's quite a bit of research, based on historical returns, that finds if you retire at age 65, you can withdraw 4 % a year (plus inflation adjustments) from your nest egg with only a small risk of outliving your money.

«Tencent's understanding of how to make money from traffic is far better than Spotify,» said Alex Yao, a Hong Kong - based analyst at JPMorgan Chase & Co. «If you want to make a singer not only sell copies but also have a great way to interact with fans, which company in the world can compete with Tencent?»

Reading more of the ICI findings, it is fairly apparent why the rule seeks to over-regulate annuity advisors who are subject to the rules - based and highly regulated suitability standard while under - regulating fee - only advisors by holding them to a subjective, principles based fiduciary standard: to pander to the employer - sponsored plan providers and keep money from rolling over.

Not only are age - based options professionally assembled using a mix of asset classes, but your money in them is automatically moved from one investment to another to match your needs as your child gets older.

Makin's model is Switzerland (the only major central bank that has tried to implement a money - base rule) in the 1980s, but this hardly seems a supporting example.

[01:30] Introduction [02:30] Tony welcomes Alexandra [03:40] Launching in 2007 — it came from a place of passion [04:25] Establishing clear roles among founders [05:40] Flexing her multilingual skills in business [06:25] Adjusting how you speak to someone based on their objectives [08:10] The secret to Gilt's growth [09:20] Building a business that would thrive during winter [10:20] Finding the capital to purchase inventory [10:40] Moving from venture to private equity funding [11:20] It's all about smart money [11:40] The future of traditional retail [12:20] The subscription model [12:40] Catering to the time - starved customer [12:55] Bringing services into the home [13:10] Leaving Gilt to lead Glamsquad [16:10] Glamsquad started as an app [17:10] Vetting employees [18:10] Building trust with customers [19:00] Taking massive action — now [20:20] Launching the first sale on Gilt — without a return policy [21:30] Fitz [22:00] The average person wears only 20 % of their wardrobe [23:00] Taking the time to understand your customer [23:20] Challenges as a woman in business [24:40] Advice to a female entrepreneur that's just getting started [25:25] The importance of networking [25:50] Knowing the milestones to hit along the way

Make That Money and Budgeting with Your Boo are the only courses that could be used by a non-residents, however, the tax rates used for estimation in Make That Money are Canadian and so as a non-resident, you'd have to estimate your own tax rates based on where you live.

The only base for the expansion of money are the member commercial bank legal reserves.

They are also perfect for someone with less than perfect credit, because the brokerage firm typically is only evaluating the amount of money you can borrow based on the value and mix of your portfolio, although bankruptcies can be a roadblock.

The only reliable effect of asset purchases is to increase the amount of zero - interest base money that somebody in the economy has to hold until it is retired.

Now I am not claiming I have the «Holy - Grail» here to show you how to print money, but I can confidently say I have «Genuine Knowledge and Real World Trading Strategies» to teach my students, which will not only save them many years of «searching» for strategies, but if applied correctly will likely produce high - probability trades on a consistent basis.

Given that the S&P has rallied since early 2009, experienced only a minor correction in 2011, is currently at a cyclic peak, clearly over-bought on a monthly and weekly basis, and has been artificially sustained by central bank easy money, is it likely that the next MAJOR move is up or down?

«We will only process fiat currency - based transactions,» he said, referring to currencies that are issued by governments as legal money, such as the U.S. dollar.

But if money now becomes the only basis for access of any kind — religious, educational, political — to radio and television outlets, within a few years only the largest and wealthiest electronic evangelists (and teachers and politicians) will be able to stay on the air.

Second, you save money by planning meals based on weekly specials and only making one trip.

Only way I can see the Arsenal board paying for Griezmann is if we sold Alexis for a LOT of money otherwise the board will have a hostile fan base and they must know that.

If Mayweather goes the more conventional rout (based on expectations and his history) and wins by decision, it'll call his legacy (perhaps the only thing more important than money to him) into serious question.

it's time for this club to put it's money where it's mouth is... no more half measures, no more settling, no more making money hand - over-fist with little to show for it, no more excuses and no more hiding behind the idea that this is «small» club that can't compete with the «big boys»... the only real difference between them and us is what the manager demands and what the owner is willing to give... we play in the League with the richest tv contract in Europe, we have one of the largest home venues with some of the highest ticket prices on the continent, we have several major corporate sponsors, we have one of the largest fan bases in the World whom purchase a ridiculous amount of merchandise, we rake in coin on tour each and every preseason and we have banked countless millions from qualifying for and participating in various competitions at home and abroad

So to re-cap, if AFC change the board, get new ownership, change the business model, change the manager (or give him an updated training manual), reduce the ticket prices, don't sell any players who want to leave, only buy or sell players sanctioned by the fans, spend # 65 - 85M this window, stop negotiating on transfer fees but just hand over the money then we will win the PL and UCL on a regular basis and this particular supporter will be happy.

UNLESS we're going to go drop a large pile of money on PSU BBall and get a guy who can recruit based on his name only.

Since sportsbooks will only adjust their lines based on public money in games where sharp money isn't involved, I wanted to examine the same contrarian strategies when no Pinnacle steam moves had been triggered on the public side.

