Sentences with phrase «only basis for a discussion»

An eloquent critique of secular rationality as the only basis for a discussion of a republic's virtues is Kent Greenawalt's Religious Convictions and Political Choice (Oxford University Press, 1987), an appraisal of Bruce Ackerman, John Rawls and other philosophers.

Not exact matches

Is that something that should only be approached on an individual basis, or is there ever a suitable time for more public discussion?

You're anecdotal «I've met these fighters therefore...» has no basis for this discussion because these fighter's characters are not being judged here, (and your one brief experience with them would have little value there either) their specific behavior is being discussed in relation to not only to how other major sporting organizations treat similar behavior, but also with sensitivity to the growing LGBT community, which is also a significant percentage of women's MMA fighters.

Edcamps are a type of teacher - organized unconference that allows educators to get together, often for only a day, to engage in discussion - based professional learning.

Many thanks for the people contributing to SM discussion, some one mentioned that the return of seg fund is only less than 5 % for segreagated funds, let me assure you I have invested 25K in segregated fund and the return of that fund since 1998 is above 13 %, I invested my client's RRSP money in segregated funds most of them have a return of above 1o % and the MER is 2.5 %, when I invest my clients money I made sure that it is my money, if any one is planing SM and if you invest in Seg fund, it is almost 100 % guarentied at the same time based on the past performance, the reurn is above 10 % since 1998, I can not predict the future performance but the past performace is above 10 %, if you are skeptical please email I will send the details `, my email ID is [email protected], this is not a business pitch just an expression and exchange of details based on my experience and research

Join Jaime Wolfe from NBS Animal Rescue as she leads a panel discussion of several Michigan Pet Fund Alliance Certified home - based rescue organizations as they discuss the advantages and challenges of certification including grants for animals pulled from shelters with health or behavior issues or over the age of 7, participation in the Michigan SECC (charitable giving program for state employees), changing operations to focus only on Michigan animals, etc..

Group exhibitions and collaborative projects in recent years are Llocs comuns, Can Felipa Arts Visual, Barcelona, ES (2014); Systems Thinking from the Inside, 21st Century, Chisenhale Gallery, London; Total Vitality (by Julia Tcharfas), Bold Tendencies, London; Recent Work by Artists, Auto Italia, London; A Space Base, for Instance, [space], London (all 2013); The Biopolitical City (by Tim Ivison), Architectural Association, London; Summer School: The Eltham Open curated by Alex Ross, Gerald Moore Gallery, London; (On) Accordance, or-bits.com; ROCRO, MACRO, Rome IT; Echo - System, Helsinki World Design Capital, commissioned by the British Council (all 2012); For Inclusion in the Syllabi, Pigeon Wing, London; Rules of Engagement, Angus - Hughes, London; (Architecture in Words Only), Hilary Crisp, London (all 2011); New Wight Biennial: New Romance, UCLA Department of Art, Los Angeles US; Counter Constructs, Auto - Italia South East, London; No Soul For Sale, Panel discussion with members of The Suburban, Vox Populi, and Auto - Italia South East at Tate Modern, London; Utopia and Nature, Residency ASFA, Crete, Greece (all 201for Instance, [space], London (all 2013); The Biopolitical City (by Tim Ivison), Architectural Association, London; Summer School: The Eltham Open curated by Alex Ross, Gerald Moore Gallery, London; (On) Accordance, or-bits.com; ROCRO, MACRO, Rome IT; Echo - System, Helsinki World Design Capital, commissioned by the British Council (all 2012); For Inclusion in the Syllabi, Pigeon Wing, London; Rules of Engagement, Angus - Hughes, London; (Architecture in Words Only), Hilary Crisp, London (all 2011); New Wight Biennial: New Romance, UCLA Department of Art, Los Angeles US; Counter Constructs, Auto - Italia South East, London; No Soul For Sale, Panel discussion with members of The Suburban, Vox Populi, and Auto - Italia South East at Tate Modern, London; Utopia and Nature, Residency ASFA, Crete, Greece (all 201For Inclusion in the Syllabi, Pigeon Wing, London; Rules of Engagement, Angus - Hughes, London; (Architecture in Words Only), Hilary Crisp, London (all 2011); New Wight Biennial: New Romance, UCLA Department of Art, Los Angeles US; Counter Constructs, Auto - Italia South East, London; No Soul For Sale, Panel discussion with members of The Suburban, Vox Populi, and Auto - Italia South East at Tate Modern, London; Utopia and Nature, Residency ASFA, Crete, Greece (all 201For Sale, Panel discussion with members of The Suburban, Vox Populi, and Auto - Italia South East at Tate Modern, London; Utopia and Nature, Residency ASFA, Crete, Greece (all 2010).

Based on this argument I think that the fraction of additional CO2 that remains in atmosphere for very long time doesn't bring anything worthwhile to the discussion of risks of climate change, it's just another distraction that makes reasoned discussion only more difficult as long as our understanding of climate change and it's consequences is not very much better than it's now.

, so therefore discussions on mitigating or preparing for climate change are not based in science, only politics and the precautionary principle (a political beast).

I've never been one to argue for the inherent superiority of peer - reviewed literature over discussions elsewhere; the only thing that matters in the end is the validity of the arguments made, and truly bad work appears in the literature on a daily basis.

My only purpose in presenting the RSS 1979 - 2007 temperature anomaly series here, and as something of an aside to the discussion, was to give a basis for comparison to what David S was proposing with Rybski's methods for LTP.

To get a gist of the discussion with Tol see e.g. this storify I made based on my twitter exchanges with him (warning: for climate nerds only).

While it is important to acknowledge that the responses reported here give us only a relatively limited window into lawyers» perceptions of dispute resolution processes (and not the clients»), they nonetheless offer a helpful basis for discussions on cost and the suitability of common family law dispute resolution processes — all based on empirical findings.

Really what is clear based on this discussion is that REALTORS are not now or have ever been professionally trained in how to deal with the SPIS and those who first recommended and now hold you accountable for using them in a manner they themselves suggested only further proves the dysfunction of this profession.

AH: Not only do we always bring new ideas to our agents through speakers and roundtable discussions, but we also send out emails on a quarterly basis asking for their feedback.