Not exact matches
Even you Fred, must admit that this field is one in which the exercise
of extreme caution is not
only justified but required
by the
preponderance of the
evidence.
Only after this process is complete should the investigation committee turn to an analysis
of whether the charges have been proven
by a
preponderance of the
evidence.
In a civil case, the plaintiff is
only required to prove that you are guilty
by a
preponderance of the
evidence.
In a civil case, the person claiming to be damaged need
only prove their case
by a
preponderance of the
evidence.
An Indiana personal injury or wrongful death claim must
only be proven «
by the
preponderance of the
evidence,» whereas a criminal case needs to be proven «beyond a reasonable doubt.»
I can also argue
by analogy to the
preponderance of evidence floor set not
only in federal law, but also in the law
of the sister jurisdictions
of Maryland and the District
of Columbia (but watch out for hostility
by some judges towards those jurisdictions, to the extent they might view Maryland and D.C. law as too lenient for criminal defendants).
Instead, the plaintiff need
only prove their case
by a
preponderance of the
evidence.
The Supreme Court noted this change in deciding Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa, where it held that «[i] n order to obtain [a mixed motive instruction under Title VII], a plaintiff need
only present sufficient
evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude,
by a
preponderance of the
evidence, that «[protected class] was a motivating factor for any employment practice.
The court can
only grant the minor's petition if the judge determines that,
by clear and convincing
evidence, the minor is sufficiently mature to decide whether to have an abortion, or that,
by a
preponderance of the
evidence, giving parental notice would not be in the minor's best interest.
For example, in California, a court finding
of domestic violence within the past five years also creates a presumption against joint or sole custody
by the perpetrator that can
only be rebutted
by a
preponderance of the
evidence.
(2) In determining visitation arrangements, if the judicial officer finds
by a
preponderance of the
evidence that an intra family offense has occurred, the judicial officer shall
only award visitation if the judicial officer finds that the child and custodial parent can be adequately protected from harm inflicted
by the other party.