I know this transformation of a team can take time but there has been plenty of time for this to happen which again is unacceptable so based on everything that has happened since Kroenke took control there can only be two ways to move forwards, either Kroenke starts to put money into the club — not going to happen, or us fans have to force Kroenke out of the club along with his pet.

He has bluffed his way to getting good and even great players, but can only deliver based on the current money available to him.

Sportsbooks will still adjust the spread based on public money, but only at the most extreme levels.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

It's the fans that keep sacrificing because this team can't get their head out of their own ass... please give me some examples when a top club ever let their best player leave for free at the end of a season... Wenger needs to go to PSG and get some money and talent for Sanchez so that we can end this nonsense once and for all... then he needs to publicly apologize for the way in which they handled the whole situation... if they allow Sanchez to go for free there is no way this club, under the tutelage of Kroenke and Wenger, will ever layout the necessary coin to replace such a talented player, especially considering that Wenger will be a lame - duck manager once again in the final year of his contract and we know how well that went last year... open your eyes people, Wenger has spoken publicly about how he hopes that the next manager can take this club to the next level... WHAT?!?... he then went on to speak about leaving them in the perfect position to be successful, which is one of the reasons why several pundits felt Wenger would leave after last season based on the financials and the fact that so many players had only one year left on their respective contracts... who says this shit??? If you believe you're leaving things in the best possible shape for your potential successor to achieve greatness it raises a couple of serious questions: Why can't you take things to the next level if everything is as great as you say?

Spurs and Liverpool can only really justify major investment in their stadiums if they are in the Champions League on a regular basis so there is too much money at stake to just take the whole situation laying down.

Not only do these links provide us with an opportunity to make money if you decide to purchase the product based on our recommendation, they also save you valuable time because you can find a source to purchase the product.

• Larger than traditional Moses Baskets and includes mattress and stand it offers good value for money (0 - 6 months) • Light weight and easy to move keeping baby close (Only 4 KG) • The wickerless material makes it easy to clean and silent when baby moves • Ventilated base and breathable mesh fabrics for better airflow • Fold away white wooden stand can be used in two positions; fixed or rocking

It would also help if taxpayer funded pensions were put onto the same basis as good private sector pensions, same retirement ages and money purchase schemes only.

Mr. Cuomo, a prodigious fund - raiser who has long preferred collecting fewer big checks to cultivating a small - donor base, raised only 0.2 percent of his money from donors who gave less than $ 200.

There is no basis for allowing them to take money from all taxpayers but then only use it in ways that support Catholic beliefs.

My partner and I have been trying for a baby for over seven years, Finally i am now a mother now Anyone with this problem should please do contact doctor climent Scott now he will help you too I will only advice every other woman TRYING TO GET PREGNANT or have Fallopian tube issues, pcos and other infertility problem too do their research and don't base your option only on anyone's advise, I did and it resulted in waste of money and time.

eHarmony takes your money and feeds you prospects based only on their personality test.

This might be somewhat of an outdated view in today's world but when compared to the past women are in most cases in places where they do not need to assume the mere role of provided for, lifestyle changes in way of life over recent years have allowed women to become really self - reliant, what remains though is a substantial lots of women that are content to be taken care of with regard to the bargain for their companionship, either it is only self - serving or as the beneficiary of earned money for their future loved ones based completely on the individual.

I can only imagine, how much money these FAKE lines bring in from desperate dudes, on a daily basis.

dv i don't understand the need for your post if you think posting this fundude will believe you he won't hes a young guy that doesn't have to pay for a woman he thinks this is like regular dating where its based on phsical attraction but hes wrong were on a sugar dating site money is a factor as well and this changes things in favour to those who have it for sure were searching for the best possible partner for ourselfs but looks are only one part of the puzzle other factors have to be weighed also i don't think this was the purpose of your post what i think your doing showing off to the younger sugar babies showing them a older lady is pulling in more than they can im happy for you that you have a sugar daddy that looks after you very well i would suggest to knock off the showboating its not productive and doesn't promote better arrangements

It's a satisfying, addictive loop that feels rewarding thanks to A) varied layers of progression both based on how much money you earn and how accomplished you are at each job; B) the overabundance of Things to collect and use; C) tons and tons of fetch quests given to you not only by your Life teacher, but by random NPCs (all of whom have their own names and personalities, in true Animal Crossing style).

Tongues wagged in the education world when FairTest, the Cambridge, Mass. - based watchdog of the testing industry, disclosed last month that it had only enough money to operate through 2006.

Some decisions were easy: to provide a program from 7th grade through graduation; to move students through the program on an individual basis; to ask our teachers to be well educated, but to act more as generalists than specialists; to keep teachers» student loads down, and to offer advisories instead of more formal and distant «guidance counseling»; to offer only one foreign language, but to expect all to learn it; to put our money into more adults, some of them young adults, rather than into high rents or new furniture.

Based on this evidence one school decided to re-arrange its» out of school activities so that it only had to heat and light one part of the school buildings rather than the whole site saving a considerable amount of money and carbon.

Andrew Harland, chief executive of the Exams Officers Association, said exam markers were now less likely to annotate papers with comments, which often resulted in a «tremendous waste of money» for schools that request scripts only to find they don't provide information on which to base an appeal or enquiry.

Where Ritz would get the money is unclear, as she argued she can direct per - pupil aid, special education money and federal grants based only on directives in state or federal law.