Sentences with phrase «only believe in something»

Not exact matches

Not only do they make you feel something, they encourage you to believe in something and hold it up as worthy of affinity and even loyalty.

If you believe you're getting one amount and end up with something else, this can throw a real wrench in your retirement planning — but usually only once it's too late.

and the Dr Pepper Snapple Group (DPS) that not only were they giving the Boys and Girls Club a new playground but that the community would build it in only six hours, I knew this was going to be something I would have to see to believe.

While I believe markets are efficient when it comes to stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities and reflect all known information at the time, in the case of bitcoin, and a few other instances like the ONLY stock I've bought in over a year (now up big), when I start to see the mainstream media reporting on something, google search volume through the roof (chart below) and lastly, when your mom asks about it — it may be signaling mainstream acceptance and further expansion of a major bubble.

@ Concert: «I believe like a child that suffering will be healed and made up for, that all the humiliating absurdity of human contradictions will vanish like a pitiful mirage, like the despi.cable fabrication of the impotent and infinitely small Euclidean mind of man, that in the world's finale, at the moment of eternal harmony, something so precious will come to pass that it will suffice for all hearts, for the comforting of all resentments, for the atonement of all the crimes of humanity, for all the blood that they've shed; that it will make it not only possible to forgive but to justify all that has happened.»

All of this is beside the point, however, because the default position in any belief is evidence — meaning, something exists if there is evidence for it, otherwise the default position is to believe only what has been proven to exist.

(I.E., 2 + 2 = 4) Ironically, it is in this arena that you are proclaiming your willingness to set aside all evidence and believe something only because you WANT to believe it.

I guess the only thing you got on me is more people believe in yours than mine, but we both know that even if 99.99 % of people believe something to be true it doesn't make it true (See the earth being flat) so I guess the numbers game doesn't help.

Emerald... in a way though, if you believed something to be true... like really believed... no doubt, for instance, the only way for others to be happy or not suffer eternal damnation (or whatever), wouldn't you feel wrong by not trying to convince others.

They believe they have some magic and their prayer spells are not only magnanimous, but somehow will emotionally disarm their targets and shut down what they perceive as something unworthy in another individual, dishonoring their own spirit and feeding their own Pride.

First I want to say that I'm not saying Atheist is a religion in a bad sence or to try and produce some sort of shame only that it falls under the definition of a religion and wondering how it would change your feelings \ view of Atheism even if everybody considered it a religous view, if it's something you believe to be true (that there is no god) what does it matter if someone labels it as your world view?

My only assertion is that it isn't reasonable to believe in something for which there is no evidence.

I'm wondering if Mr. Lutz believes in doing something else Jesus said to do, to sell * all * of your possessions and follow him, depending only on God for what you need like the lilies of the field or the birds.

in context that GOD created... He can cause it to happen in HIS way... laws of nature did not exist until there was something for it to influence... the writers of the Bible did not believe in flat earth or the sun revolving around the earth... seems to me you cant see figures of speech, but only false stuff... so why don't you tell the weather man at your local TV station to stop saying surinse and sunset eh?

It is only when one loves life and the earth so much that without them everything seems to be over that one may believe in the resurrection and a new world; it is only when one submits to God's law that one may speak of grace; and it is only when God's wrath and vengeance are hanging as grim realities over the heads of one's enemies that something of what it means to love and forgive them can touch our hearts.

Modesty prudence faithfully Believe in peace & never give up, while pursuiting of peace, with courage, decision only for goodness, to help another for another people sakes selflessly with self - controlled, to not make decision to do something bad, with modesty.

Their only sin is not believing in god, I mean how petty for something like an all powerful creature in the universe.

Somehow, and in someway, in all of our lives, someone or something has influenced us to BELIEVE that there are only two sides to the issue of the Origin of our Species or what happens after we die.

«I'm not sure why people need to believe that there has to be someone or something else in control and only that person or thing can truly help them make life's decisions.»

If we're wrong then nothing happens, and the only thing we have done is wasted our time believing in something that isn't true.

I believe that it is these people who still claim to believe in «the classic idea of God», and I'm reasonably sure that it's only because they need to have something to fall back upon.

omegarising wrote: «If we're wrong then nothing happens, and the only thing we have done is wasted our time believing in something that isn't true.

You would need only to have a basic understanding of their way of life, in order to get along, & to show them due respect, or you are still searching for something to believe in.

To Buber the law can not be accepted unless it is believed in, and it can not be believed in as something general or universal but only as an embodiment of a real address by God to particular individuals.

Ministers also and the laity of the Church will know what is expected of those who hold this office For the present it is possible only to feel after and to describe in sketchy outline what this new conception is, a conception that we may believe is at least as much gift of grace as consequence of sin and perhaps more something produced by historic forces under divine government than the creature of human pride and fickleness.

Are you saying that I believe the America is the only country in the world or something?

Not to shabby to believe in something that only requires belief and a book written $ 2000 years ago.

So, is that something that only atheists believe in?

When we freely proclaim the gospel as Jesus offered it to His hearers, the compelling nature of the free gift of God to all who simply and only believe in Jesus for it is recognizable to all as something that no religion on earth has offered, and hence, is no religion at all but is a message that can have its origin only in God.

I do not believe it is merely by chance that all cultures assume the existence of something that might be called the «Memory of Being,» in which everything is constantly recorded, and that they assume the related existence of supra - personal authorities or principles that not only transcend man but to which he constantly relates, and which are the sole, final explanation of a phenomenon as particular as human responsibility.

The only point of remaining Lutheran in an ecumenical age is if one believes that Lutheranism has something of continuing value to offer within the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church.

Faith is something you must have for an instance such as Jesus showing up and dying for sins, because everyone there at the time, is dead, and only words describing what happened are left, words that match hidden prophecy given to those that don't believe the one dying (the Jews don't believe Jesus)... which is self proving in a hidden manner... like finding gold where someone says it will be, near another person that says it's absolutely not there.

For if it be true that the tide of evolutionary totalization sweeping us along requires, for its viability, not only that we must progress towards some form of irreversible unity, but also that this progress must be in the personal sphere, is not this a positive reason for believing that sooner or later something must happen in the world whereby certain basic conditions of the human phenomenon will undergo modification?

And just like you imagine that I believe in God because I get something positive out of it, doesn't mean I only believe in God because I get something positive out of it.

Only something true is worth believing in.

Every since mankind has been as the Apostle described us in his epistle (Again, 2 nd Timothy 3:1 - 5; see also what Jesus said in Mark 7:20 - 23), the only thing that has «advanced «at our hands is our architecture, our technology, and our search for medicinal cures for what ails us.No one is denying that we've done tremendous good with these various advances, but we've also done awful, vicious, horrendous atrocities and brutalities as well.I've heard it quoted that out of all the centuries, millennia that we've considered ourselves «civilized», we've had only a few hundred years where something approximating peace has held sway among us.So again, I'm all world seeking to «make the world a better place», as it were; I just believe that mankind in his present moral, ethical, and spiritual configuration is capable of doing so.We can always enhance out technological prowess, improve our architechural designs, and make our drugs more powerful, but what about our hearts?

You assume that people only believe in God through Faith, or something they read, or something they were told.

You have explained nothing, only shown your believe in something with no rational, scientific plausibility.

lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have argument against religion from a religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the point, every religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly human nature to be part of the group.

Only an idiot would continue to believe something in the face of all evidence to the contrary.

That's why I believe that grace is not only God's unmerited favor displayed in his kindness, but that it also EMPOWERS US TO DEFEAT SIN, something that the law could not do.

@ 12aX7: not only do you believe in something you «can't see or touch,» but also something you can't reason with or prove exists.

Bill Nye believe in EVOLUTION instead of Creationism.To me it's 50/50 how the life began.But the only thing I have against EVOLUTION is how can nothing make something.What intelligence created nothing to create something?

secondly he was not the only one in the church who was a «non believer» many others do not «believe» as well as myself and yet non of us saw a problem with something that was being done out of respect and unison for the majority not for just one person opinion, and last, no one ever said he «had» to pray the only command was to bow your head and stare at the ground counting how many toes you had for all we carried, do what you want if choose not to pray but just bow your head in uniformity not cry about it blow it up and change the way events happen — if you have and complaints or questions please FEEL FREE to contact me [email protected]

We only need to be able to not believe in something, as all others do.

Mankind has always believed in the spiritual world, every fairy tale ever written (or told orally before the written word) only serves to show our deep longing to reconnect with something that has been lost.

The question is whether a generation which has lost its faith in all the gods of the nineteenth century, that is, in «history,» or «progress,» or «enlightenment,» or the «perfectibility of man,» is not expressing its desire to believe in something, to be committed somehow, even though it is not willing to be committed to a God who can be known only through repentance, and whose majesty judges all human pretensions.

Greek tragedy knew the sin of hybris, but only in the light of a personal relation with the gods it believed in — and this is something which should put many pseudo-Christians to shame.

The whole world is profane, though this does not make any difference to the fact that «Terra ubique Domini», which is something which can only be believed in contrary to all appearance.

you don't think there is a certain amount of lunacy to believe in something that can only be proven after you die?